|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: Lukasz ZalewskiLukasz Zalewski
Date: Jun 8, 2010 11:43
On 06/08/2010 08:11 AM, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> until now the policy was that "net group *"/"net user *" commands work
> over s4's "libnet". This doesn't seem to be the case here. Isn't this
> possible to fix - or is the binding missing?
Hi Matthias,
I wasn't aware of that policy ;) From the previous email conversation
with Andrew, regarding moving newuser back to user set of subcommands,
(and reinstating net rpc|ads|ldb hierarchy, to which andrew was
against), i was under the impression that the underlying technology - it
either being ldb or libnet should be hidden from the user and the best
suited one should be chosen depending on the scenario
I'm still not sure what the criteria should be for choosing libnet over
ldb (and vice versa)
|
| Show full article (2.12Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Matthias Dieter WallnöferMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer
Date: Jun 8, 2010 09:11
Hi Lukasz,
until now the policy was that "net group *"/"net user *" commands work
over s4's "libnet". This doesn't seem to be the case here. Isn't this
possible to fix - or is the binding missing?
Matthias
|
| Show full article (0.99Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Volker LendeckeVolker Lendecke
Date: Jun 8, 2010 08:27
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:38:31AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Can you please explain a little more what is wrong with those patches?
To be more specific: This is *EXACTLY* the area that I have
tried to change in the past. Those kind of changes have
caused crashes for me, so this needs very thorough review.
Please revert them now.
Thanks,
Volker
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Volker LendeckeVolker Lendecke
Date: Jun 8, 2010 08:21
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:38:31AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Can you please explain a little more what is wrong with those patches?
>
> You may have missed that I've been working with Simo and Günther on
> improving the source3/ auth subsystem. I'll be doing similar work in
> the source4/ auth subsystem soon, in the hope that we can change to more
> rational structures and share more code. Of those that I've pushed,
> Günther specifically asked me to merge the 'rename and similar'
> patches.
You can not know that Simo when pointing out that I replied
to the wrong patchset told me that he also wants those
three to be reverted.
Volker
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Andrew BartlettAndrew Bartlett
Date: Jun 8, 2010 03:38
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 16:34 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:44:47PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 07:51:01AM -0500, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>> The branch, master has been updated
>>> via 00089fd... s3:auth make sure the primary group sid is usable
>>> via 048575d... s3:auth return the full passwd struct from check_account
>>> via 0a7ff14... s3:passdb Export function to calculate the proper primary group sid
>>> via aaf45cd... s3:auth remove unused structure member
>>> via aa1a3cb... s3:auth create nt token from info3 directly
>>> via e6456df... s3:auth handle unix domain sids in samu
>>> via 61823fb... s3:auth set the resolved user sid in the fake sam account
>>> via ef94217... s3:auth check the user is valid first
>>> via 1bb0afa... s3:auth make sure we set the right username
>>> from aa32725... s4:ldap.py - add some "objectclass" behaviour tests
>>
>> Please revert these changes until they are explicitly
>> acknowledged by a S3 developer.
>
> Gna, replied to the wrong commit message, thanks to Simo for
> pointing that out to me. This applies to ...
|
| Show full article (4.39Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Matthias Dieter WallnöferMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer
Date: Jun 7, 2010 21:09
Jelmer,
I'm performing some tests and then I will push this test commit. Thanks
for pointing this out.
Cheers,
Matthias
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
>
> On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 05:00 -0500, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
>
>> The branch, master has been updated
>> via e206109... s4:ldb python bindings...
|
| Show full article (1.09Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Jelmer VernooijJelmer Vernooij
Date: Jun 1, 2010 12:23
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 11:04 +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 09:03 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:10 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>> Now that we generate and install the manpages in the waf build, it seems
>>> to take a very long time.
>>>
>>> Any idea why it must make outbound HTTP connections?
>> The stylesheets have to be fetched from the web.
>
> We really need a way to build off-line even if the stylesheets aren't
> installed. I guess some sort of --without-manpages option or the like
> would be nice.
Agreed; this isn't any different from what the old buildsystem has been
doing for the last few years though.
Cheers,
Jelmer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
|
| Show full article (1.53Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Kai BlinKai Blin
Date: Jun 1, 2010 11:04
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 09:03 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:10 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>> Now that we generate and install the manpages in the waf build, it seems
>> to take a very long time.
>>
>> Any idea why it must make outbound HTTP connections?
> The stylesheets have to be fetched from the web.
We really need a way to build off-line even if the stylesheets aren't
installed. I guess some sort of --without-manpages option or the like
would be nice.
Cheers,
Kai
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
