Hi,

would you please take over maintenance of pperl? I've fixed a
RC-but-not-marked-as-such bug which prevented it from working on 64-bit
architectures, and the package should be in relatively good shape again.
The test suite also passes when it's compiled with Perl 5.10, and it's
now run on package built.

Thanks,
Florian

-=| Florian Weimer, Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:43:00PM +0200 |=-

pperl seems a bit outside of pkg-perl scope to me. It is not a Perl
module package.

OTOH, we already have perlconsole so there is a precedent.

What do others think?

--
dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIJBtHHqjlqpcl9jsRAlBgAKCwgxyjb7hi3WtsSLA/f748u/9kbgCfU/iF
wMhixa838gegZbe0K0117l4=
=DqJD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Fri, 09 May 2008 12:37:11 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:

It has one script and one module, so it's in the "grey" area :)

I'd say, let's take it.

Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
: :' : debian gnu/linux user, admin & developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/
`- NP: Rod Stewart: You Wear It Well

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

-=| gregor herrmann, Fri, May 09, 2008 at 01:44:04PM +0200 |=-

I am on it.

--
dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)