have installed cygwin, & "its" emacs. dired shows only subtree, no "up"
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
gnu.emacs.help only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

gnu.emacs.help Profile…
 Up
have installed cygwin, & "its" emacs. dired shows only subtree, no "up"         


Author: David Combs
Date: Sep 20, 2008 10:01

Installed cygwin on my wife's pc. Told it to grab, among
other things, emacs.

I run emacs, hit C-x d (dired), and shows me only
(I forget now) /home/.... With three files, (bash profile,
and two .xxxxrc files, and NO directories).

Seems that that's my "universe".

So as to go "up" in the dir-tree, I hit the "^", but
does nothing.

Question: How do I get access to the (entire) computer?

(Problem: I know **NOTHING** about M$ and xt (is what she has) --
the reason I want to use her pc is that I want to upload
.mp3 files to my Sansa "clip" mp3Player/radio/etc, and it
requires it be hooked (usb) to a pc windows. It will NOT
work on my sunblade100 (sparc), solaris9 -- I tried -- I can
charge the battery, yeah, but that's it, apparently.)

I was hoping I could, after downloading .mp3 files from the
net via firefox, then move them around, and stuff them into
my "clip" via dired.
Show full article (1.37Kb)
11 Comments
Re: have installed cygwin, & "its" emacs. dired shows only subtree, no "up"         


Author: Nikolaj Schumacher
Date: Sep 20, 2008 12:25

dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs) wrote:
> PS: glancing through the cygwin user-guide, I saw a bunch
> of stuff about having to use the mount command for something.
>
> (Yes, I'll end up studying it), but quickly, maybe,
> what's that all about? Is *that* how I'll get access
> to the *entire* of the C-disk, or something?)

IIRC, the C drive should already be mounted to /cygdrive/c/.

But I don't know why ^ wouldn't work...

regards,
Nikolaj Schumacher
no comments
Re: have installed cygwin, & "its" emacs. dired shows only subtree, no "up"         


Author: Martin Fischer
Date: Sep 20, 2008 13:15

(David Combs) writes:
> Installed cygwin on my wife's pc. Told it to grab, among
> other things, emacs.
>
> I run emacs, hit C-x d (dired), and shows me only
> (I forget now) /home/.... With three files, (bash profile,
> and two .xxxxrc files, and NO directories).
>
> Seems that that's my "universe".
>
> So as to go "up" in the dir-tree, I hit the "^", but
> does nothing.

Hi,

you may also try to feed the dired prompt with somthing like "c:/" or
"/cygdrive/c" or "/c".

Cheers

Martin
---
parozusa at web dot de
no comments
Re: have installed cygwin, & "its" emacs. dired shows only subtree, no "up"         


Author: David Combs
Date: Sep 20, 2008 18:26

In article <874p4aa81j.fsf@web.de>, Martin Fischer nospam.net> wrote:
>
>(David Combs) writes:
>
>> Installed cygwin on my wife's pc. Told it to grab, among
>> other things, emacs.
>>
>> I run emacs, hit C-x d (dired), and shows me only
>> (I forget now) /home/.... With three files, (bash profile,
>> and two .xxxxrc files, and NO directories).
>>
>> Seems that that's my "universe".
>>
>> So as to go "up" in the dir-tree, I hit the "^", but
>> does nothing.
>
>Hi,
>
>you may also try to feed the dired prompt with somthing like "c:/" or
>"/cygdrive/c" or "/c". ...
Show full article (1.75Kb)
no comments
Re: have installed cygwin, & "its" emacs. dired shows only subtree, no "up"         


Author: Lennart Borgman (gmail)
Date: Sep 20, 2008 18:45

> Any idea how to refer to the sandisk?

It gets a drive letter, at least on my pc.
no comments
Re: have installed cygwin, & "its" emacs. dired shows only subtree, no "up"         


Author: rustom
Date: Sep 20, 2008 20:30

On Sep 21, 6:45 am, "Lennart Borgman (gmail)"
gmail.com> wrote:
>> Any idea how to refer to the sandisk?
>
> It gets a drive letter, at least on my pc.

Native emacs (for windows) is better than cygwin emacs
no comments
Re: have installed cygwin, & "its" emacs. dired shows only subtree, no "up"         


Author: David Combs
Date: Sep 20, 2008 21:30

In article <9c7ab644-18fe-478f-9516-6b8f051aee7a@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
rustom gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sep 21, 6:45
no comments
Re: have installed cygwin, & "its" emacs. dired shows only subtree, no "up"         


Author: rustom
Date: Sep 20, 2008 22:06

On Sep 21, 9:30 am, dkco...@panix.com (David Combs) wrote:
> In article <9c7ab644-18fe-478f-9516-6b8f051ae...@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>
> rustom  gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Sep 21, 6:45 am, "Lennart Borgman (gmail)"
>>gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Any idea how to refer to the sandisk?
>
>>> It gets a drive letter, at least on my pc.
>
>>Native emacs (for windows) is better than cygwin emacs
>
> Well, OK.
>
> Please, though, (so I can convince her to download yet
> another humongous emacs ("ntemacs" is what you mean?)
> onto her computer), please give a few reasons for
> saying that.
>
> THANKS! ...
Show full article (1.55Kb)
no comments
Re: have installed cygwin, & "its" emacs. dired shows only subtree, no "up"         


Author: Will Parsons
Date: Sep 21, 2008 10:58

David Combs wrote:
> In article <9c7ab644-18fe-478f-9516-6b8f051aee7a@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> rustom gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Sep 21, 6:45 am, "Lennart Borgman (gmail)"
>>gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Any idea how to refer to the sandisk?
>>>
>>> It gets a drive letter, at least on my pc.
>>
>>Native emacs (for windows) is better than cygwin emacs
>
> Well, OK.
>
> Please, though, (so I can convince her to download yet
> another humongous emacs ("ntemacs" is what you mean?)
> onto her computer), please give a few reasons for
> saying that.

I don't know what's better in your situation, but for years now I've made
Cygwin an integral part of how I use Windows, but have always used the
native Windows Emacs (NTEmacs). The original reason for...
Show full article (1.47Kb)
no comments
Re: have installed cygwin, & "its" emacs. dired shows only subtree, no "up"         


Author: David Combs
Date: Sep 22, 2008 12:45

In article <4923507d-f4b7-493c-81f3-9f3977c80cbd@c22g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,
rustom gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Yeah well then I take it back :-)
>
>I myself have used unices for some 25 years and of late have been
>suffering the windows world.
>No not getting into OS-politics --just that I find I dont know how to
>use windows in a reasonable way and the common claim that cygwin makes
>windows into unix is far from true (for me).

Yeah -- haven't seen how to get a dtterm-like or xterm-like or even
vt100-like window that's FULL SCREEN SIZED! (Do you, or anyone,
knowhow to do that?)
>
>So even though emacs on windows is not quite as native on windows as

Am confused: are you comparing "emacs" (ANY emacs) running on windows
compared to emacs on unix/linux?
Show full article (3.07Kb)
no comments
1 2