mailing.database.pgsql-docs
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
mailing.database.pgsql-docs only
 
Advanced search
January 2007
motuwethfrsasuw
1234567 1
891011121314 2
15161718192021 3
22232425262728 4
293031     5
2007
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2007 2006    
total
mailing.database.pgsql-docs Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Re: [DOCS] v8.2 US documentation         


Author: Bruce Momjian
Date: Jan 10, 2007 15:59

Lou O'Quin wrote:
> is missing the Index. the A4 version has an index, but the US version
> (as of 1/10 1:00 PM MST) does not.

I can confirm this report. To fix it, you need to run 'gmake html'
twice, then the target PDF you want. This will all work automatically
in 8.3. Also, I assume it should be run against 8.2.1, not 8.2.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
no comments
  [DOCS] v8.2 pdf (US) missing index as of time of this post         


Author: Lou O'Quin
Date: Jan 10, 2007 13:12

PostgreSQL 8.2 U.S. documention (PDF) is missing the index contents.
(The index title is present, though.) The A4 version has the index
contents.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org
no comments
  [DOCS] v8.2 US documentation         


Author: Lou O'Quin
Date: Jan 10, 2007 13:00

is missing the Index. the A4 version has an index, but the US version
(as of 1/10 1:00 PM MST) does not.

Lou O'Quin

Sr. Systems Analyst
Talley Defense Systems
Mesa, AZ
480.898.2385

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
no comments
  [DOCS] problems in vacuumdb.1         


Author: esr
Date: Jan 7, 2007 20:33

This is automatically generated email about problems in a man page for which
you appear to be responsible. If you are not the right person or list, tell
me and I will attempt to correct my database.

See http://catb.org/~esr/doclifter/problems.html for details on how and
why these patches were generated. Feel free to email me with any questions.
Note: These patches do not change the mod date of any manual page. You
may wish to do that by hand.

Problems with vacuumdb.1:

1. Broken command synopsis syntax. This may mean you're using a
construction in the command synopsis other than the standard
[ ] | { }, or it may mean you have running text in the command synopsis
section (the latter is not technically an error, but it's impossible
to translate into DocBook markup).
Show full article (1.64Kb)
no comments
  Re: [DOCS] DateStyle config variable         


Author: Tom Lane
Date: Dec 23, 2006 08:07

Guillaume Lelarge lelarge.info> writes:
>> I wondered if there was a reason for the mixed case capitalization of
>> the DateStyle setting ? all other settings are in lowercase. Even
>> DateStyle is in lowercase in the postgresql.conf file.

DateStyle and TimeZone have both historically been spelled like that,
and are delivered to client code in that form (not only in SHOW but
in the lower-level ParameterStatus message). I think the odds of
breaking client-side code are very high if we change it.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
no comments
  Re: [DOCS] DateStyle config variable         


Author: Guillaume Lelarge
Date: Dec 23, 2006 01:42

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060605000703000102020004
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Guillaume Lelarge a
no comments
  Re: [DOCS] Switching to XML         


Author: Guillaume Lelarge
Date: Dec 22, 2006 09:10

Alvaro Herrera a ecrit le 22/12/2006 17:54:
> Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>
>> The last PDF available on the website has some bad issues. Just take a
>> look at table 8-13 (page 805), table 8-18 (page 113). One more time, I
>> don't say you can't fix this in SGML (and I think we already talk of
>> this some time ago). But *I* won't do it. And I think some people are
>> willing to work on this but they also want to have XML documentation.
>
> I checked the PDF available on
> http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/pdf/8.2/postgresql-8.2-A4.pdf
> and it does have the issues Guillaume mentions: table 8-13 (on page 105)
> is certainly mangled (columns too wide), and table 8-18 is mangled too
> (a row's content is too wide for the columns, so the text on one column
> overlaps the text on the...
Show full article (1.39Kb)
no comments
  Re: [DOCS] Switching to XML         


Author: Alvaro Herrera
Date: Dec 22, 2006 08:56

Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> The last PDF available on the website has some bad issues. Just take a
> look at table 8-13 (page 805), table 8-18 (page 113). One more time, I
> don't say you can't fix this in SGML (and I think we already talk of
> this some time ago). But *I* won't do it. And I think some people are
> willing to work on this but they also want to have XML documentation.

I checked the PDF available on
http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/pdf/8.2/postgresql-8.2-A4.pdf
and it does have the issues Guillaume mentions: table 8-13 (on page 105)
is certainly mangled (columns too wide), and table 8-18 is mangled too
(a row's content is too wide for the columns, so the text on one column
overlaps the text on the next). This problem can also be seen on other
tables, for example 9-5 and 9-6.

I printed one page and it looks just as silly, so it's not just a
display problem.

Also, the US version is lacking the index -- I suppose it was built
without the complete index.sgml file.
Show full article (1.32Kb)
no comments
  Re: [DOCS] Switching to XML         


Author: Tom Lane
Date: Dec 22, 2006 07:19

David Blewett dawninglight.net> writes:
> There's been a question posted to that bug. Would you mind replying
> to it? You don't have to create an account there. I can post your reply.

I haven't gotten any reply from my posting to the upstream mailing list
at sourceforge :-( so it's hard to tell if anything will happen there.
I don't really approve of fixing this on a distro-by-distro basis, but
maybe we have no other choice.

Anyway, what I said to them was

------- Forwarded Message

Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 23:35:54 -0500
From: Tom Lane
To: openjade-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Performance problems with NodeListObj lists

It's been folklore for some time at the PostgreSQL project
(www.postgresql.org) that running our documentation through jade to
produce TeX output requires about three days on current hardware :-(
Today I got motivated to look into why, and what I find is a pretty
localized problem, as illustrated by this oprofile trace:
Show full article (4.44Kb)
no comments
  Re: [DOCS] Switching to XML         


Author: David Blewett
Date: Dec 22, 2006 02:40

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

David Blewett wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> However, I have no idea what it'll take to get this patch propagated
>> into the copies people actually use, so your fix sounds good for the
>> short term.
>
>> regards, tom lane
>
>
> I submitted the patch to gentoo's bugzilla:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158605
>
> David Blewett
>

Hi Tom:

There's been a question posted to that bug. Would you mind replying
to it? You don't have to create an account there. I can post your reply.
Show full article (1.59Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9