linux.debian.bugs.dist
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
linux.debian.bugs.dist only
 
Advanced search
July 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
 123456 27
78910111213 28
14151617181920 29
21222324252627 30
28293031    31
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
linux.debian.bugs.dist Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

 Up
  Bug#493186: Upgrade to 0.2.4 ?         


Author: Arnaud Ebalard
Date: Jul 31, 2008 23:40

Package: libp11-0
Version: 0.2.3-2
Severity: wishlist

As a result of a vulnerability discovered against OpenSC [1], new
releases of the various elements of the project have been published.
Among those is a new version of libp11: 0.2.4. Would it be possible to
release a new version of the package (there is a functionality I am
interested in in the new version).

Thanks for your work,

Cheers,

a+

[1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.opensc.devel/7365

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
2 Comments
  Bug#493185: v86d doesn't work from initramfs         


Author: Yves-Alexis Perez
Date: Jul 31, 2008 23:40

Package: v86d
Version: 0.1.5.2-1
Severity: normal

Hey,

I tried to use the new v86d from the initramfs so I could have a framebuffer
in early stages, but it doesn't work.

Logs say:

Aug 1 08:11:06 hidalgo kernel: agpgart: Detected an Intel 965GM Chipset.
Aug 1 08:11:06 hidalgo kernel: agpgart: Detected 7676K stolen memory.
Aug 1 08:11:06 hidalgo kernel: agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xe0000000
Aug 1 08:11:06 hidalgo kernel: uvesafb: Getting VBE info block failed (eax=0x4f00, err=-3)
Aug 1 08:11:06 hidalgo kernel: uvesafb: vbe_init() failed with -22
Aug 1 08:11:06 hidalgo kernel: uvesafb: probe of uvesafb.0 failed with error -22

As you may know I run a Thinkpad T61 full intel and can provide other stuff. I didn't specify a mode in the /etc/initramfs-tools/modules line because anyway bios doesn't send 1400x1050 as a valid resolution for my screen.

If you need more info, please ask :)

Cheers,

--
Yves-Alexis
Show full article (1.77Kb)
2 Comments
  Bug#358195: dput: Please add an option to limit used bandwith         


Author: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
Date: Jul 31, 2008 23:20

Dear Giridhar,

Could you please consider my patch for limit the used bandwidth for scp
part?

The scp command provides "-l" option which can be used to limit the
bandwidth. The unit is Kbits/sec, not Kbytes/sec.

I'm making a patch for this. Could you please check if it is possible to
included it into the dput package?

Many Thanks,
Paul

--
PaulLiu(劉穎駿)
E-mail address: grandpaul@gmail.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
Show full article (1.36Kb)
1 Comment
  Bug#390433: dash: does not execute EXIT trap if shell is killed         


Author: Chris Lamb
Date: Jul 31, 2008 23:10

Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 390433 + patch
> thanks

Hi Gerrit,

You marked this bug as "forwarded" but I don't see anything on the mailing
list about it; should I just look harder?

Regards,

--
Chris Lamb, UK chris@chris-lamb.co.uk
GPG: 0x634F9A20

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiSpmIACgkQ5/8uW2NPmiBXfQCeMwGF4K8v7DHbK2ZyiX1z2/NK
qBgAn1XthW31vZmtQ+Ljm+8afS2HtMVf
=tMEn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
no comments
  Bug#493184: aufs: Deadlocks in the rename() call.         


Author: Cyril Brulebois
Date: Jul 31, 2008 23:00

Package: aufs
Version: 0+20080719-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

Hi jak,

as you probably already know, there is a quite inconvenient bug in
sid+lenny's aufs, which is blocking renames, caused by deadlocks. That
means that one can't update the apt cache through apt-get/aptitude, at
the very least (it's not like rename() is something very rare anyway),
which IMHO makes it unfit for a stable release.

For more details, initial upstream bugreport:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems.aufs.user/1270

The patch as provided by upstream:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems.aufs.user/1291
Show full article (4.19Kb)
no comments
  Bug#293296: lintian: detect outdated libtool for GNU/kFreeBSD         


Author: Petr Salinger
Date: Jul 31, 2008 22:50

Hi,

it seems my wishlist is already submitted ;-)

For GNU/kFreeBSD, the milestone (upstream) libtool version are

1.5.2-1 - earlier does not support GNU/kFreeBSD at all

1.5.24-1 - fixed anon_versioning bug for GNU/kFreeBSD and hurd (rarely hitted)

Present file "ltconfig" signals really ancient libtool (1.3 series),
for 1.5 series version can be obtained from "ltmain.sh" file
by "grep ^VERSION ltmain.sh"

Please, could you consider adding this check,
it would safe us some porting time.

Petr

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
2 Comments
  Intent to NMU zekr-quran-translations-en to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs         


Author: Christian Perrier
Date: Jul 31, 2008 22:30

Dear Debian maintainer,

The zekr-quran-translations-en Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf, namely bug number 475461 (and maybe other similar bugs).

We're now getting very close to the release and fixing l10n bugs should be done now. Letting such bugs sleep in the BTS is simply lowering
the chances that your package interaction with its users may be done
in something else than the English language. It is also not
encouraging for translators.

I have the intention, as part of a more general action of the Debian
i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload
for zekr-quran-translations-en in order to fix this as well as all pending translations
for the debconf templates.

Of course, an upload made by you would even be better...:-)

Such changes are always harmless, which explains why I safely consider
building NMU's for such issues even though they're obviously non critical.

The schedule for the NMU (in case it happens, that is if you agree with it
or if I don't receive any answer in 14 days) is roughly the following:
Show full article (2.68Kb)
no comments
  Intent to NMU pure-ftpd to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs         


Author: Christian Perrier
Date: Jul 31, 2008 22:30

Dear Debian maintainer,

The pure-ftpd Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf, namely bug number 481673 (and maybe other similar bugs).

We're now getting very close to the release and fixing l10n bugs should be done now. Letting such bugs sleep in the BTS is simply lowering
the chances that your package interaction with its users may be done
in something else than the English language. It is also not
encouraging for translators.

I have the intention, as part of a more general action of the Debian
i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload
for pure-ftpd in order to fix this as well as all pending translations
for the debconf templates.

Of course, an upload made by you would even be better...:-)

Such changes are always harmless, which explains why I safely consider
building NMU's for such issues even though they're obviously non critical.

The schedule for the NMU (in case it happens, that is if you agree with it
or if I don't receive any answer in 14 days) is roughly the following:
Show full article (2.63Kb)
no comments
  Bug#493096: xserver-xorg-video-intel: [855GM] External monitor unusable         


Author: Andrew Moise
Date: Jul 31, 2008 22:00

FWIW, I also had this problem with 2.3.2-2+lenny1 (and not with
2.3.2-2), and the version from
http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/493096/ did fix it for me. I also
got a backtrace of where X was hanging when it was too busy to bring
my windows up:

0xb7b13cfa in i830_crt_detect (output=0x8aaac00) at ../../src/i830_crt.c:285
285 ../../src/i830_crt.c: No such file or directory.
in ../../src/i830_crt.c
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7b13cfa in i830_crt_detect...
Show full article (1.44Kb)
no comments
  Bug#491820: Patch         


Author: Matt Kraai
Date: Jul 31, 2008 21:20

tag 491820 patch
thanks

This problem is caused by a number of unexpected macro expansions:

mailto:mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz[]

is expanded using the mailto macro to

<mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

This is expanded using the
(?su)(?:\w])[\\]?(?P\w[\w._-]*@[\w._-]*\w)(?!["<\w.])
pattern and the mailto macro to

<<mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>>

This is then expanded using the
(?su)[\\]?<<(?P[\w"].*?)>> pattern and the xref2
macro to



It would be best to fix this in AsciiDoc. By changing the former
pattern to
n
(?su)(?:;\w])[\\]?(?P\w[\w._-]*@[\w._-]*\w)(?!["<&\w.])

so it wouldn't re-expand email addresses next to an entity.
Show full article (1.40Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9