gnu.hurd.bug
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
gnu.hurd.bug only
 
Advanced search
September 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
1234567 36
891011121314 37
15161718192021 38
22232425262728 39
2930      40
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
gnu.hurd.bug Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Re: A New Design of nsmux (discussed on IRC on 2008/09/07)         


Author: olafBuddenhagen
Date: Sep 20, 2008 04:04

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:34:22PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:37 PM, gmx.net> wrote:
>> A lot of these design considerations hinge on the question how to
>> handle recursion, i.e. what behaviour is desired if we have a
>> dynamic translator, and do further magic lookups.
>>
>> When...
Show full article (10.68Kb)
no comments
  Re: GSoC results!         


Author: olafBuddenhagen
Date: Sep 20, 2008 01:18

Hi Arne,

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:17:26AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 10 September 2008 06:52:13 schrieb
> olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net:
> (Do you prefer Olaf or antrik?

I'm fine either way :-)

Initially it seemed a bit odd to me, that although I always call myself
"antrik" in all my Hurd-related an generally most of my online
activities, everyone addresses me by my christian name in email... But
by now I got used to it so much that it actually feels almost strange
when someone addresses me as "antrik" in email...
> - did I already ask that?)

Don't think so :-)
Show full article (2.14Kb)
no comments
  Re: [META] Replying to messages, again         


Author: Michael Banck
Date: Sep 19, 2008 02:23

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:34:38PM +0200, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> Sorry, but no. The list-reply feature of Mutt is there to be used, and
> I'm going to use it.

Personally, I try to hit 'g' if the person I reply to is unknown to me
and it a new message (not in the middle of a thread), otherwise
list-reply. I forgot this time as well.

Michael
no comments
  Re: GSoC results!         


Author: Arne Babenhauserheide
Date: Sep 18, 2008 23:17

Hi Olaf,

(Do you prefer Olaf or antrik? - did I already ask that?)

Firstoff: The status is great work!

(I didn't yet comment on it here, but I already worked a bit on the wiki
page).

I have three comments:

Am Mittwoch 10 September 2008 06:52:13 schrieb olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net:
> All in all we had five students working on a diverse selection of five
> projects from our ideas list. All of the projects were more or less
> successful:

Wouldn't "The students and mentors did a great job!" be more useful when seen
from the "hey, I just entered this site, let's look what the Hurd is doing
with GSoC" viewpoint?

Also I want to ask: Would it be correct to say "Four of the students still
work on further improving the Hurd".

Differently put:
@Zheng Da, Flavio Cruz, Andrei Barbu and Madhusudan.C.S:

"Are you still working on the Hurd?"

(@Sergio: I know that you still do (from this list) so I didn't ask you :) )
Show full article (2.46Kb)
no comments
  Re: A New Design of nsmux (discussed on IRC on 2008/09/07)         


Author: Sergiu Ivanov
Date: Sep 18, 2008 12:34

Hello,

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:37 PM, gmx.net> wrote:
> A lot of these design considerations hinge on the question how to handle
> recursion, i.e. what behaviour is desired if we have a dynamic
> translator, and do further magic lookups.
>
> When doing magic...
Show full article (21.70Kb)
no comments
  Re: Current state of Xorg on Hurd?         


Author: Michael Banck
Date: Sep 18, 2008 01:44

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:10:35AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag 16 September 2008 17:07:15 schrieb Thomas Schwinge:
>> date: 2003-11-09 20:13:47 +0100; author: tomhart; state: Exp; lines:
>
> OK, then it's clear why it doesn't work :)
>
> 5 years is a hell of a lot of time...
>
> I'll see if I can get it running.

I'm not sure why you think the GNU Hurd user guide would tell you how to
run X.org.

The (mostly) uptodate information is on the wiki.

Michael
no comments
  Re: Current state of Xorg on Hurd?         


Author: Arne Babenhauserheide
Date: Sep 17, 2008 23:10

Am Dienstag 16 September 2008 17:07:15 schrieb Thomas Schwinge:
> date: 2003-11-09 20:13:47 +0100; author: tomhart; state: Exp; lines:

OK, then it's clear why it doesn't work :)

5 years is a hell of a lot of time...

I'll see if I can get it running.

Thanks!
Arne
--
-- My stuff: http://draketo.de - stories, songs, poems, programs and stuff :)
-- Infinite Hands: http://infinite-hands.draketo.de - singing a part of the
history of free software.
-- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere (Rollenspiel-) Regeln.

-- PGP/GnuPG: http://draketo.de/inhalt/ich/pubkey.txt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkjR8NwACgkQMwdGm/6WxASfRgCeMLhhipXfgXiZrtZha/OkZAJF
h+EAoNUnH53smq0ao9s/e9CvfA4vyYbG
=5z/P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
no comments
  Re: [META] Replying to messages, again         


Author: olafBuddenhagen
Date: Sep 17, 2008 03:34

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:58:09PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> The person you've been meaning to send this message to isn't a
> subscriber of the bug-hurd mailing list (IIRC), so he didn't receive
> your reply.

Thanks for pointing it out. I now bounced the reply to him.

Have you informed him that he didn't receive any of the replies?...
> Hurd and also most of the other GNU mailing lists do accept posts from
> addresses which are not subscribers of the respective mailing lists,
> so please, everyone, simply get used to use the `g' key in Mutt (as an
> example) or your mailer's ``reply to all'' functionality when replying
> to posts.

Sorry, but no. The list-reply feature of Mutt is there to be used, and
I'm going to use it.

I guess we can't expecty everyone sending a message to a list he is not
subscribed to, to know about the mail-followup-to: header, and set it
accordingly, so a good mail client will DTRT automatically. But we
certainly can expect people to mention somewhere in the mail that they
are not subscribed, so others know they need to Cc: them.
Show full article (1.10Kb)
no comments
  [bug #24278] bad number magic 0 (should be 0xef53)         


Author: Michael Banck
Date: Sep 16, 2008 09:17

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #24278 (project hurd):
> start (hd0,0)/hurd/ext2fs.static: ext2fs: device:hd0s0

hd0s0 is not a valid device name. Fix your grub config.

Michael

_______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?24278>

_______________________________________________
Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
no comments
  [bug #24278] bad number magic 0 (should be 0xef53)         


Author: Alessandro Sangiuliano
Date: Sep 16, 2008 09:11

Show full article (1.42Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9