Author: Wayne TuckerWayne Tucker Date: Oct 2, 2007 17:50
Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hi Wayne,
Hello Nathan,
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 10:38 -0700, Wayne Tucker wrote:
>>
>> fsck.xfs doesn't check to see if the device it is asked to check
>> exists. This can result in a system booting with an incomplete set of
>> filesystem mounts. The included patch works for me, although I only
>> have a limited number of systems on which to test it.
>
> Hmm, OK - seems safe enough I guess. It'd be nice to understand
> the root cause here a bit - is the problem that we dont attempt to
> access /dev/foo at all, so udev doesn't see any requests for that
> device and doesnt create the device node? Then later when we try
> to mount, the mount userspace code gets ENODEV? If so, I wonder
> why the mount doesn't populate the device nodes on its access?
My knowledge of udev is pretty limited, so I'm not sure if that would
come into play at all.
|