linux.debian.bugs.rc
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
linux.debian.bugs.rc only
 
Advanced search
December 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
1234567 49
891011121314 50
15161718192021 51
22232425262728 52
293031     1
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
linux.debian.bugs.rc Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Processed: Re: Bug#509832: FTBFS when byacc is installed         


Author: Debian Bug Tracking System
Date: Dec 26, 2008 16:20

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 509832 important
Bug#509832: FTBFS when byacc is installed
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
no comments
  Bug#509285: marked as done (FTBFS Time expired during tests/mbr-4 and others)         


Author: Debian Bug Tracking System
Date: Dec 26, 2008 16:20

> From: Debian Bug Tracking System owner@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Bug#509285: fixed in mbr 1.1.10-2
> Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 00:02:05 +0000
> Source: mbr
> Source-Version: 1.1.10-2
>
> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
> mbr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
>
> mbr_1.1.10-2.diff.gz
> to pool/main/m/mbr/mbr_1.1.10-2.diff.gz
> mbr_1.1.10-2.dsc
> to pool/main/m/mbr/mbr_1.1.10-2.dsc
> mbr_1.1.10-2_i386.deb
> to pool/main/m/mbr/mbr_1.1.10-2_i386.deb
>
>
>
> A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
> attached. ...
Show full article (6.34Kb)
no comments
  Bug#507165: patch         


Author: Darren Salt
Date: Dec 26, 2008 15:00

I demand that sean finney may or may not have written...
> attached is what i believe is a patch for this problem against the version
> in unstable. i haven't tested this yet, but it looks very
> straightforward... review appreciated in any event.
> i'm rolling this along with the patch for the CVE-2008-5234 into an
> upcoming nmu.

Not needed.

We already have a patch which, along with some others, is waiting for review
before I commit them, release 1.1.16 then backport the patches for lenny.

[m-f-t set]

--
| Darren Salt | linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
| + Generate power using sun, wind, water, nuclear. FORGET COAL AND OIL.

The tigers of wrath are wiser than the horses of instruction.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
no comments
  Processed: Re: Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free         


Author: Debian Bug Tracking System
Date: Dec 26, 2008 13:10

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 509287 serious
Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> tags 509287 + lenny-ignore
Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny-ignore
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
no comments
  Processed: patch         


Author: Debian Bug Tracking System
Date: Dec 26, 2008 11:40

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 507165 patch
Bug#507165: xine-lib: CVE-2008-5242 heap-based buffer overflow
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
no comments
  Bug#507184: marked as done (xine-lib: CVE-2008-5246 heap overflow)         


Author: Debian Bug Tracking System
Date: Dec 26, 2008 11:10

> From: Debian Bug Tracking System owner@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: already fixed in testing/unstable
> Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:47:12 +0100
>
> Version: 1.1.14-3
>
> hi,
>
> this bug was fixed in the august upload of the package:
>
> xine-lib (1.1.14-3) unstable; urgency=high
>
> * More security fixes from upstream hg:
> ==> - Fix an exploitable ID3 heap buffer overflow.
> - Check for possible buffer overflow attempts in the Real demuxer.
> - Use size_t for data length variables where there may be int overflows.
> - Add some checks for memory allocation failures.
>
> i've verified that the patch is applied.
> ...
Show full article (3.66Kb)
no comments
  Bug#509821: impressive: Crash with OpenGL error.         


Author: David Herbert
Date: Dec 26, 2008 11:10

Package: impressive
Version: 0.10.2r-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Impressive fails to start and give the following backtrace:

Welcome to Impressive version 0.10.2
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/impressive", line 161, in
from OpenGL.GL import *
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/OpenGL/GL/__init__...
Show full article (3.39Kb)
no comments
  Bug#509793: [ure] FHS violation -- incorrect file installation         


Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Dec 26, 2008 10:50

tag 509793 + pending
thanks

David Paleino wrote:
> the experimental version of ure incorrectly installs a tree under /debian/.

Yeah, noticed that too when lintian told me (I forgot a ure.links in the tree
from when I started working on migrating openoffice.org to *.install/*.links
instead of doing it manually) but I kept it in because I needed to fix
broken packages and ddn't want to build one more day - especially as I have
only slow DSL at my parents' place over christmas :-)
> This is a violation of the FHS (Filesystem Hierarchy Standard) -- thus the
> serious severity -- and it might as well affect the functionality of depending
> packages (haven't tested this).

How should *extra*, *bogus* files affect the functionality of this?
(which is in the "normal" /usr/lib/ure dirs)

Anyway, pending. Will automatically fix itself in the next upload.

Regards,

Rene
Show full article (1.03Kb)
1 Comment
  Processed: Re: Bug#509793: [ure] FHS violation -- incorrect file installation         


Author: Debian Bug Tracking System
Date: Dec 26, 2008 10:50

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 509793 + pending
Bug#509793: [ure] FHS violation -- incorrect file installation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
no comments
  Bug#504282: program aborts due to assertion         


Author: Maximilian Schwerin
Date: Dec 26, 2008 10:40

Hi,

you might want to try the attached patch, as the current SVN version in trunk is
rather unstable!

It would also be nice if you'd report errors to the bug tracker at

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=72768&atid=535638

as I have problems fixing bugs I don't know anything about.

Cheers, Maximilian

Index: src/odk_osd.c
===================================================================
--- src/odk_osd.c (Revision 3677)
+++ src/odk_osd.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -57,40 +57,22 @@
#include "odk_private.h"
#include "utils.h"

-
-#ifdef DEBUG
-#define VALIDATE_POINT(x,y) { \
- if ((x < 0) \
- || (x >= odk->osd.width)) { \
- fatal ("x-value is outside " \
- ...
Show full article (7.31Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9