Blade 100 and 2.6.{22,23}
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
linux.debian.ports.sparc only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

linux.debian.ports.sparc Profile…
 Up
Blade 100 and 2.6.{22,23}         


Author: Luigi Gangitano
Date: Dec 20, 2007 05:30

Hi sparcers,
since last official debian kernel running on my SunBlade100 is
2.6.21-2, today I investigated what is going wrong in 2.6.22 and
2.6.23. Both kernels hang at boot with and without the video=atyfb:off
parameter.

A -p output of 2.6.23 follows, it seems that while scanning the PCI
bus devices get added multiple times. For the record 0000:00:03.0 is
the PMU and 07.0 is the ISA bridge.

Any ideas?

Regards,

L

Boot device: disk2 File and args:
SILO Version 1.4.13
boot: Linux video=atyfb:off -p
Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x40000000 for kernel
Uncompressing image...
Loaded kernel version 2.6.23
Loading initial...
Show full article (6.29Kb)
3 Comments
Re: Blade 100 and 2.6.{22,23}         


Author: Jim Watson
Date: Dec 20, 2007 12:50

Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> Hi sparcers,
> since last official debian kernel running on my SunBlade100 is
> 2.6.21-2, today I investigated what is going wrong in 2.6.22 and
> 2.6.23. Both kernels hang at boot with and without the video=atyfb:off
> parameter.
>
> A -p output of 2.6.23 follows, it seems that while scanning the PCI
> bus devices get added multiple times. For the record 0000:00:03.0 is
> the PMU and 07.0 is the ISA bridge.
>
> Any ideas?
Hi,

I am running on SunBlade100 with 2.6.23-rc4 that I built from the
upstream sources (not debian) as I found that does not need any boot
parameters. Some earlier versions I think had errors if a firewire
device is plugged in.

jim@sun:~$ uname -a
Linux sun 2.6.23-rc4 #1 Sun Sep 2 09:33:06 EST 2007 sparc64 GNU/Linux
Show full article (4.27Kb)
no comments
Re: Blade 100 and 2.6.{22,23}         


Author: Uwe A. P. Würdinger
Date: Dec 20, 2007 13:30

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Luigi Gangitano schrieb:
> Hi sparcers,
> since last official debian kernel running on my SunBlade100 is
> 2.6.21-2, today I investigated what is going wrong in 2.6.22 and
> 2.6.23. Both kernels hang at...
Show full article (8.37Kb)
no comments
Re: Blade 100 and 2.6.{22,23}         


Author: Josip Rodin
Date: Dec 21, 2007 01:20

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 02:19:17PM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> kobject_add failed for 0000:00:07.0 with -EEXIST, don't try to
> register things with the same name in the sa.
> kobject_add failed for 0000:00:03.0 with -EEXIST, don't try to
> register things with the same name in the sa.

I vaguely recall seeing fixes for these kinds of things in the kernel
changelogs - post that to sparclinux@vger so the kernel people see it.

--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
no comments