|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
|
Author: Jon G.Jon G. Date: Sep 5, 2008 10:35
|
| |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
  |
Author: junoexpressjunoexpress Date: Sep 5, 2008 12:01
On Sep 5, 1:35Â pm, "Jon G." peoplepc.com> wrote:
Pick up a book (see Spilker, Tsui, or Enge & Misra) and do some
reading instead of relying on others or the Internet solely for your
info. As you are hopefully learning, this is not a very reliable
strategy.
But if you find this all too taxing for your mind, then at last read
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudorange
(*read*, don't *skim*, got it)
Cheers Quaker,
M
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Jon G.Jon G. Date: Sep 5, 2008 18:07
I saw it on the History Channel... three giagantic spheres looming over the
planet Earth, and the narrator said, "GPS is based on the intersection of
three spheres from three satellite transmissions, at two points."
All I did was calculate those two points. ALRIGHT? Include yourself among
the others in "instead on relying on others."
I made a life out of Bouguer anomalies and corrections. WHO NEEDS THEM?
--
Jon G.
jon8338@ peoplepc.com
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/jon8338/math/index.html
|
| Show full article (1.37Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: junoexpressjunoexpress Date: Sep 5, 2008 23:48
On Sep 5, 9:07Â pm, "Jon G." peoplepc.com> wrote:
> I saw it on the History Channel... three giagantic spheres looming over the
> planet Earth, and the narrator said, "GPS is based on the intersection of
> three spheres from three satellite transmissions, at two points."
>
Wow! The History Channel! What a solid scientific source. Dude, I am
like so impressed. Forgive me for ever doubting you for even a time-
stamped nano-second.
BTW, did you ever figure out what the pseudorange was?
M
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: christian.bauchristian.bau Date: Sep 6, 2008 11:11
On Sep 6, 2:07Â am, "Jon G." peoplepc.com> wrote:
> I saw it on the History Channel... three giagantic spheres looming over the
> planet Earth, and the narrator said, "GPS is based on the intersection of
> three spheres from three satellite transmissions, at two points."
History Channel probably has to simplify things a little bit for its
audience.
Each satellite transmits a time stamp. And it transmits enough
information so that your GPS receiver can figure out exactly where the
satellite was when it sent that time stamp. If your GPS receiver also
knew exactly what time it was when that information was received, then
it would know how long ago that signal was sent, and if it was sent
lets say x seconds ago, then the GPS receiver would know that it is on
a sphere around the satellite with a radius xc (where c = speed of
light).
|
| Show full article (1.46Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Tim SmithTim Smith Date: Sep 6, 2008 13:17
> Each satellite transmits a time stamp. And it transmits enough
> information so that your GPS receiver can figure out exactly where the
> satellite was when it sent that time stamp. If your GPS receiver also
> knew exactly what time it was when that information was received, then
> it would know how long ago that signal was sent, and if it was sent
> lets say x seconds ago, then the GPS receiver would know that it is on
> a sphere around the satellite with a radius xc (where c = speed of
> light).
>
> Unfortunately, the GPS doesn't know the exact time. That makes things
> more difficult. With three satellites, the GPS would know that those
> satellites sent their time stamps x1 + d, x2 + d, x3 + d seconds ago,
> but d is unknown. The radius of the free spheres isn't x1*c, x2*c,
> x3*c but x1*c + cd, x2*c + cd and x3*c + cd, where d is unknown. The
> GPS receiver could make a guess that it is on the surface of the
> earth, and calculate its position from that additional information
> (probably good enough for a car, but not for an airplane), but for the ...
|
| Show full article (2.36Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|