|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Author: Stuart HendersonStuart Henderson
Date: Feb 17, 2008 17:13
> the way we currently poll link status on bge(4) by talking to the
> PHY can interfere with the ASF firmware on some cards, certainly on
> BCM5704C (BCM5721 appears to work ok already).
>
> this causes dropped packets showing as Ierrs in netstat -in,
> causing big problems for OSPF.
>
> this diff changes things so the PHY isn't read by mii_tick() though
> it is still read by ifconfig(8) so you might still see Ierrs e.g.
> if you run ifconfig bge0 in a loop while sending packets.
>
> please test this with any bge(4) and check that link status and
> speed detection still work, and send me reports with dmesg.
>
> mickey ported this diff from http://marc.info/?m=116868446804468
>
> thanks.
updated for newer -current. I have some test reports but more
would be helpful as there are a lot of bge(4) variants.
|
| Show full article (10.10Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Ted UnangstTed Unangst
Date: Feb 16, 2008 19:05
On 2/15/08, Gleydson Soares gmail.com> wrote:> --- util.c 16 Jan 2008 11:39:20 -0000 1.4
> +++ util.c 15 Feb 2008 21:21:11 -0000
> @@ -62,7 +62,8 @@
> *ap = NULL;
> setsid();
> execvp(args[0], args);
> - err(1, args[0]);
> + if (fork() == 0)
> + err(1, args[0]);
> }
just use warn().
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Sergey PrysiazhnyiSergey Prysiazhnyi
Date: Feb 16, 2008 02:38
Hello tech@, Subj. This devices widespread in Ukraine:
http://www.mts.com.ua/eng/Connect_equipment.php
; patch attached. Thanks jsg@ for advice.
--
Sergey Prysiazhnyi
Index: ubsa.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/ubsa.c,v
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -p -r1.31 ubsa.c
--- ubsa.c 11 Oct 2007 18:33:14 -0000 1.31
+++ ubsa.c 16 Feb 2008 09:52:20 -0000
@@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ struct ucom_methods ubsa_methods = {
};
|
| Show full article (2.74Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Gleydson SoaresGleydson Soares
Date: Feb 15, 2008 13:45
- added missed function void exec_wm (char *) to header file calmwm.h
- in exec_wm(), if any problem is found the wm is finished. to fix err()
Index: util.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/xenocara/app/cwm/util.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 util.c
--- util.c 16 Jan 2008 11:39:20 -0000 1.4
+++ util.c 15 Feb 2008 21:21:11 -0000
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@
*ap = NULL;
setsid();
execvp(args[0], args);
- err(1, args[0]);
+ if (fork() == 0)
+ err(1, args[0]);
}
|
| Show full article (1.03Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Alexey VatchenkoAlexey Vatchenko
Date: Feb 15, 2008 03:32
On 2008-02-15, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:>> # echo !ppp -ddial foo > /etc/hostname.tun0 by stu@.
>
> Also it's good to use `-unit0' for tun0... to make sure your hostname.tun0 file
> really corresponds to tun0 device.
> For example,
> echo !ppp -ddial foo -unit0 > /etc/hostname.tun0
> echo !ppp -ddial foo -unit1 > /etc/hostname.tun1
>
i mean: echo !ppp -ddial -unitX foo > /etc/hostname.tunX
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Alexey VatchenkoAlexey Vatchenko
Date: Feb 14, 2008 23:28
> # echo !ppp -ddial foo > /etc/hostname.tun0 by stu@.
Also it's good to use `-unit0' for tun0... to make sure your hostname.tun0 file
really corresponds to tun0 device.
For example,
echo !ppp -ddial foo -unit0 > /etc/hostname.tun0
echo !ppp -ddial foo -unit1 > /etc/hostname.tun1
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Ivan SoloninIvan Solonin
Date: Feb 14, 2008 18:26
Sergey Prysiazhnyi atmnis.com> wrote:
> Hello guys, Subj, I was surprised when didn't found ppp at /etc/rc.
> It is really so comfortably to start ppp for calling UMTS, EV-DO
devices
> before pf.
>
> Especially in tun (4) cases.
>
> ; patch attached.
|
| Show full article (1.05Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Sergey PrysiazhnyiSergey Prysiazhnyi
Date: Feb 14, 2008 15:51
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:39:59PM -0800, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Sergey Prysiazhnyi atmnis.com> wrote:>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:23:42PM -0800, Chris Kuethe wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Sergey Prysiazhnyi atmnis.com> wrote:>>>> Hello guys, Subj, I was surprised when didn't found ppp at /etc/rc.
>>>> It is really so comfortably to start ppp for calling UMTS, EV-DO devices
>>>> before pf.
>>>>
>>>> Especially in tun (4) cases.
>>>
>>> This is a bad idea. But thanks for at least sending a patch.
>>>
>>> The whole point of starting pf before the network is to prevent
>>> packets from sneaking in. There are some nice things about pf (like
>>> the "egress" interface group) that will let you write a generic
>>> ruleset that loads before PPP interfaces go active.
>>
>> Ok, thanks you chris.kuethe@ & stu@.
>
> I think I owe you a bit of an apology... I misread and thought you ...
|
| Show full article (1.29Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
