Author: Gabor KovesdanGabor Kovesdan
Date: Aug 18, 2008 11:59
> No offense and no explicit objection from me here. I am just nervous
> about handling this sort of information which can be used in our
> document more than once.
>
Yes, I agree, that would be nice to have, especially because that
detailed contributors list as a single DocBook document looked well.
> Gabor Kovesdan kovesdan.org> wrote
> in <48A8001E.1000104@kovesdan.org>:
>>> separately, so I think it would be complicated to implement. I think
>> there are other overlapping parts, like &os; and the current release
>> entities. Maybe it would make sense to separate them to a common part
>> somehow and use it for the web and the doc?
>
> Yes, I think we should go for that direction somehow. And in a long
> term, maybe we should merge www and doc into a single repository
> (like www/en -> doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs or so) because of making
> reuse of information easier. Currently www build heavily depends on
> doc tree (www only build can be done but the result is not complete),
> so I think the merged repository with an option for htdocs-only build ...
| 
