Re: Re: Mentions of non-free (Re: FSF not considering Debian as Free)
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
linux.debian.project only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Re: Mentions of non-free (Re: FSF not considering Debian as Free)         

Group: linux.debian.project · Group Profile
Author: Filipus Klutiero
Date: Sep 17, 2008 12:10

>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>>>
>>>> Translated to the current way things are done, this means that
>>> according > to Richard, the Debian website or Debian refer to the
>>> existence of the > non-free component in a way that suggests getting
>>> non-free software from > there.
>>>>
>>>> I'm very curious what part of the website or Debian would be doing
>>> this > for years, but I guess someone could ask Richard.
>>>
>>> non-free is mentioned on packages.debian.org
>>>
>> Does the mentions suggest getting software from there?
>
> There are download links, aren't they? Don't they suggest getting the
> software from there?
>
I guess. But the links are not there for years.
>>> non-free is mentioned in release documentation
>>>
>> Does the mentions suggest getting software from there?
>
> Don't the release documentatino contain notices on how to tweak apt or
> the installer to install non-free software?
>
I don't know. I see that it talks about contrib. That's probably a bug.
>>> non-free is mentioned during the installer for users to add (I think)
>>>
>> It's not mentioned normally at least. Is it mentioned in expert installs?
>
> The installer provides a menu option to import non-free firmware from
> arbitrary media (good work btw.!).
>
Right, though lenny desn't exist since years.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!