|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: jmdrake_98jmdrake_98 Date: Jul 11, 2006 08:27
John Passaniti wrote:
>> guess my point is there is a VERY
>> large market for which 18 bit audio is clearly good enough.
>> I think we agree on that?
>
> Yep. I didn't say otherwise, and I don't write "consumer-grade" as if
> it was an insult.
As a "consumer" I'm not insulted. ;-)
> My biases are towards professional-grade digital audio systems since I
> work in that industry. And I guess I'm just somewhat disappointed that
> so far, it doesn't look like the SEAforth chip would be applicable to
> the kind of work we do.
It doesn't sound like this will be the only version of the chip.
> But now addressing the consumer market, my concern is price. The last
> price I read was $20 (in quantities of 1000, I think).
|
| Show full article (1.71Kb) |
|
| | 15 Comments |
|
|
Author: Peter DyballaPeter Dyballa Date: Aug 3, 2006 02:48
Am 03.08.2006 um 11:26 schrieb std:
> (standard-display-european t)
Throw that away! This belongs to to GNU Emacs 19 or such. set-
language-environment is another dangerous relict. Try prefer-coding-
system or set environment variables like LC_CTYPE.
There are also set-clipboard-coding-system and set-selection-coding-
system.
--
Greetings
Pete
Basic, n.:
A programming language. Related to certain social diseases in
that those who have it will not admit it in polite company.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: stdstd Date: Aug 3, 2006 03:05
Thanks a lot for the hint!
Now it works fine. My .emacs now has only
(set-language-environment 'latin-9)
(set-clipboard-coding-system 'utf-16le-dos)
Cheers,
St.
|
| Show full article (0.72Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: stdstd Date: Aug 3, 2006 03:18
Following your advice, I settled down in .emacs, which does the job
(prefer-coding-system 'latin-9)
(set-clipboard-coding-system 'latin-9)
Thanks again
By the way, is latin-9 a smart choice? (compared to latin-1, or other
utf-8 or -16...). I have no idea on these things.
St.
|
| Show full article (1.07Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Peter DyballaPeter Dyballa Date: Aug 3, 2006 04:26
Am 03.08.2006 um 12:18 schrieb std:
> By the way, is latin-9 a smart choice? (compared to latin-1, or other
> utf-8 or -16...). I have no idea on these things.
Depends – I use ISO Latin-9/ISO 8859-15 in LaTeX, because then I can
see € (ISO Latin-1 does not have the Euro currency), my usual
environment is UTF-8 based. GNU Emacs 22.0.50 still is not perfect...
|
| Show full article (1.50Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: stdstd Date: Aug 3, 2006 05:08
Thanks a lot Pete for this valuable information!
St
Peter Dyballa wrote:
> Am 03.08.2006 um 12:18 schrieb std:
>
>> By the way, is latin-9 a smart choice? (compared to latin-1, or other
>> utf-8 or -16...). I have no idea on these things.
>
> Depends...
|
| Show full article (1.59Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Aug 4, 2006 01:37
On Fri, Aug 04 2006, Peter Dyballa wrote:
> Am 04.08.2006 um 00:35 schrieb Reiner Steib:
>
>> Huch? Why do you think `set-language-environment' is bad?
>
> Setting it to German broke a few things in GNU Emacs 22.0.50. I
> don't remember any more which, but it felt like a relief when I
> removed this setting.
You should have used `M-x report-emacs-bug RET', I think.
Bye, Reiner.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Eli ZaretskiiEli Zaretskii Date: Aug 4, 2006 03:17
> From: Peter Dyballa
> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 01:12:43 +0200
> Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
>
>
> Am 04.08.2006 um 00:35 schrieb Reiner Steib:
> >> Huch? Why do you think `set-language-environment' is bad?
>
> Setting it to German broke a few things in GNU Emacs 22.0.50. I don't
> remember any more which, but it felt like a relief when I removed
> this setting.
If this happens again, please report that as a bug (to
emacs-devel@ gnu.org). If you can afford it, I'd urge you to restore
that setting and report any problems you see. There shouldn't be any,
now that you removed standard-display-european.
TIA
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Peter DyballaPeter Dyballa Date: Aug 4, 2006 03:51
Am 04.08.2006 um 12:17 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
> If this happens again, please report that as a bug (to
> emacs-devel@ gnu.org).
I think that what I call a bug is (was years back) meant as a feature
(excerpt from mule-cmds.el):
("de" "German" iso-8859-1)
This is completely wrong since almost ten years! We have the € as
currency, D-Mark is dead. Today eleven other countries have the €
(plus Montenegro, I think): http://www.ecb.de/bc/intro/html/map.en.html.
I sent a short bug report ...
> If you can afford it, I'd urge you to restore that setting and
> report any problems you see. There shouldn't be any, now that you
> removed standard-display-european.
No, I can't afford it! The time of 8 bit encodings has finished. My
OS is UTF-8 based. And I hope to die before I'll have to use a 7 or 8
bit OS again. And if I wouldn't die naturally, I'll find some way!
--
Greetings
Pete
|
| Show full article (1.04Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: David KastrupDavid Kastrup Date: Aug 4, 2006 04:07
> Am 04.08.2006 um 12:17 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
>
>> If this happens again, please report that as a bug (to
>> emacs-devel@ gnu.org). >
> I think that what I call a bug is (was years back) meant as a feature
> (excerpt from mule-cmds.el):
>
> ("de" "German" iso-8859-1)
>
> This is completely wrong since almost ten years! We have the € as
> currency, D-Mark is dead. Today eleven other countries have the €
> (plus Montenegro, I think):
> http://www.ecb.de/bc/intro/html/map.en.html.
>
> I sent a short bug report ...
I answered it. "de" is and has always been iso-8859-1. If you want
iso-8859-15, use "de@euro".
|
| Show full article (1.23Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
