> Just as there are mod-perl mod-python etc for apache is there
> something like mod-emacs of some sort?

> Just as there are mod-perl mod-python etc for apache is there
> something like mod-emacs of some sort?
>
> Context is as follows:
>
> org mode has org-export-as-html which produces html for the
> corresponding org file.
>
> If apache could be configured to talk to emacs then when it is asked
> to serve a .org file, say foo.org it could do
>
> emacs -batch -eval '(org-export-as-html foo.org)'
>
> and serve the resulting html.

> There is an emacs elisp httpd server (at least there use to be one), but no
> mod_emacs that I'm aware of.

> Of course, this is a rather resource expensive way of serving a few pages -
> you would always have to have an emacs image loaded or accept fairly slow
> responses (depending on machine/resoruces etc).
>
> I think a better solution would be to add a hook to the org mode save
> function that does an automatic export as html whenever the org file is
> updated. The pages can then be served by a regular httpd process and as a
> new export is done whenever the org file is saved, the pages will always be
> up-to-date (provided they are edited by emacs of course).

> Tim X writes:
>

>> There is an emacs elisp httpd server (at least there use to be one), but no
>> mod_emacs that I'm aware of.

>
> I wonder about the security of such a thing...

> Another approach that might be interesting is to create an emacs
> lisp package for common lisp. You could then take advantage of
> mod_lisp. Not sure how you would handle the lisp1 vs lisp2
> differences

> Hi Rustom,
>
> rustom gmail.com> writes:
>

>> Just as there are mod-perl mod-python etc for apache is there
>> something like mod-emacs of some sort?

> Some time ago, I set up a org->HTML online converter, but this was done
> through python: the script ran an "emacs -batch" instance and the HTML
> output was then opened.

> Good idea: this would be a great way to keep up my schedule without
> ferrying my org files from machine to machine. However...
>
> Did you get real checkboxes on org export to html? I've been
> considering trying to patch the code to do that. My currently loaded
> version of org-mode produces just "- [ ]" instead of an html checkbox.
> Is there any discussion of changing the behavior?

> jadamson@partners.org (Joel J. Adamson) writes:
>

>> Bastien altern.org> writes:
>>

>>> Hi Rustom,
>>>
>>> rustom gmail.com> writes:
>>>

>>>> Just as there are mod-perl mod-python etc...