 Up |
|
|
  |
Date: Oct 20, 2007 13:45
I have some code like this:
(if (test)
(exit)
(do something))
or
(if (test)
( do something)
(exit))
Various levels of nestings.
I have several questions, basic to sophisticated.
(1) What is the lisp equivalent idiom for (exit) as in bash or
in C.
(2) What is the best practice to handle this kind of problems?
(3) What is the intermediate practice to handle this kind of
problems.
|
| Show full article (1.11Kb) |
|
| | 33 Comments |
|
|
Date: Oct 20, 2007 13:57
On Oct 20, 1:45 pm, gnuist...@ gmail.com wrote: > I have some code like this:
>
> (if (test)
> (exit)
> (do something))
>
> or
>
> (if (test)
> ( do something)
> (exit))
>
> Various levels of nestings.
>
> I have several questions, basic to sophisticated.
>
> (1) What is the lisp equivalent idiom for (exit) as in bash or
> in C.
> (2) What is the best practice to handle this kind of problems? ...
|
| Show full article (1.33Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Alf P. SteinbachAlf P. Steinbach Date: Oct 20, 2007 15:55
> I have some code like this:
>
> (if (test)
> (exit)
> (do something))
>
>
> or
>
> (if (test)
> ( do something)
> (exit))
>
>
> Various levels of nestings.
>
> I have several questions, basic to sophisticated.
>
> (1) What is the lisp equivalent idiom for (exit) as in bash or ...
|
| Show full article (2.45Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Jim LangstonJim Langston Date: Oct 20, 2007 18:08
>I have some code like this:
>
> (if (test)
> (exit)
> (do something))
>
>
> or
>
> (if (test)
> ( do something)
> (exit))
>
>
> Various levels of nestings.
>
> I have several questions, basic to sophisticated.
> ...
|
| Show full article (3.55Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Keith ThompsonKeith Thompson Date: Oct 20, 2007 19:30
> I have some code like this:
>
> (if (test)
> (exit)
> (do something))
>
>
> or
>
> (if (test)
> ( do something)
> (exit))
That's Lisp, yes? Saying so would be good, since we naturally assume
that anything posted to comp.lang.c is C.
|
| Show full article (0.90Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Malcolm McLeanMalcolm McLean Date: Oct 21, 2007 01:03
>I have some code like this:
>
> (if (test)
> (exit)
> (do something))
>
>
> or
>
> (if (test)
> ( do something)
> (exit))
>
>
> Various levels of nestings.
>
> I have several questions, basic to sophisticated.
> ...
|
| Show full article (2.70Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Kenny McCormackKenny McCormack Date: Oct 21, 2007 03:44
In article nuthaus.mib.org>,
Keith Thompson mib.org> wrote:>> I have some code like this:
>>
>> (if (test)
>> (exit)
>> (do something))
>>
>>
>> or
>>
>> (if (test)
>> ( do something)
>> (exit))
>
>That's Lisp, yes? Saying so would be good, since we naturally assume
>that anything posted to comp.lang.c is C.
|
| Show full article (0.63Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Malcolm McLeanMalcolm McLean Date: Oct 21, 2007 05:09
"Kenny McCormack" xmission.xmission.com> wrote in message>
> Since all code used in the real world uses extensions, there is no C
> code in the real world.
>
Sort of true. You'll find a non-trivial program on my website to build fuzzy
logic trees. It is written in pure ANSI C89 except for one detail. The
comma-separated value file loader uses nan to indicate missing values.
Missing values are not allowed in the program, so it plays almost no part in
the main flow control. But it loads, checks for nans, and rejects if they
are present.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Richard HeathfieldRichard Heathfield Date: Oct 21, 2007 05:26
[Followup corrected to clc]
santosh said:
> Kenny McCormack wrote:
>
>> Since all code used in the real world uses extensions, there is no C
>> code in the real world.
>
> Perhaps you mean to say that there are no C _programs_ in the real
> world.
Even if that's what he meant, he's still wrong.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
