linux.debian.ports.hppa
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
linux.debian.ports.hppa only
 
Advanced search
December 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
1234567 49
891011121314 50
15161718192021 51
22232425262728 52
293031     1
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
linux.debian.ports.hppa Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  successful install         


Author: Dirk Van Hertem
Date: Dec 26, 2008 08:30

Hello all,

Just a short note that the debian lenny installer
(debian-testing-hppa-netinst.iso) installed without any problems on my
"new" hppa B2000 over serial console. I don't think I ever installed a
debian more easily. This B2000 will be used as my new home file and
webserver...

Keep up the good work!

Dirk
--
Dirk Van Hertem Dirk.VanHertem@esat.kuleuven.be
Electrical Engineering Department http://www.esat.kuleuven.be/electa
K.U. Leuven, ESAT-ELECTA tel: +32-16-32.18.95
10, Kasteelpark Arenberg, B-3001 Heverlee fax: +32-16-32.19.85

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hppa-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
1 Comment
  Re: HPPA and lenny         


Author: dann frazier
Date: Dec 24, 2008 10:00

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 01:05:55PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:47:25AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>> dann frazier wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:08:59PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>>>> dann frazier wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>>>>>> Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezember 2008:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matt Taggart wrote:
>>>>>>>> The real problem is that no one is fixing hppa kernel problems. I don't see
>>>>>>>> much point in keeping the archive up to date if nobody is working on fixing
>>>>>>>> the kernel (not currently and I suspect not in the future either). This has
>>>>>>>> been stated on the debian-hppa list several times over a long period and in
>>>>>>>> that time no one (AFAIK) has stepped up to work on it.
>>>>>>> Matt,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We have done quite some bugfixing in the last weeks and upstream
>>>>>>> 2.6.28-rcX works pretty well now.
>>>>>> What does that mean for the lenny 2.6.26 kernel?
>>>>> Well, obviously when there's a fix upstream we will look at ...
Show full article (2.90Kb)
no comments
  Which Gigabyte Network Cards are supported?         


Author: Lothar Scholz
Date: Sep 8, 2008 20:50

Hello,

I want to add a faster Ethernet Card to my C3700.
Which PC cards are supported?

Realtek, 3COM, all the cards that run on Intel Linux?

--
Best regards,
Lothar Scholz mailto:scholz@scriptolutions.com

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hppa-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
2 Comments
  Re: Debian parisc config for 2.6.26 broke the real time clock         


Author: Bastian Blank
Date: Sep 8, 2008 09:40

On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 10:06:26AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Parisc is a CONFIG_GEN_RTC architecture (we use the generic real time
> clock driver).

Well.
> Starting with 2.6.26, debian is now enabling
> CONFIG_RTC_CLASS (for platforms with specific RTC drivers) which
> disables CONFIG_GEN_RTC and means that hwclock (and ntp tracking) are
> broken on parisc with debian kernels 2.6.26 and above.

Yes. Most arches already needs it anyway.
> All of the arch/parisc/config files get this right, so someone at debian
> must have screwed up somehow. The config option CONFIG_RTC_CLASS must
> be set to 'N' for all parisc systems.

Apparently hppa uses its special rtc type. I propose that you take a
look at drivers/rtc/rtc-ppc.c and write a wrapper rtc module.
> I'd suggest checking the debian
> kernel configs against the in-tree default files to see if there are any
> other cockups like this.

If there are, this are bugs in the kernel themself. I'm no hppa
developer so I won't waste my time with such.
Show full article (1.36Kb)
13 Comments
  Re: NTPL transition         


Author: Petr Salinger
Date: Sep 6, 2008 02:10

> To be technically correct this is a "static initialized lock" using
> something like PTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT. We must version every function that
> could have had a statically initialized lock, and at the start of said
> function, check the lock words and reset as appropriate. This involves
> a) Detect parisc-lt {1,1,1,1} and convert that to {0,0,0,0} b) If the
> last word in the lock[4] is zero then do nothing. Note that with
> parisc-nptl only the first word is used for locking and it doesn't
> have to be more than int aligned.

IMHO, there is no need for versioning. Moreover it wouldn't be sufficient.

Imagine function in a shared library foo which takes as argument
pthread_mutex_t and does usual:

pthread_mutex_lock()
do some work
pthread_mutex_unlock()
Show full article (1.56Kb)
3 Comments
  NTPL transition         


Author: Domenico Andreoli
Date: Sep 4, 2008 04:50

Hi all,

I would set NPTL transition as a goal for queeze.

Are we available to agree on a shared path to push new life to this port?
I mean, this issue will bite more and more frequently, it must be fixed.

I am available to follow the required steps but obviously the more eyes
the better. This is the first time I work on a big transition like this.

I think the first packages have to be cross-built, until a minimal
build system is ready to run on the new libc6.1 (chroot?). Then start
an archive rebuild. It looks easy, where is the trap? :)

cheers,
Domenico

-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://www.dandreoli.com/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Show full article (0.91Kb)
13 Comments
  D entists Directory in the United States         


Author: Pham V Santos
Date: Sep 3, 2008 20:00

Enhance your marketing efforts with this:

--> 164,632 D entists
--> 158,292 Civic Addresses
--> 163,660 Phone Nos
--> 77,123 Office Fax #
--> 45,829 E-Mail Addresses

This week only the price has been reduced to $298, you save $200!

Write an email to RaulDennis@fceating.com for additional info

email hy456@fceating.com for delisting

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hppa-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
no comments
  de-bug on hppa?         


Author: Geoff
Date: Sep 1, 2008 00:30

Hi Guys,
Can anyone recommend a de-bugging tool for hppa? I am trying to work with a
software author who doesn't have a hppa box. He has asked for a valgrind
trace/output but it appears that valgrind has never been ported to hppa? I
have used gdb but it doesn't give enough detail (or so it seems). Any ideas
or recommendations will be appreciated.

Cheers, Geoff.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hppa-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
3 Comments
  compiling 64-bit binaries?         


Author: Brian Szymanski
Date: Aug 28, 2008 19:40

Hello all...

2 new questions from the proud new owner of an old PA-RISC machine :-)

Is it possible to compile 64 bit binaries on debian/hppa ? All the docs
out there seem to indicate no, but there is a 64-bit kernel available on
the architecture, so I figure there must be some way to compile 64-bit
binaries -- unless the kernels were compiled hpux?

Also, how vital do you all think the hppa port is - will it still be
supported in lenny and beyond?

Thanks a bunch!

--
Brian Szymanski
email: skibrianski@gmail.com

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hppa-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
1 Comment
  Re: need hppa access to fix maxima         


Author: Domenico Andreoli
Date: Aug 28, 2008 08:10

Hi,

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:38:48AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings! Sarti and paer are down, peri and the other one are
> restricted.
>
> Should be simple if I can get access.

Feel free to send me you public ssh key in a signed email. I have an HPPA box for you.

cheers,
Domenico

-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://www.dandreoli.com/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAki2vqMACgkQBneQM6IOvFBWBACfboqmqQBdac7o6Pv6YsMSlXpY
DzcAn3Dq7hE1Iw6qsJIIZehnRwwDvRP9
=39YR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9