possible problem with ftp.us.debian.org
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
linux.debian.devel only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

linux.debian.devel Profile…
 Up
possible problem with ftp.us.debian.org         


Author: Nikita V. Youshchenko
Date: Jan 6, 2007 23:40

Hello.

Since some time I noticed that after some executions of 'apt-get update'
I'm getting 'md5sum mismatch errors'.

I've just tracked this thing down.
My apt setup used apt-cacher, whith 3 mirrors configured: ftp.de.deban.org,
ftp.uk.debian.org and ftp.us.debian.org [probably this is default setup].

And the problem was caused by ftp.us.debian.org entry.
This looks like round-robin dns:

nikita@blacky:~> host ftp.us.debian.org
ftp.us.debian.org has address 128.101.240.212
ftp.us.debian.org has address 204.152.191.7
ftp.us.debian.org has address 35.9.37.225

Out of these 3 IPs, 35.9.37.225 and 128.101.240.212
have /debian/dists/testing/Release file dated Jan 06, but 204.152.191.7
has the same file dated Jan 02 and with different content.
Show full article (1.40Kb)
5 Comments
Re: possible problem with ftp.us.debian.org         


Author: Amaya
Date: Jan 7, 2007 22:20

Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> Months;

Confirmed.
> I've had to switch 10's of clients to use ftp.debian.org instead since
> I've been getting intermittant problems like this with
> ftp.us.debian.org since ~ October last year.

~-root@aenima>head /etc/hosts
#35.9.37.225 http.us.debian.org
128.101.240.212 http.us.debian.org

I switch between the two of them. They are the two that work best.
Which reminds me that I should switch to a European Mirror :)

--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
: :' : -- Emma Goldman
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
1 Comment
Re: possible problem with ftp.us.debian.org         


Author: Andrew Donnellan
Date: Jan 7, 2007 22:30

On 1/8/07, Amaya debian.org> wrote:
> Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
>> Months;
>
> Confirmed.
>
>> I've had to switch 10's of clients to use ftp.debian.org instead since
>> I've been getting intermittant problems like this with
>> ftp.us.debian.org since ~ October last year.

I've had to switch between ftp.debian.org, ftp.us.debian.org,
ftp.au.debian.org, mirror.linux.org.au, ftp.uk.debian.org, because
I've had problems with all of them at some point or another.

--
Andrew Donnellan
ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary) ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure)
http://andrewdonnellan.com http://ajdlinux.wordpress.com
ajdlinux@jabber.org.au hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58
http://linux.org.au http://debian.org
Get free rewards - http://ezyrewards.com/?id=23484
Show full article (0.96Kb)
no comments
Re: possible problem with ftp.us.debian.org         


Date: Jan 7, 2007 23:30

On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:40:17 -0700, "Wesley J. Landaker"
icecavern.net> wrote:
>On Saturday 06 January 2007 15:31, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
>> later - the md5sum mismatch errors started some weeks ago and do happen
> ^^^^^
>
>Months; I've had to switch 10's of clients to use ftp.debian.org instead
>since I've been getting intermittant problems like this with
>ftp.us.debian.org since ~ October last year.

That's why I have a local CNAME debian.debian.zugschlus.de which I try
to have pointing to a working germany-based mirror most of the time.
Saves me from updating all clients in case of a mirror failure.

Greetings
Marc

--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
1 Comment
Re: possible problem with ftp.us.debian.org         


Date: Jan 9, 2007 20:00

On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 08:37:28 -0500, Matthias Julius
julius-net.net> wrote:
>Marc Haber writes:
>> That's why I have a local CNAME debian.debian.zugschlus.de which I try
>> to have pointing to a working germany-based mirror most of the time.
>> Saves me from updating all clients in case of a mirror failure.
>
>If you have more than a few clients it might be a good idea to have
>your own private mirror. Then, if your upstream mirror has a
>temporary problem your private one will be a little bit out of date,
>but your clients won't notice.

I don't think that is superior to my CNAME solution if the systems are
distributed. Larger sites can have a squid with holding time for .deb
files beefed up.
>And your clients will get a faster
>response, too.

Only if the mirror is in the local network, which means that all
clients should be in the same LAN.
Show full article (1.22Kb)
no comments
etch-proposed-updates amd64 Release file fails checksum [Was: possible problem with ftp.us.debian.org]         


Author: Yaroslav Halchenko
Date: May 27, 2007 23:00

Dear Developers,

I found a problem with our package repository for
amd64 in etch-proposed-updates.

More than a month ago I filed a bug report
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418956
which was merged with another one later on
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419505
but problem persists and no workarounds were mentioned.

IIRC amd64 is the 2nd most popular architecture, and most of the people
use proposed-updates, I just wonder if there is any workaround, or when
the issue gets resolved.

Thanks in advance for ideas
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
Show full article (0.99Kb)
no comments