Hello Everybody,

I'm trying to install Intel Fortran Compiler 9.1.036 on my Debian AMD64 Opteron Box. Unfortunely, i can't use gnu fortran to compile the application i want (http://www.cpmd.org/), because it needs the 'Cray Pointer' extension to Fortran 77 for dynamical memory management. According to http://www.theochem.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/~axel.kohlmeyer/cpmd-linux.html
doesn't handle the above extension. So I have to use Intel's compiler, that is free of charge, but not open source :-( .

During the installation process, the following message appears:

The installation program was not able to detect the IA32 version of the following libraries installed :
libstdc++
libgcc
glibc

Without these libraries, the compiler will not function properly.
These libraries, if not installed, can be installed from
the OS discs after finishing the compiler installation.
Please refer to Release Notes for more information.

Can I have both versions of glibc (64 and 32) installed? Any packages names?

Thanks for your answers.....

[]'s

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Search
Música para ver e ouvir: You're Beautiful, do James Blunt

Hello Everybody,I'm trying to install Intel Fortran Compiler 9.1.036 on my Debian AMD64 Opteron Box. Unfortunely, i can't use gnu fortran to compile the application i want (http://www.cpmd.org/), because ...

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 05:00:20PM +0000, Jo?o Marcelo wrote:

That page is wrong. As mentioned in the main CPMD FAQ, gfortran can compile
CPMD.

Paul

On Tuesday 12 September 2006 18:00, João Marcelo wrote:

The latest GNU gFortran has the extensions you need and will produce a 64-bit
native executable optimised for an AMD processor, rather than one optimised
for an inferior brand of 32-bit processor.

You should *never* install *any* software which does not come with source
code -- you don't know where it's been. If the software vendor isn't
prepared to show you the source code, that's a clear sign that there is
something in there that they don't want you to see.

You wouldn't buy a cake that didn't have a list of ingredients on the box,
would you?

Dňa Ut 12. September 2006 19:31 Lennart Sorensen napísal:

A J Stiles wrote:

Hi,

Well, i really hope that some day gnu fortran can be as good as or even better than the others fortran compilers. I don't like closed source software and i think that the gnu c compiler is way better than any other C compiler. I'm a CS student and i don't love fortran. To me, it would really be great if all the researchers here in my college took some C lessons. But since I'm a employee, i'll have to install Intel Fortran.
For those interested, here:

http://www.theochem.uwa.edu.au/fortran/intel_on_debian

Worked just fine. But if you can, stick to gfortran. Let's make this world a better place.

Jo Shields comlab.ox.ac.uk> escreveu: A J Stiles wrote:

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:12:57AM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:

Some do. At least in places that care about beer quality. :)

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:06:44AM -0300, Jo?o Marcelo wrote:

Well gcc is certainly top compiler for portability. For optimization it
leaves a lot to be desired, but it is something that is being worked on,
although getting people to volunteer time to make optimizer code is
probably hard. It is hardly glorious code that lots of people will
notice you for, and probably not very exciting code either. They will
notice if you do it wrong though. :)

Jo Shields wrote: