MJ Ray
phonecoop.coop> Forwarded From: Sven Luther
: [...]> Your above condition, 2 different DDs, seems really slow to me, if you
> want to put a bottom limit, i would maybe chose the quorum of debian
> votes or something such meaningful.
Equally, 50 seems far too high to me. I'd be surprised if 50 DDs are
active in mediation at one time.
> Furthermore, I believe that any person who is actually willing to
> participate in a debian-mediation mailing lists, will probably be able
> to configure procmail or another filtering software to avoir reading
> unwanted posts, or simply ignore them in their mail reader.
I think that's unacceptable for three reasons: firstly, it repeats
work (all N subscribers updating their filters); secondly, the
archives become less useful; thirdly, someone behaving badly enough to
get banned from a list of mediators *really* needs to know that.
> That said, this brings another proposal. I believe that for the sake of
> transparency, we should set up a debian-censorship, [...]
Clearly, such a list cannot be hosted by the project, because if
messages were appearing, they would not be censored. If such a list
is set up somewhere, I'll ask the listmasters to include it in any
SMTP error when a message is rejected. I don't think it can
necessarily be included in other filters without blowback.
Regards,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see
http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow
http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
