My dream work log:
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
gnu.emacs.help only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

gnu.emacs.help Profile…
 Up
My dream work log:         


Author: Albert
Date: Mar 28, 2008 00:30

My dream work log:

One fine morning I do this:

1. I open a "file.txt" in emacs
2. I modify it, say in line 4, I change "this-thing" to "that-thing"
3. save the file
4. again, going back to the same line 4, i change "that-thing" to
"something"
5. save the file
6. exit
Show full article (0.74Kb)
29 Comments
Re: My dream work log:         


Author: B. T. Raven
Date: Mar 28, 2008 09:50

Albert wrote:
> My dream work log:
>
> One fine morning I do this:
>
> 1. I open a "file.txt" in emacs
> 2. I modify it, say in line 4, I change "this-thing" to "that-thing"
> 3. save the file
> 4. again, going back to the same line 4, i change "that-thing" to
> "something"
> 5. save the file
> 6. exit
>
> I want my Worklog to append the log to something like this:
>
>
Show full article (0.85Kb)
no comments
Re: My dream work log:         


Author: Thierry Volpiatto
Date: Mar 28, 2008 09:53

Albert gmail.com> writes:
> My dream work log:
>
> One fine morning I do this:
>
> 1. I open a "file.txt" in emacs
> 2. I modify it, say in line 4, I change "this-thing" to "that-thing"
> 3. save the file
> 4. again, going back...
Show full article (0.93Kb)
no comments
Re: My dream work log:         


Author: Albert
Date: Mar 29, 2008 01:36

Thank you Raven and Thierry.
I didn't know about this version control.

Thank you very much.
no comments
Re: My dream work log:         


Author: Mike Treseler
Date: Mar 29, 2008 10:18

B. T. Raven wrote:
> Check out Menu>Tools>Version Control

See also:
Menu>Tools>Compare

-- Mike Treseler
no comments
Choosing a versioning system (was My dream work log:)         


Author: rustom
Date: Mar 30, 2008 10:21

On Mar 29, 10:18 pm, Mike Treseler comcast.net> wrote:
> B. T. Raven wrote:
>> Check out Menu>Tools>Version Control
>
> See also:
>
>>Tools>Compare
>
>      -- Mike Treseler

Out of curiosity I did this and found that the default version control
system that gets invoked is rcs.
I wonder if this (default) is the best advice to a noob??
My impression is that rcs was superseded by cvs by svn by.. well... a
lot of competition!
This is a genuine question
--- I'm familiar with many versioning
systems but not too good at any of them.

So what do most emacs-ers use?
no comments
Re: Choosing a versioning system (was My dream work log:)         


Author: Mike Treseler
Date: Mar 30, 2008 11:32

rustom wrote:
> Out of curiosity I did this and found that the default version control
> system that gets invoked is rcs.
> I wonder if this (default) is the best advice to a noob??

I use rcs for my own casual use and svn for group projects.
rcs requires no setup and is well integrated into emacs.
For svn, I am using kdesvn, which worked so well out of the box
that I have not yet explored the various emacs interfaces.

-- Mike Treseler
no comments
Re: Choosing a versioning system         


Author: Thierry Volpiatto
Date: Mar 30, 2008 10:50

rustom gmail.com> writes:
Show full article (1.16Kb)
no comments
Re: Choosing a versioning system (was My dream work log:)         


Author: Oleg Katsitadze
Date: Mar 30, 2008 11:59

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:21:34AM -0700, rustom wrote:
> system that gets invoked is rcs.
> I wonder if this (default) is the best advice to a noob??

This is a good choice if all you want to control is a single file (or
a collection of unrelated files). Great for keeping track of changes
to configuration files.
> My impression is that rcs was superseded by cvs by svn by.. well... a
> lot of competition!

These make sense when you have a "project" -- a collection of related
files under directory hierarchy.
> This is a genuine question --- I'm familiar with many versioning
> systems but not too good at any of them.

This is my understanding:

CVS is good but has a few flaws. Don't use it for new projects.

SVN (subversion) is a successor to CVS with the flaws fixed and new
features added. I've started using it recently and it seems to be
just great.
Show full article (1.13Kb)
no comments
Re: Choosing a versioning system (was My dream work log:)         


Author: rustom
Date: Mar 30, 2008 20:55

On Mar 30, 11:59 pm, Oleg Katsitadze gmail.com> wrote:
> CVS is good but has a few flaws.  Don't use it for new projects.
>
> SVN (subversion) is a successor to CVS with the flaws fixed and new
> features added.
>
> Distributed systems (git, monotone) are good when you don't have (or
> don't want to have) a server to keep the repository.

Yes that is my impression also.
What your reply suggests however is that we are seeing a cycle of
simple-complex-simple:
rcs -- simple (no server)
cvs,svn -- more complex because needs centralized server
modern distributed ones -- once again no need for server but with the
lock model replaced with the merge model (see
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.2/svn.basic.vsn-models.html )

And so I was wondering if these systems give the best of all worlds?
Show full article (1.51Kb)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Postfix has stopped logging in var/log/maillist.postfix.users ·
1 2 3