|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Wang YanWang Yan
Date: Jul 29, 2008 17:40
Good Day,
I am a staff of Private Banking Services at the Bank of China (BOC). I am contacting you concerning our customer and, an investment placed under our banks management 3 years ago.I have contacted you independently of our investigation and no one is informed of this communication.
I would like to intimate you with certain facts that I believe would be of interest to you.
Kindly confirm your interest and respond to my private email as below to enable give you the full details.(wg4yan@ yahoo.com.hk)
Thank you as i will appreciate your kind response.
Best Regards,
Wang Yan.
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Leo JacksonLeo Jackson
Date: Jul 26, 2008 21:10
To Whom It May Concern,
I would like to help..in any way you need it Fix
orphaned packages, Fix orphaned packages to the
maintainers I am also talking to developer to become a
developer..I have been coding for 11 years and
scripting making web pages and lots of other items..
I was a developer for IBM and Microsoft I am on
several open source packages and programs..I just want
to help..
Thank You,
Leo Albert Jackson Jr
Owner Head Programmer
LJ's Electronics and Software
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: David BremnerDavid Bremner
Date: Jul 26, 2008 15:50
The maxima package has an unacknowledged RC bug from early April, and
an unacknowledged NMU from January.
I have some (ever slimmer) hope of better version of maxima in Lenny,
and I would be willing to adopt the package to make that happen. I
would be happy to turn the package back over to Camm if and when he
expresses interest.
I have almost certainly not waited long enough for Camm to respond to my offer
of adoption, but on the other hand, I get the feeling based on looking
at BTS that he is not able to respond to email these days.
If "instant adoption" causes more prolems than it solves, I can always
make a backport later.
All the best,
David
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: dann frazierdann frazier
Date: Jul 25, 2008 14:10
reassign 492377 mksh
thanks
The seriousness of this bug is actually caused by the fact that we
will be unable to do ia64 updates of mksh because the ia64 buildd will
reject them. This doesn't mean it needs to be fixed in mksh of course,
but mksh cannot release until it is fixed somehow, so the bug should
remain here.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 06:57:43PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> As for a possible solution, I don???t think that adding an exemption of
> mksh to the checker is worth the effort, but I can???t think of a modifi-
> cation to the test that would NOT trigger the warning while staying
> warning-free in all other cases (as the test is EXPECTED to fail on
> Debian with Fefe???s dietlibc). Maybe I could play some sed magic to
> fool the regex your scanner uses, so that it doesn???t recognise warnings
> emitted during the configuration process? This would then be a Debian-
> specific kludge and NOT go in upstream. If you have any BETTER solutions,
> please let me know.
|
| Show full article (1.38Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Debian Bug Tracking SystemDebian Bug Tracking System
Date: Jul 25, 2008 14:10
> reassign 492377 mksh
Bug#492377: mksh: strcasestr implicitly converted to pointer
Bug reassigned from package ` qa.debian.org' to `mksh'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|