|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: sashangsashang Date: Sep 2, 2008 19:07
Hi
Is there support for anti-aliased fonts in emacs? I installed emacs a
few days ago and tried to use it but found that the fonts were
rendered poorly. Some searching of the net revealed that I had to get
a special snapshot installed (apt-get install emacs-snapshot-gtk) to
get anti-aliased fonts. I find this surprising considering that it's
2008 and every other application I use supports anti-aliased fonts.
|
| |
|
| | 10 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Tim XTim X Date: Sep 3, 2008 02:37
> Hi
>
> Is there support for anti-aliased fonts in emacs? I installed emacs a
> few days ago and tried to use it but found that the fonts were
> rendered poorly. Some searching of the net revealed that I had to get
> a special snapshot installed (apt-get install emacs-snapshot-gtk) to
> get anti-aliased fonts. I find this surprising considering that it's
> 2008 and every other application I use supports anti-aliased fonts.
What you are after has been introduced only in the CVS branch of
emacs. I run the CVS version daily and its very stable most of the
time. The emacs-snapshot is a recent snapshot of the CVS head and works
well. None of the stable e.g. released versions of emacs prior to the 23
CVS branch have anti-aliased font support.
The new CVS version has a lot of nice new enhancements that are really
catching emacs up to what most would expect from the worlds greatest
editor, including -
|
| Show full article (1.81Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Ian EureIan Eure Date: Sep 2, 2008 21:34
On Sep 2, 2008, at 7:07 PM, sashang@ gmail.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there support for anti-aliased fonts in emacs? I installed emacs a
> few days ago and tried to use it but found that the fonts were
> rendered poorly. Some searching of the net revealed that I had to get
> a special snapshot installed (apt-get install emacs-snapshot-gtk) to
> get anti-aliased fonts. I find this surprising considering that it's
> 2008 and every other application I use supports anti-aliased fonts.
While it is 2008, the emacs version which comes with Debian Etch is
21.4, which is quite old. Emacs 21 was first released in 2001, and the
first version of Emacs 22 was in 2007.
I don't use Linux anymore, but I'd expect that recent Emacs packages
support AA fine.
Long story short, this is a Debian problem, not an Emacs problem.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Rupert SwarbrickRupert Swarbrick Date: Sep 3, 2008 10:10
Package: emacs
Priority: optional
Section: editors
Installed-Size: 48
Maintainer: Rob Browning defaultvalue.org>
Architecture: all
Source: emacs22
Version: 22.2+2-3
Provides: editor, emacsen, info-browser, mail-reader, news-reader
Depends: emacs22 | emacs22-gtk | emacs22-nox
Filename: pool/main/e/emacs22/emacs_22.2+2-3_all.deb
Size: 19564
MD5sum: d5f21152b0b334a3f6fe7ba622d7f602
SHA1: 7bebebf5df8cc0a20ef4ce9dd1dab481e29a877f
SHA256: 52727b53d384248e00f681079804b15428bf0df49854bddcbada2e9bd49c55db
Description: The GNU Emacs editor (metapackage)
GNU Emacs is the extensible self-documenting text editor.
This is a metapackage which will always depend on the latest Emacs
release.
Tag: devel::editor, role::dummy, role::metapackage, special::meta, suite::emacs, suite::gnu, use::editing ...
|
| Show full article (1.89Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Peter DyballaPeter Dyballa Date: Sep 3, 2008 11:06
Am 03.09.2008 um 19:10 schrieb Rupert Swarbrick:
> Emacs will shortly be 22.2+2-3 (!) in Debian.
These stable versions do not support font anti-aliasing. GTK can
produce nice menus, but it's recent GNU Emacs 23.0.60 (and before
23.0.50) from CVS that have the Xft patch incorporated and show
"strange" looking, i.e., anti-aliased text in the windows, buffers,
echo areas.
--
Greetings
Pete
The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is the day they
start selling vacuum cleaners.
– Ernest Jan Plugge
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Ian EureIan Eure Date: Sep 3, 2008 11:47
On Sep 3, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Rupert Swarbrick wrote:
> Ian Eure digg.com> writes:
>>
>> Long story short, this is a Debian problem, not an Emacs problem.
>
> ... as a long-time debian user, I feel I should just cut in with a
> knee-jerk defence: The debian developers are currently in the
> process of
> refining and polishing a new release, Lenny.
>
I wasn't attacking. I'm a longtime Debian user, and a former Debian
developer. The problem of balancing stability vs. recent software is
not a new one, and should be well-known to any Debian user.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Evans WinnerEvans Winner Date: Sep 3, 2008 12:56
Ian Eure digg.com> writes:
I don't use Linux anymore, but I'd expect that recent
Emacs packages support AA fine.
Just out of curiosity... what do you use?
In any case, I have been compiling Emacs from CVS on various
flavors of GNU/Linux for at least a couple of years now. On
a very few occasions I have had a problem, but in every case
I just don't do `make install' and wait a few days and the
problem gets fixed. By and large it does work with no
problems. I don't know how easy it is to compile Emacs on
MS Windows, but Lennart Borgman's EmacsW32 package is
pre-compiled and is a version 23 compile.
I have had problems attempting to compile on GNU/Hurd (the
one and only reason I am not using Hurd right now: no Emacs
= I don't use it) and some BSD variants, though I haven't
tried that hard on BSD.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Ian EureIan Eure Date: Sep 3, 2008 19:08
On Sep 3, 2008, at 12:56 PM, Evans Winner wrote:
> Ian Eure digg.com> writes:
>
> I don't use Linux anymore, but I'd expect that recent
> Emacs packages support AA fine.
>
> Just out of curiosity... what do you use?
>
Mac OS X. Aquamacs and Carbon Emacs both support antialiased fonts.
|
| Show full article (0.90Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Tim XTim X Date: Sep 15, 2008 00:47
Dan Espen MORE.mk.SPAMtelcordia.com> writes:
> Joost Diepenmaat writes:
>
>> dkcombs@ panix.com (David Combs) writes:
>>
>>
>>>>What you...
|
| Show full article (2.16Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|