Group: linux.debian.project · Group Profile
Author: Michael BanckMichael Banck Date: Sep 17, 2008 10:20
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:24:52AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
>> Non-free is there just because the free counterparts aren't optimal. Someday
>> these will, and non-free will just disappear from Debian :)
>
> Non-free is for GNU documentation.
I think we should consider (post-lenny) splitting up non-free in a
couple of sub-categories. Personally, I'd prefer "fsf-free", but
"non-free-docs" would be just as good, besides "non-free-firmware" and
"non-free" for the rest.
Michael
| 
