tramp, emacs, xp, putty
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
gnu.emacs.help only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

gnu.emacs.help Profile…
 Up
Re: tramp, emacs, xp, putty         


Author: Eli Zaretskii
Date: Jan 5, 2007 11:04

> From: "MitchellCowen" gmail.com>
> Date: 5 Jan 2007 08:50:03 -0800
>
> I've been browsing through the list archives but I still don't
> understand how to install tramp to work with normal emacs [not xemacs
> or emacsW32] on XP. Someone says that emacs22 already has tramp but I
> don't see the binary at http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/ .

Emacs 22 was not yet released, but you can find the binary on the same
site as emacsW32: there's an unpatched binary there.
Show full article (1.21Kb)
no comments
Re: tramp, emacs, xp, putty         


Author: Michael Albinus
Date: Jan 7, 2007 05:30

"MitchellCowen" gmail.com> writes:
> Hi all.

Hi,
> This is what I've tried so far:
> 1. Downloaded cygwin
> 2. Downloaded tramp
> 3. Unpacked tramp to C:\Program Files\emacs\emacs-21.3\tramp-2.1.7
> 4. change directory to the tramp-2.1.7 directory
> 5. ./configure --with-contrib --with-lispdir='C:/Program
> Files/Emacs/site-lisp' --infodir='C:/Program Files/Emacs/info'
>
> I get the response
> : command not found4:
> ./configure: line 24: syntax error near unexpected token 'newline'
> ./configure: line 24 'case set -o 2> /dev/null' in *posix *>set -o
> posix;;' sac
>
> I am assuming this is some problem with cygwin. Any ideas how to do
> this correctly?
Show full article (2.30Kb)
no comments
Re: tramp, emacs, xp, putty         


Author: Michael Albinus
Date: Jan 7, 2007 05:56

Eli Zaretskii gnu.org> writes:
> I suggest to get a native Windows binary of Emacs 22, it all works
> there out of the box, no customizations in .emacs are necessary.

Emacs 22 carries Tramp 2.0. The OP wants to install Tramp 2.1, which
is different.

Best regards, Michael.
no comments
Re: tramp, emacs, xp, putty         


Author: Michael Albinus
Date: Jan 7, 2007 13:09

Eli Zaretskii gnu.org> writes:
>> Emacs 22 carries Tramp 2.0. The OP wants to install Tramp 2.1, which
>> is different.
>
> I rather gathered that the OP wants a _working_ Tramp, in which case
> trying to use the latest and greatest instead of a version that works
> out of the box is something I wouldn't recommend.

Eli, I don't want to mess with you :-)

Tramp 2.1 is an experimental release, that's true. But the OP was
explicitely speaking about Tramp 2.1.7, and I'm happy about every
tester. This will change its experimental status faster into a
reliable one.

Best regards, Michael.
no comments
tramp, emacs, xp, putty         


Author: MitchellCowen
Date: Jan 5, 2007 08:50

Hi all.

I've been browsing through the list archives but I still don't
understand how to install tramp to work with normal emacs [not xemacs
or emacsW32] on XP. Someone says that emacs22 already has tramp but I
don't see the binary at http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/ .

This is what I've tried so far:
1. Downloaded cygwin
2. Downloaded tramp
3. Unpacked tramp to C:\Program Files\emacs\emacs-21.3\tramp-2.1.7
4. change directory to the tramp-2.1.7 directory
5. ./configure --with-contrib --with-lispdir='C:/Program
Files/Emacs/site-lisp' --infodir='C:/Program Files/Emacs/info'

I get the response
: command not found4:
./configure: line 24: syntax error near unexpected token 'newline'
./configure: line 24 'case set -o 2> /dev/null' in *posix *>set -o
posix;;' sac

I am assuming this is some problem with cygwin. Any ideas how to do
this correctly?
Show full article (1.92Kb)
5 Comments
Re: tramp, emacs, xp, putty         


Author: Eli Zaretskii
Date: Jan 7, 2007 12:42

> From: Michael Albinus
> Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:56:16 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii gnu.org> writes:
>
>> I suggest to get a native Windows binary of Emacs 22, it all works
>> there out of the box, no customizations in .emacs are necessary.
>
> Emacs 22 carries Tramp 2.0. The OP wants to install Tramp 2.1, which
> is different.

I rather gathered that the OP wants a _working_ Tramp, in which case
trying to use the latest and greatest instead of a version that works
out of the box is something I wouldn't recommend.
no comments