> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Pav Lucistnik freebsd.org> wrote:

>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:45:18 +0000 (UTC), Florent Thoumie wrote
>>

>>> flz 2008-03-31 12:45:18 UTC
>>>
>>> FreeBSD src repository
>>>
>>> Modified files:
>>> usr.sbin/pkg_install Makefile
>>> Removed files:
>>> usr.sbin/pkg_install/sign Makefile README check.c common.c
>>> extern.h gzip.c gzip.h main.c pgp.h
>>> pgp_check.c pgp_sign.c pkg_sign.1
>>> sha1.c sign.c stand.c stand.h x509.c
>>> Log:
>>> Retire pkg_sign. It was used to embed signatures in gzip'ed packages.
>>> It's not relevant since we've changed to bzip2 compression.

>>
>> Yay! ...

>
> On Mar 31, 2008, at 2:56 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>

>> This is the age old "these fortune cookies may be offensive to some
>> people" bikeshed. Do we really want to go there again?
>>
>> If removing the ones deleted by Ganbold is considered such a big loss to
>> the consumers of the fortune cookies, then sure, we'll have to backout
>> the removal. I'd prefer if we didn't, but oh well :/

>
>
> from fortune(6):
>
> "I think the world would be a more peaceful place if people
> could just keep their fingers out of the fortune files.
>
> -- Jordan K. Hubbard"
>
> :-) ...

> I assume these will be removed in the near future?
>
> # ZFS sources
> ^src/compat/opensolaris
> ^src/contrib/opensolaris
> ^src/sys/compat/opensolaris
> ^src/sys/contrib/opensolaris

> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 04:58:11PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:

>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 09:47:11PM +0000, John Birrell wrote:

>>> jb 2008-03-28 21:47:11 UTC
>>>
>>> FreeBSD src repository
>>>
>>> Modified files:
>>> . exclude
>>> Log:
>>> Add the new CDDL paths which contain external src without FreeBSD IDs.

>>
>> Why are these being excluded? The repo-copy put them in place, and after
>> that they should have $FreeBSD$ ID's as you've told me they are modified
>> from the vendor sources.

>
> The repo copy needed a forced commit without other changes. cvs wouldn't
> let me do that without the entry in the exclude file.

> "David O'Brien" FreeBSD.org> writes:

>> This is what should be committed?

>
> No. My code was intended to replace Martin's, not to be merged with it
> into some kind of Frankenstein's monster.

> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, David Xu wrote:
>

>> davidxu 2008-03-31 02:55:50 UTC
>>
>> FreeBSD src repository
>>
>> Modified files:
>> lib/libthr/thread thr_cond.c thr_private.h thr_rwlock.c
>> Log:
>> Rewrite rwlock to user atomic operations to change rwlock state, this
>> eliminates internal mutex lock contention when most rwlock operations
>> are read.
>>
>> Orignal patch provided by: jeff

>
> Thanks David!
>
> Do you still plan to do kernel side support so we can totally eliminate
> the pthread mutex and condvars from rwlock? I have evidence that this ...