linux.debian.maint.perl
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
linux.debian.maint.perl only
 
Advanced search
May 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
   1234 18
567891011 19
12131415161718 20
19202122232425 21
262728293031  22
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
linux.debian.maint.perl Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Re: Bug#460608: Fails to rewrite files in /etc/suck         


Author: Laurent Bigonville
Date: May 12, 2008 10:20

Hi,

Could someone have a look at bug #460608[1]. I cannot reproduce the bug,
I checked the code and it seems fine.

Thanks

Laurent Bigonville

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460608

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-perl-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
no comments
  RFH: Problem with pod2man/*roff         


Author: Martín Ferrari
Date: May 12, 2008 08:40

Hi there,

when preparing a new upstream release of libpoe-component-irc-perl
using perl5.10, I got lost of lintian warnings about manpages:

W: libpoe-component-irc-perl: manpage-has-errors-from-man
usr/share/man/man3/POE::Component::IRC.3pm.gz 1442: `\-' is not
allowed in an escape name

Gregor and I tracked this down to the way that E is converted
since perl 5.10:

Original POD:

Hinrik Ern SigurEsson gmail.com>

perl 5.10 pod2man:

Hinrik O\*:rn Sigur\*(d\-sson gmail.com>

perl 5.8 pod2man:

Hinrik O\*:rn Sigur\*(d-sson gmail.com>

The minimal testcase can be obtained with the following oneliner:

echo -e '=pod\n\nE' | pod2man | tail -1

I'm asking here, because I don't know much about *roff and friends, so
maybe someone can say if this is actually a pod2man bug or not.

THanks.
Show full article (1.03Kb)
1 Comment
  Bug#480458: RM: libversion-perl -- ROM; included in perl-modules (5.10)         


Author: Niko Tyni
Date: May 12, 2008 05:50

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:45:47AM +0000, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> tag 480458 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi, with a huge number of reverse build-dependencies, I think this needs a better
> plan.
> ** spf-tools-perl has an unsatisfied dependency on i386: libversion-perl
> ** libconfig-json-perl has an unsatisfied dependency on i386: libversion-perl
[...]

Hi,

perl-modules Provides: libversion-perl since 5.10.0, and none of
those 25 or so packages have a versioned dependency (which can't be
provided).

The non-build-dependencies shouldn't be a problem, apt will select
perl-modules instead just like it does with libnet-perl currently.

As for building, perl-modules is currently always installed because
dpkg-dev is build-essential and pulls it in. It's not build-essential
itself, though.
Show full article (1.42Kb)
3 Comments