> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:24:52AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:

>>> Non-free is there just because the free counterparts aren't optimal. Someday
>>> these will, and non-free will just disappear from Debian :)

>>
>> Non-free is for GNU documentation.

>
> I think we should consider (post-lenny) splitting up non-free in a
> couple of sub-categories. Personally, I'd prefer "fsf-free", but
> "non-free-docs" would be just as good, besides "non-free-firmware" and
> "non-free" for the rest.