MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 30 April, 1999

If You Intend To Reply, Please Read This
Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a page or two will
be deleted without being read.

Somewhere between 0 and 100%%

The last few days there have been no clear recordable instances of
abuse. However, while travelling on the Underground, while walking around
near my home and going to friends homes, I am constantly troubled by
thoughts that those people over there might be about to get at me; that
the couple sitting in the opposite seats laughing are in fact laughing at
me; et cetera, et cetera.

A comment by a scientist to the BSE inquiry sticks in my mind. He
described the possible scale of the epidemic as "between 0%% and 100%%". It
might not be happening, it might not happen at all, to any discernable
degree.... or it might be total. Without clear recording, which seems to
have become impossible the last couple of weeks, there is no way of
knowing whether the harassment really is continuing, whether we have
entered a temporary hiatus, or whether perhaps it has perhaps stopped for
now.

Just if anyone else come along this problem too, the problem is with:
username_format: %%n

I have set it to %%n@%%d and its all working 100%% now. So it should
read:
username_format: %%n@%%d

Best luck you all!

I get this error from time to time as I try to send email to a
*.wilbio.com email address.

The following recipient(s) count not be reached:

'jpedder@wilbio.com' on 11/28/2007 5:02PM
451 4.3.0 wilbio.com>: Temporary lookup failure

I'm not sure what other information might be useful here to help debug
this error.

spam in the group pissed me off. where is moderators or someone who
can clean it up?

Is there a way to configure postfix (or possibly procmail) to bounce
emails from specific emails addresses? I'd like to prevent all email
from specific addresses from reaching any of my mailboxes. I've read
through the postfix documentation, but I don't see anyway of forcing a
bounce, and the references to doing this via procmail state that this
is a bad idea because the mail has already been accepted by the time
it reaches procmail.

hi there,

i installed the postgrey daemon in my debian linux with postfix. i used
some howto/manual to make my configs look similar. so it should be fine.
however, im not sure the thing is working correctly.

as far i understand greylisting, my postfix now should reject
(temporarily) the first connection try of a remote mailserver and do not
accept the first-time-email from that remote host. the next time the
same host connects it should accept the mail. however...my mailserver
does not seem to reject any email like this. it seems it accepts ANY
mail from ANY Host that is adressed to one of my local domains or local
mailboxes.

it rejects mail from remote hosts that is to be relayed. so it should.
but even mail to the local mailbox seems not to be rejected by postgrey
the first time.

does anybody have an idea of what is the problem here ??
you can figure out my mailserver by my email adress. so check out
yourself sending me an email from your host directly.

my main.cf (the most important part i think) looks like this:

test2

test

MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 13 November, 1998

If You Intend To Reply, Please Read This

If you have any questions or observations you would like to share with me,
then you are very welcome to reply to my fax number 0171-681-1190. But
please.... keep your response to one page if you can! I have had several
people faxing my article back to me, including one MP faxing back twenty
pages. I do not know if he had anything intelligent to say in his 20-page
fax because I applied judicious use of the "Delete" key on my
computer. Faxes over a page or two will be deleted without being read.

MI5 Resume Hostilities in Response to these Faxes

When I wrote last weeks "MI5 Persecution Update" I remarked how quiet my
life had become. No longer! MI5 have restarted hostilities with a
vengeance the past week, in response I believe to the faxes I have been
sending to members of the House of Commons.

MI5 Persecution: .net Magazine Applauds my Website

The March 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine reviews the MI5
Persecution website describing it as an "excellent site". The webpages
describe in detail the nature of my persecution since 1990 by what are
believed to be elements of the UK security service.

(snip image)

You are encouraged to read the web pages which include

o a FAQ section outlining the nature of the persecutors, their methods
of harassment through the media, people at work and among the general public
o an evidence section, which carries audio and video clips of media and
workplace harassment, rated according to how directly I think they refer to me
o factual descriptions of the state security agencies involved
o scanned texts of the complaints I have made to media and state security agencies involved
o posts which have been made to netnews over the last three years on this topic

10966