|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Jonas MeurerJonas Meurer Date: Sep 10, 2008 09:40
Hello,
I discovered that pkg-grub-devel@ lists.alioth.debian.org rejects any
mails from non-subscribers even though the address is listed as
maintainers contact address for grub packages in Debian. This topic has
already been discussed in the past, and to my knowledge it has been
agreed that the described situation is not an option.
I discussed the issue with Robert Millan and others in #debian-devel on
IRC. Unfortunately Robert seems rather ignorant about this issue.
As I think that the current situation is not acceptable, I suggest that
alioth admins overwrite the current posting policy for pkg-grub-devel.
What do others think?
greetings,
jonas
|
| |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Luk ClaesLuk Claes Date: Sep 10, 2008 10:10
Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I discovered that pkg-grub-devel@ lists.alioth.debian.org rejects any
> mails from non-subscribers even though the address is listed as
> maintainers contact address for grub packages in Debian. This topic has
> already been discussed in the past, and to my knowledge it has been
> agreed that the described situation is not an option.
Right.
> I discussed the issue with Robert Millan and others in #debian-devel on
> IRC. Unfortunately Robert seems rather ignorant about this issue.
>
> As I think that the current situation is not acceptable, I suggest that
> alioth admins overwrite the current posting policy for pkg-grub-devel.
Wrong, alioth admins should make sure the default is sane, but they
shouldn't overwrite current policies unless requested/acked by the
listmaster or project admin IMHO.
|
| Show full article (1.43Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Felix ZielckeFelix Zielcke Date: Sep 10, 2008 10:50
Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2008, 17:38 +0200 schrieb Jonas Meurer:
> I discovered that pkg-grub-devel@ lists.alioth.debian.org rejects any
> mails from non-subscribers even though the address is listed as
> maintainers contact address for grub packages in Debian. This topic has
> already been discussed in the past, and to my knowledge it has been
> agreed that the described situation is not an option.
>
> I discussed the issue with Robert Millan and others in #debian-devel on
> IRC. Unfortunately Robert seems rather ignorant about this issue.
>
> As I think that the current situation is not acceptable, I suggest that
> alioth admins overwrite the current posting policy for pkg-grub-devel.
>
> What do others think?
Well I already told to you on the list and even didn't know yet that
Robert discussed this now on #debian-devel with you and others.
(I'm just in #grub)
|
| Show full article (1.63Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Jonas SmedegaardJonas Smedegaard Date: Sep 10, 2008 11:00
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:38:51PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
Rejects or holds back?
>This topic has already been discussed in the past, and to my knowledge
>it has been agreed that the described situation is not an option.
References, please?
Kind regards,
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
|
| Show full article (0.95Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Stephen GranStephen Gran Date: Sep 10, 2008 11:30
This one time, at band camp, Luk Claes said:
> Jonas Meurer wrote:
>> As I think that the current situation is not acceptable, I suggest that
>> alioth admins overwrite the current posting policy for pkg-grub-devel.
>
> Wrong, alioth admins should make sure the default is sane, but they
> shouldn't overwrite current policies unless requested/acked by the
> listmaster or project admin IMHO.
|
| Show full article (1.30Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Julien CristauJulien Cristau Date: Sep 10, 2008 17:50
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 19:34:20 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:38:51PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>
> Rejects or holds back?
>
Rejects. Holding back for moderation would be just fine, as long as
someone processes the moderation queue in reasonable time, IMO.
Restricting to subscribers is just nonsense.
Cheers,
Julien
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|