|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: RobertRobert Date: Aug 29, 2008 01:06
Hi,
I just installed 22.2 (pre-built binary for Windows XP), but find it
slower than 21.3. I notice when opening C-files. I went straight back
to 21.3 now because of that.
I have not been following this group regularly, is this a well known
issue? Will this get faster in upcoming versions? The problem could
perhaps also be that the binary for Windows was built differently.
Have others seen the same as me?
-Robert
|
| |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
|
Author: Martin FischerMartin Fischer Date: Aug 29, 2008 04:22
Hi,
Robert writes:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed 22.2 (pre-built binary for Windows XP), but find it
> slower than 21.3. I notice when opening C-files. I went straight back
> to 21.3 now because of that.
How did you measure, that it is slower.
>
> I have not been following this group regularly, is this a well known
> issue? Will this get faster in upcoming versions? The problem could
> perhaps also be that the binary for Windows was built differently.
> Have others seen the same as me?
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: RobertRobert Date: Aug 29, 2008 04:35
On Aug 29, 1:22 pm, Martin Fischer wrote:> Hi,
>
> Robert writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just installed 22.2 (pre-built binary for Windows XP), but find it
> > slower than 21.3. I notice when opening C-files. I went straight back
> > to 21.3 now because of that.
>
> How did you measure, that it is slower.
I just noticed when opening a C source file I am working on. Counted
seconds now, see below.
|
| Show full article (1.36Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Alan MackenzieAlan Mackenzie Date: Aug 29, 2008 07:27
Hi, Robert!
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 01:06:52AM -0700, Robert wrote:
> Hi,
> I just installed 22.2 (pre-built binary for Windows XP), but find it
> slower than 21.3. I notice when opening C-files. I went straight back
> to 21.3 now because of that.
There was a bug in older CC Modes which made it "necessary" to scan
entire buffers when loading them. It was this:
#########################################################################
put the following into
a C file, somewhere near the beginning:
#warning for isn't a keyword here.
This will foul up the font locking in the rest of the file. Even more
dramatically, insert this:
|
| Show full article (2.38Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: RobertRobert Date: Sep 1, 2008 01:14
Hi Alan!
On Aug 29, 4:27 pm, Alan Mackenzie wrote:> Hi, Robert!
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 01:06:52AM -0700, Robert wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I just installed 22.2 (pre-built binary for Windows XP), but find it
>> slower than 21.3. I notice when opening C-files. I went straight back
>> to 21.3 now because of that.
>
> There was a bug in older CC Modes which made it "necessary" to scan
> entire buffers when loading them. It was this:
OK, didn't know there was a new CC-mode.
|
| Show full article (2.57Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: RobertRobert Date: Sep 1, 2008 01:47
Correction: The problem below with SLIME is not there when I revert to
an older version of SLIME, so this is not an issue for this group.
> With 2.22.91 I get another problem though, with SLIME:
>
> ---
> An error has occurred while loading `e:/home/rfo/.emacs':
>
> Wrong number of arguments: (lambda (&optional contribs) Setup Emacs so
> that lisp-mode buffers always use SLIME.
> CONTRIBS is a list of contrib packages to load. (when (member (quote
> lisp-mode) slime-lisp-modes) (add-hook (quote lisp-mode-hook) (quote
> slime-lisp-mode-hook))) (when contribs (add-to-list (quote load-path)
> (expand-file-name contrib slime-path)) (dolist (c contribs) (require
> c) (let ((init (intern (format %%s-init c)))) (when (fboundp init)
> (funcall init)))))), 2
> ---
>
> This does not happen in 21.3 or 22.2.
Yes it does, I needed an older version of SLIME.
|
| Show full article (0.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
