|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Dan JacobsonDan Jacobson Date: Oct 2, 2006 11:00
I used to work at Bell Labs. There was a very large management
training effort to correct things like abusive behavior between
co-workers, etc. You might say that that was a profit making company,
and Debian is not, but I am sure the values still apply.
http://bugs.debian.org/390564 was my suggestion, based on
http://bugs.debian.org/389892
Abusive members give the message that no interaction is welcome. Bug
reports and fixes will be few. Development stifled. A wall built.
Simpleminded co-workers do not hurt the organization as much as
abusive co-workers.
You might want to have related workshops at the next Debian
conference or seminars. The leadership team should get involved.
|
| |
|
| | 7 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Frans PopFrans Pop Date: Oct 2, 2006 11:40
On Monday 02 October 2006 17:15, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> You might want to have related workshops at the next Debian
> conference or seminars. The leadership team should get involved.
Try filing better bug reports instead. I don't see _any_ rationale in
#390564 why the maintainer should add the Suggests.
Do you really think it is strange that people dismiss your bug reports if
you habitually fail to present them decently?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBFIVyLgm/Kwh6ICoQRAte7AKCfM0b8qzOruLEIgFQne9SDPaOQQwCeN9jQ
8KDZKPgPNkSjpxggU7dEwOU=
=JnMD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Nico GoldeNico Golde Date: Oct 2, 2006 14:10
Hi Dan,
* Dan Jacobson jidanni.org> [2006-10-02 20:18]:
> I used to work at Bell Labs. There was a very large management
> training effort to correct things like abusive behavior between
> co-workers...
|
| Show full article (1.26Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Maarten VerwijsMaarten Verwijs Date: Oct 2, 2006 16:00
Good evening,
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Try filing better bug reports instead.
Since this is an ongoing problem, how about the following:
helpdesk@ debian.org
Please consider:
1) Endusers and bugreports often do not mix well.
2) Developers and 'Stupid Bugreports' often do not mix well.
Putting a third entity between those two groups could be the sollution
to this.
|
| Show full article (1.62Kb) |
| 4 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Frank KüsterFrank Küster Date: Oct 3, 2006 00:40
Maarten Verwijs projectie.com> wrote:
> Since this is an ongoing problem, how about the following:
> helpdesk@ debian.org
We already have the users lists.
> What could be possible if Debian had an official Helpdesk Department?
> * End-Users could ask *any* question and actually get a nice answer.
> * End-Users can report bugs, but these are first checked by helpdeskers,
> before they are commited.
> * Bugreports would end up more specific and detailed
> * Developers would only have to communicate with Knowledgeable Helpdesk
> Users.
Also developers are only users of packages if they have no idea of the
internals. The degree of specificity and detail in bugreports to the
TeX package that we get does not at all seem to depend on developer
status, but rather on whether the person has knowledge about TeX and its
internals (e.g. what "generating a format" means, a frequent problem
when a postinst fails). And I guess the bug reports I make against
firefox or that I would make against mysql (never found one so far)
aren't or wouldn't be any better.
|
| Show full article (1.53Kb) |
| 3 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Frank KüsterFrank Küster Date: Oct 3, 2006 04:40
Maarten Verwijs projectie.com> wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> First off: Thanks for thinking this through and answering.
>
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:33:52AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
>> Maarten Verwijs projectie.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Since this is an ongoing problem, how about the following:
>>> helpdesk@ debian.org
>>
>> We already have the users lists.
>
> The users-lists do provide a lot of the functions of a helpdesk.
> They also miss a few things a good helpdesk has:
>
> * Prioritization: Important issues will get addressed first. Unimportant
> issues will still get addressed, only later.
|
| Show full article (3.77Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Bernhard R. LinkBernhard R. Link Date: Oct 3, 2006 05:20
* Maarten Verwijs projectie.com> [061003 12:32]:
> * Prioritization: Important issues will get addressed first. Unimportant
> issues will still get addressed, only later.
If someone implement some kind of help-desk, please implement a hook for
maintainers to subscribe for problems with their packages. I'd rather
have a dozen stupid and/or pointless bug-reports more per week than
having any problems of my packages hidden from me in some help-desk tracker
because someone deems them not important enough to bring them in a nice
form to be submitted to me. (Bonus points for something pts like that
also allows upstream maintainers to hook in)
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Frank KüsterFrank Küster Date: Oct 3, 2006 05:30
"Bernhard R. Link" debian.org> wrote:
> * Maarten Verwijs projectie.com> [061003 12:32]:
>> * Prioritization: Important issues will get addressed first. Unimportant
>> issues will still get addressed, only later.
>
> If someone implement some kind of help-desk, please implement a hook for
> maintainers to subscribe for problems with their packages. I'd rather
> have a dozen stupid and/or pointless bug-reports more per week than
> having any problems of my packages hidden from me in some help-desk tracker
> because someone deems them not important enough to bring them in a nice
> form to be submitted to me. (Bonus points for something pts like that
> also allows upstream maintainers to hook in)
Seconded.
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|