dopewars do we need such a game in debian distribution?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
linux.debian.project only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

linux.debian.project Profile…
 Up
dopewars do we need such a game in debian distribution?         


Author: Christof Adams
Date: Feb 27, 2008 06:20

Hallo Francois,

I am a long time user of debian. In the updating process i found the
programm "dopewars" you maintain. As a user i much apreciate the work of
volunteers like you in the packing and handling of the debian software
packages.

But do we really need a game like this in the debian distribution, given the
casualties and problems which drugs, there use and the dealing cause.

Please think over it and remove this package and others with comparable
content. You might find other packages which deserve your time better.

Thanks for reading my notice

Christof Adams

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
19 Comments
Re: dopewars do we need such a game in debian distribution?         


Author: Nico Golde
Date: Feb 27, 2008 06:50

Hi Christof,
* Christof Adams [2008-02-27 15:22]:
> I am a long time user of debian. In the updating process i found the
> programm "dopewars" you maintain. As a user i much apreciate the work of
> volunteers like you in the packing and handling of the debian software
> packages.
>
> But do we really need a game like this in the debian distribution, given the
> casualties and problems which drugs, there use and the dealing cause.
>
> Please think over it and remove this package and others with comparable
> content. You might find other packages which deserve your time better.

Debian is called the universal OS, not the drug free OS.
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
Show full article (1.03Kb)
no comments
Re: dopewars do we need such a game in debian distribution?         


Author: Stephen Gran
Date: Feb 27, 2008 07:40

This one time, at band camp, Christof Adams said:
>
> Hallo Francois,
>
> I am a long time user of debian. In the updating process i found the
> programm "dopewars" you maintain. As a user i much apreciate the work of
> volunteers like you in the packing and handling of the debian software
> packages.
>
> But do we really need a game like this in the debian distribution, given the
> casualties and problems which drugs, there use and the dealing cause.
>
> Please think over it and remove this package and others with comparable
> content. You might find other packages which deserve your time better.
Show full article (1.68Kb)
no comments
Re: dopewars do we need such a game in debian distribution?         


Author: Dossy Shiobara
Date: Feb 27, 2008 08:10

On 2008.02.27, Stephen Gran debian.org> wrote:
> I think it is useful to remember that many people have different
> thresholds for what they find offensive or funny.

Similar to non-free, perhaps Debian needs to have its packages moved to
drug-free, leaving packages like dopewars behind?

:-). :-). :-)

(Apply extra smileys liberally as needed.)

--
Dossy Shiobara | dossy@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly
-- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
no comments
Re: dopewars do we need such a game in debian distribution?         


Author: Nico Golde
Date: Feb 27, 2008 08:40

Hi Stephen,
* Stephen Gran debian.org> [2008-02-27 16:40]:
> This one time, at band camp, Christof Adams said:
>> I am a long time user of debian. In the updating process i found the
>> programm "dopewars" you maintain. As a user i much apreciate the work of
>> volunteers like you in the packing and handling of the debian software
>> packages.
>>
>> But do we really need a game like this in the debian distribution, given the
>> casualties and problems which drugs, there use and the dealing cause.
>>
>> Please think over it and remove this package and others with comparable
>> content. You might find other packages which deserve your time better.
>
> I think it is useful to remember that many people have different
> thresholds for what they find offensive or funny. So far, it has been
> Debian's policy to allow software into the distribution provided there is
> someone to maintain it (caveats about varying levels of maintainership
> aside). We are too broad a project to have a single set of values,
> and I think it wouldn't be all that useful to try to impose one. ...
Show full article (1.62Kb)
no comments
Re: dopewars do we need such a game in debian distribution?         


Author: Kevin Mark
Date: Feb 27, 2008 09:10

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:00:27AM -0500, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
> On 2008.02.27, Stephen Gran debian.org> wrote:
>> I think it is useful to remember that many people have different
>> thresholds for what they find offensive or funny.
>
> Similar to non-free, perhaps Debian needs to have its packages moved to
> drug-free, leaving packages like dopewars behind?
>
> :-). :-). :-)
>
> (Apply extra smileys liberally as needed.)
>
There was a recent incident with Wikipedia about it containing a page
with the image of mohammad. Muslims wanted this to be removed. Wikipedia
stood up for free speech and did not remove this image. The idea is that
free speech should be allowed and the choice should be left up to the
individual. So if you don't want to install/use a piece of software,
don't install/use it. Debian has various packages that contain
potentially offensive matter like the fortune packages. Debian also has
a subproject for children, so maybe you can use that installer to ensure ...
Show full article (1.80Kb)
no comments
Re: dopewars do we need such a game in debian distribution?         


Author: Christian Surchi
Date: Feb 27, 2008 09:40

On mer, 2008-02-27 at 15:00 +0100, Christof Adams wrote:
> Hallo Francois,
>
> I am a long time user of debian. In the updating process i found the
> programm "dopewars" you maintain. As a user i much apreciate the work of
> volunteers like you in the packing and handling of the debian software
> packages.
>
> But do we really need a game like this in the debian distribution, given the
> casualties and problems which drugs, there use and the dealing cause.

Oh, yes, of course, and I think we shouldn't also allow to be the
criminal Mr. X in our "londonlaw" package! ;-P

"...one player controls the movements of the criminal
Mr. X as he tries to evade Scotland Yard..."

bye
Christian

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
no comments
Re: dopewars do we need such a game in debian distribution?         


Author: Stephen Gran
Date: Feb 27, 2008 10:20

This one time, at band camp, Nico Golde said:
> At least w3bfukk0r was not allowed
> to get into the archive because of its offensive name and
> hot-babe also never made its way into the archive.

You mean they were actually rejected by the ftp-master's, or you mean
the discussion convinced the maintainers not to upload? I honestly
don't know for the first, and my impression for the second was that all
the shouting convinced the prospective maintainer not to bother. I
don't see giving up and being told no as the same things.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| ,''`. Stephen Gran |
| : :' : sgran@debian.org |
| `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer |
| `- http://www.debian.org |
-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Show full article (1.14Kb)
no comments
Re: dopewars do we need such a game in debian distribution?         


Author: Julien Cristau
Date: Feb 27, 2008 10:30

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 18:13:12 +0000, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Nico Golde said:
>> At least w3bfukk0r was not allowed
>> to get into the archive because of its offensive name and
>> hot-babe also never made its way into the archive.
>
> You mean they were actually rejected by the ftp-master's, or you mean
> the discussion convinced the maintainers not to upload? I honestly
> don't know for the first, and my impression for the second was that all
> the shouting convinced the prospective maintainer not to bother. I
> don't see giving up and being told no as the same things.

jcristau@merkel:/org/ftp.debian.org$ grep hot-babe log/*
log/2004-11:20041130164722|jennifer|Moving to new|hot-babe_0.2.0-1_powerpc.changes
log/2004-12:20041204200222|jennifer|Moving to new|hot-babe_0.2.1-1_powerpc.changes
log/2005-01:20050127093213|jennifer|Moving to new|hot-babe_0.2.2-1_powerpc.changes
log/2005-05:20050528100002|lisa|rejected|hot-babe_0.2.2-1_powerpc.changes
log/2005-05:20050528100014|lisa|rejected|hot-babe_0.2.1-1_powerpc.changes
log/2005-05:20050528100016|lisa|rejected|hot-babe_0.2.0-1_powerpc.changes

I can't find the reason, so you'd have to ask Jörg about that.
Show full article (1.44Kb)
no comments
Re: dopewars do we need such a game in debian distribution?         


Author: Josselin Mouette
Date: Feb 27, 2008 10:50

Le mercredi 27 février 2008 à 15:00 +0100, Christof Adams a écrit :
> Please think over it and remove this package and others with comparable
> content. You might find other packages which deserve your time better.

I agree. We should for example remove bible-kjv, which contains shocking
texts recommending to lapidate people. Given the casualties still caused
by lapidation and the seriousness of this human rights violation, we
should remove this package from the archive.

--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
`- our own. Resistance is futile.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHxa+DrSla4ddfhTMRArrQAKCj5/9tvSxzz1QserXIxvtWurld3QCg0C/B
wCNWryp6OdrRflln3a4/x04=
=UEOv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
no comments
1 2