linux.kernel
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
linux.kernel only
 
Advanced search
December 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
1234567 49
891011121314 50
15161718192021 51
22232425262728 52
293031     1
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
linux.kernel Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Re: [PATCH] Compress kernel modules on installation         


Author: Roland
Date: Dec 26, 2008 15:50

>>>> what about some "make modules_install_compressed" instead ?
>>>>
>>>> as i have run out of diskspace quite often when installing test
>>>> kernels, i
>>>> think we really need a feature like this.
>>>>
>>>> i`d also favour the makefile approach.
>>>> why another kconfig option?
>>>>
>>>> jan`s patch looks clean and simple, but i think it`s a little bit
>>>> intrusive...
>>>
>>> Why so? module-ini
>>
>> with "intrusive" i meant, that all modules are now compressed by default
>> and there is no switch to build them uncompressed.
>> so you change a long established default which may not be welcomed by
>> everyone and give no option for conservative people.
>>
> How many people use the option to install an uncompressed kernel? ...
Show full article (1.43Kb)
no comments
  Boot hang after io scheduler registration         


Author: Kai Ruhnau
Date: Dec 26, 2008 15:50

Hi,

I have a somewhat weird hang problem when booting all recent kernel
versions including 2.6.28: When I boot my system and let grub start the
kernel after a 5 second timeout, the system will hang after registering
the io schedulers (see below). However, when I choose the default grub
entry manually by pressing ENTER in the menu, the kernel does not hang
and continues the normal booting process.

Below, you can find the place of the hang and an excerpt of the messages
that follow on a normal boot as well as some system information.

Thanks for your time on this problem.

Best regards
Kai

# dmesg
...
[ 0.309379] io scheduler noop registered
[ 0.309473] io scheduler anticipatory registered
[ 0.309569] io scheduler deadline registered
[ 0.309679] io scheduler cfq registered (default)

Hang happens here.
Show full article (3.81Kb)
no comments
  Re: SD/MMC cards: how crappy they are?         


Author: Pavel Machek
Date: Dec 26, 2008 14:40

Hi!
> If this is your random eject out from your HP laptop problem, note
> that random ejects while the card is writing can cause corruption of
> the flash translation layer (FTL), which for some really crappy cards,
> can permanently damage them; hopefully most of those are gone from the
> market, but I wouldn't be positive about that. The better ones will
> have some kind of journalling scheme for their FTL...
>
> Fsck does have a force rewrite option, although it's not the default.
> You have to answer "n" to ignore error, and then yes to "force
> rewrite". I should perhaps change that; my worry at the time was a
> transient read error tricking e2fsck into blowing away the contents of
> what was actually a good sector. Of course, that will only help
Show full article (3.13Kb)
no comments
  qdisc requeue stats         


Author: Don Ash
Date: Dec 26, 2008 14:20

Hi,

Is there a way to see q->qstats.requeues statistics
(dev_requeue_skb()) ? I tried tc tool but it does not
show it...

Don.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
1 Comment
  ebt_ulog out of memory.         


Author: Michael Buesch
Date: Dec 26, 2008 14:00

I get the following error message at bootup.
[ 1.839948] ebt_ulog: out of memory trying to call netlink_kernel_create

The system certainly is not out of memory, because it works fine, otherwise.

The kernel is a 2.6.28-rc9 on an x86_64 architecture.

--
Greetings, Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
no comments
  RFC: detection of silent corruption via ATA long sector reads         


Author: Greg Freemyer
Date: Dec 26, 2008 13:50

All,

On the mdraid list, there was a recent thread about using raid
functionality to detect / repair silent corruption.

The issues brought up were that a lot of silent data corruption occurs
when cables, controllers, power supplies, ram, cache, etc. goes bad.

It made me think about another option for detecting silent corruption
I have not seen discussed, but maybe I missed it.

Aiui, the ATA spec allows for the reading of a long sector as well as
the normal 512 byte sector. When you get a long sector you also get
the CRC (or whatever checksum data there is on the disk that allows
the drive itself to detect media errors).

I don't have any idea how easy or hard it would be to do, but I would
like to see the entire block subsystem enhanced to optionally allow
long sector reads to be used in a "paranoid" fashion.

Effectively it would be:

1) Read long sector from drive: verify CRC in kernel. This tests
most everything on the i/o path.
Show full article (1.80Kb)
1 Comment
  Re: SD/MMC cards: how crappy they are?         


Author: Pavel Machek
Date: Dec 26, 2008 13:50

> Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>>
>>> I have seen flash cards die permanently from having a partition table it
>>> didn't like written to it. Yes, the microcontroller on the flash card
>>> tried to interpret the partition table, assumed to be MS-DOS style, and
>>> would crash.
>>
>> Aha... that explains why I killed few flashcards by tar xzvf /dev/sdX files
>> ... hopefully thats fixed in the better/bigger cards now.
>>
>
> Also had a batch of cards which would silently "correct" the partition
> table for you to align the partitions to its flash erase blocks.
Show full article (1.04Kb)
1 Comment
  ext3 defaults to errors=continue, why?         


Author: Pavel Machek
Date: Dec 26, 2008 13:40

Hi!

in-tree documentation says that default for ext3 is errors=remount-ro,
and that's sensible, but I see errors=continue on my disks, due to
superblock settings. (Maybe documentation should mention that?)

I don't know where errors=continue came from (and I think its
dangerous); mkfs does not seem to have such option, nor can I see
anything in /etc/mke2fs.conf...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
no comments
  Machen Sie Ihr Geld winterfest         


Author: Weihnachtsmann
Date: Dec 26, 2008 12:40

Feiern Sie ein Winterfest und machen Sie Ihr Geld winterfest - meine Freundin zeigt Ihnen, wie:

http://www.Geld-Winterfest.com/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
no comments
  Re: [PATCH] Compress kernel modules on installation         


Author: Roland
Date: Dec 26, 2008 12:30

what about some "make modules_install_compressed" instead ?

as i have run out of diskspace quite often when installing test kernels, i
think we really need a feature like this.

i`d also favour the makefile approach.
why another kconfig option?

jan`s patch looks clean and simple, but i think it`s a little bit
intrusive...

regards
roland

ps:
i`d use gzip without "-9" as this gives very little space savings. it mostly
burns cpu and slows things down too much.
( see
http://www.linuxjournal.com/files/linuxjournal.com/linuxjournal/articles/080/8051/8051f1... )

On Friday 2008-12-26 20:48, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This patch allows kernel modules to be compressed when 'make
>>>> modules_install' is run after being copied to
>>>> the /lib/module/...
Show full article (2.73Kb)
8 Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9