Re: Cheney on 4,000 American Dead - "They volunteered"
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
houston.politics only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

houston.politics Profile…
 Up
Re: Cheney on 4,000 American Dead - "They volunteered"         


Author: fargo116
Date: Mar 25, 2008 09:24

On Mar 25, 11:13 am, Ob...@real.com wrote:
> Cheney on 4000 American Dead: "They Volunteered."http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/03/24/cheney-on-4000-american-dead...
>
> Posted: 24 Mar 2008 08:50 PM CDT
>
> How's that for "supporting the troops"?

None of them volunteered to have their lives wasted.

Darth Shooter: So?

S. Olson
2 Comments
Re: Cheney on 4,000 American Dead - "They volunteered"         


Author: LoveSlinger
Date: Mar 25, 2008 09:30

"So?" Cheney Compares Iraq & Afghan War Decisions With Ford's Pardon
Of Nixon! You Be A Judge ...

Cheney'd have us believe your White House war criminals' "decision" to
invade a sovereign nation to slaughter thousands of human beings will
be vindicated, just as, he claims, Gerald Ford's pardon of Nixon,
unpopular at the time, now is seen as the correct decision.

Of course Dick's comparing a no-death political decision with an
illegal, immoral, and unending war crime that has no possibility of
"victory" and that's so far claimed 35,000 U.S. casualties and upward
of a MILLION Iraqi lives. And Afghanistan? Forget it! Your
"administration" and NATO have.

-------------------
"Cheney on the Iraq War -- and Nixon's Pardon"
The Washington Post
Tuesday, March 25, 2008; A10
Show full article (3.07Kb)
no comments
Re: Cheney on 4,000 American Dead - "They volunteered"         


Author: Obwon
Date: Mar 26, 2008 08:15

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:24:51 -0700 (PDT), fargo116
yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Mar 25, 11:13 am, Ob...@real.com wrote:
>> Cheney on 4000 American Dead: "They Volunteered."http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/03/24/cheney-on-4000-american-dead...
>>
>> Posted: 24 Mar 2008 08:50 PM CDT
>>
>> How's that for "supporting the troops"?
>
>None of them volunteered to have their lives wasted.
>
>Darth Shooter: So?
>
>S. Olson
Show full article (1.36Kb)
no comments