microsoft.public.biztalk.general
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
microsoft.public.biztalk.general only
 
Advanced search
July 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
 123456 27
78910111213 28
14151617181920 29
21222324252627 30
28293031    31
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
microsoft ... biztalk.general Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  BizTalk 2004 SP2 Install Issue         


Author: Steve Harclerode
Date: Jul 31, 2008 14:15

Hi,

I'm trying to install BTS 2004 SP2 for a client, and I'm seeing the
following error near the end (I think it's near the end anyway) of the
installation:

---------------------------
Setup.exe
---------------------------
An unexpected internal error has occurred.
---------------------------
OK
---------------------------
Show full article (1.01Kb)
no comments
  CIX_ActiveRefCountLog - Page Level Locking not enabled         


Author: Jerame
Date: Jul 31, 2008 08:55

The CIX_ActiveRefCountLog index on the BizTalkMsgBoxDb isn't enabled. I know
on most Indexes, this is set by default.

Does anyone know if this option should be set to off for this database? I
don't want to enable it if it was designed to be off.

TIA,
Jerame
no comments
  Use EDI parser on its own         


Author: McGeeky
Date: Jul 31, 2008 03:53

Is it possible to use just the EDI disassembling/assembling pipelines
withouth the rest of BizTalk's EDI infrastructure? i.e. parties?

We have an interesting situation where EDI messages are recieved through a
separate VAN, and we need BizTalk to pick up the EDI messages from the
filesystem, parse them in to nice XML documents, then load the data in to a
database.

Thanks!

McGeeky
6 Comments
  Administration Console CLSID_BizTalkPropertyBagFactory error.         


Author: DeathByTickles
Date: Jul 30, 2008 10:03

Hi all.

I have BizTalk 2006 R2 and when I hit the F5 key on the Group Overview in
the Administration Console, I get the following message...

Failed to create a CLSID_BizTalkPropertyBagFactory COM component installed
with a BizTalk server. A dynamic link library (DLL) initialization routine
failed. (WinMgmt)

Anybody seen this before or have any idea how to fix it?

Thanks,

DBT
2 Comments
  Send Port & Send Port Groups         


Author: Manan
Date: Jul 30, 2008 09:06

Hi,

i have couple of questions on Send Port & Send Port Groups it will be
great if some one can answer it,

1. Is there any limitation on number of send ports one send port group
can have?

2. regarding the filters: say i have send port group with 2 ports. My
send port group has filter for particular receive port name and my
send ports have filter for value in one of the promoted field. Well in
this case i'll get the duplicate messages (1 processed by send port
via send port group and other by send port directly). If BTS engine
is going to "OR" the conditions of send port group and send port then
what is the purpose of applying filter on send port group?

Thanks in advance.

Cheers,
Manan.
3 Comments
  Debatching Flat file         


Author: Tapodipta
Date: Jul 30, 2008 08:48

have a requirement here, where i have to debatch a FF file and feed it to
Orchestration Engine for processing.

The FF looks like:

CU20100210221BSINET STREAMING TEST TCS STREAMING TEST FOR COMM
065148145703660 VICTORIA STREET NORTH SHOREVIEW MN551263503Y
OR20100210221790128319230920102121201091000010000210540000030000001050000001400AL000100002105400000000000000000000128
PD20100210221010008016400123091000010124567890
000100003040000724080001230000150000000030000001050000001000

OR20100210221790128319230920102121201091000010000210540000030000001050000001400AL000100002105400000000000000000000128
PD20100210221010008016400123091000010124567890
000100003040000724080001230000150000000030000001050000001000
?

Each Record : CU, OR, PD is of 210 length. But if the optional fields are
not present they would be padded by whitespaces. The FF should be split into
individual XML's with CU-OR-PD records or OR-PD records i.e. CU or OR marks
the beginning of the Order,and PD marks the end of a file. It is worth
mentioning that only PD record is unbounded.

Could someone suggest a way to do this? Is this splitting a FF disassembler
- pipeline thing or Orchestration - xpath thing?
Show full article (1.39Kb)
5 Comments
  Pipeline failure behaviour         


Author: Yair
Date: Jul 30, 2008 02:42

Hello, i have a bit complicated question, but i think its interesting:

I have a pipeline with 2 stages:
1.disassemble -that uses a custom component i wrote, that splits the
original message (in case there is a need).
2.Validate - that also uses a custom component (what it does is irrelevant
for the question)

In case of Exception in the Validate custom component, inside the catch
block of the Execute method, i enrich the message context, for further use (i
have failure routing enabled), and rethtow the exception.

My problem is in a case that the disassember splitted the message, and then
i fail in the validate, the catch block works well (writing stuff to the
context), but when the message leaves the pipeline and routed as 'failed', it
rolls-back, and all the new data in the context is vanished.
In case the disassembler just passes the message without splitting it, this
problem does not happen (once i fail in the validate, i can see the new data
in the context, after it leaves the pipeline).

I tried all kind of things, nothing realy helped.
any ideas?

Yair
no comments
  Message tracking         


Author: pkortlevers
Date: Jul 29, 2008 06:30

Hi,

I'm working on a viewer for tracked messages, and came up against a
few challenges. The proces is fairly straighforward: flat file comes
in, goes through flat file disassembler, resulting xml then goes
through an orchestration where a map is applied, and the resulting XMl
is assembled back into the new flat file format.

1. What would be the easiest way to associate the different message
instances within a single message flow with each other? Ie a single
query to get all message instances within a flow? I tried applying a
"MessageFlowId" (kinda like the inaccessible InterchangeId), but the
main problem is that no fields get stored for the incoming flat file
messages, as field promotion hasn't taken place before pipeline
processing.

2. What would be the best way to ensure only flat file representations
(or only XML representations) of the message are found?
Show full article (1.13Kb)
1 Comment
  A new hostproblems with authentication         


Author: Mike R
Date: Jul 29, 2008 00:31

Trying to access a webservice via wcf_customhttp. I have :

1. Set the webservice website as windows authentication only.

2. Created a new host, host instance with the correct domain credentials

3. Added a new sendhandler for the new hostname

4. on my sendport, Security Mode= TransportCredentialOnly , Windows

However, my webservice is always accessed as reported from?
System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent().Name "NT
AUTHORITY\\NETWORK SERVICE" string

Any thoughts?
no comments
  Reading custom Config information in BTS Orchestration         


Author: Sau
Date: Jul 28, 2008 15:08

Hi
I have some config information like
• Database path
• Schema path (File server path)

We use them in the Expression editor to do some database checks , etc

Currently we have put it in BTSSCVEXE.Config file but it is not a good thing
to do as its not meant for individual application level config

I had built a separate assembly with a method that reads from app.config
file. However it does not read the path when called from BTS expression
editior within the BTS application
When used in an exe, the config path is read.

Can you suggest what is the best way to store such configuration data

thanks
3 Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9