tjab > Can you find one that decribes his actions but not yours?
tjab > I thought not.

TNKev >   "http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
TNKev >   Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
TNKev >   following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).

Nah, They'd rather post a definition of stalker that I
argued AGAINST once, and claim over and over again
that it's MY definition. They seek to reduce all
argument to he said, she said.

It's like pretending Wills and Moore aren't
identified by Middle names or birthdays.

Caught dead to rights in a lie, they just LIE some more.

http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp...+#_1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005

On Apr 18, 5:39 pm, Greegor gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:39:46 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
gmail.com> wrote:

The following appears NOWHERE in tjab's post. Greg has inserted
it as a means of deception (read: LYING):

Care to explain to the readers exactly why you dishonestly and
deceptively inserted a quote tjab did NOT include into your reply to
his post?

It is.

tjab > Can you find one that decribes his actions but not yours?
tjab > I thought not.

KW > The following appears NOWHERE in tjab's post.  Greg
KW > has inserted it as a means of deception (read: LYING):

TNKev > "http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
TNKev > Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
TNKev > following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).

Kent, I did not attribute it to tjab.

KW > Care to explain to the readers exactly why
KW > you dishonestly and deceptively inserted
KW > a quote tjab did NOT include into your
KW > reply to his post?

What's the deception?
It's attributed to Meloy, really.

G > Nah, They'd rather post a definition of stalker that I
G > argued AGAINST once, and claim over and over again
G > that it's MY definition.

KW > It is.

On Apr 19, 3:38 pm, Greegor gmail.com> wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Dan, What is YOUR position on Kent Wills conviction?
Are you in denial about it?