Riporto da it.fan.scrittori.tolkien un interessante articolo:
http://tls.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,25339-2647841,00.html

In data venerdì 27 luglio 2007, Micetto Nero, nel post
<news:1185535647.5905.1.camel@ubuntu> in it-alt.fan.harry-potter, ha
scritto (possibili CUT sparsi):

veramente, non l'hai riportato ;P

Il giorno ven, 27/07/2007 alle 14.29 +0200, Cammagno ha scritto:

Scusa, non c'è il link?

In data venerdì 27 luglio 2007, Micetto Nero, nel post
<news:1185558456.6095.0.camel@ubuntu> in it-alt.fan.harry-potter, ha
scritto (possibili CUT sparsi):

riportare e linkare sono due cose ben diverse.

Cmq scherzavo, eh :)

Cammagno ha scritto:

Harry Potter and the shadow of Karamazov
Roz Kaveney

The last book in a series is always a summation as well as a conclusion.
It has to make sense of what has gone before and where possible repair
the damage done by miscalculation in the earlier work. If there was an
over-arching plan at the start, it will have been modified along the
way, if not in the details of the plot, then in the emotional feel and
moral content of the arc. If Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is,
for all its weaknesses, a far more satisfying work than some of its
predecessors, it is because J. K. Rowling is an intelligent writer for
whom writing the most popular children’s books in history has been an
education in responsibility and power not unlike that of her boy wizard
hero.

In plot terms, this is a nightmare of persecution and random malice that
resolves into a cathartic battle. Voldemort’s forces take over the
Ministry of Magic and Hogwarts; they persecute mixed-blood...