gnu.emacs.bug
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
gnu.emacs.bug only
 
Advanced search
December 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
1234567 49
891011121314 50
15161718192021 51
22232425262728 52
293031     1
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
gnu.emacs.bug Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  bug#1699: marked as done (patch for bug#1469 (term.el regression when dealing with long lines under bash))         


Author: Emacs bug Tracking System
Date: Dec 26, 2008 13:50

> From: Emacs bug Tracking System owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
> Subject: Re: bug#1699: this is not a bug, please close
> Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:45:07 +0100
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 22:18, Nicholas Maniscalco
> maniscalco.com> wrote:
>
>> #1699 can be closed. I misposted to the wrong list.
>
> Done.
>
>
> From: Emacs bug Tracking System owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
> Subject: patch for bug#1469 (term.el regression when dealing with long lines under bash)
> Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:19:00 -0800
> ...
Show full article (2.97Kb)
no comments
  bug#1699: this is not a bug, please close         


Author: Nicholas Maniscalco
Date: Dec 26, 2008 13:18

#1699 can be closed. I misposted to the wrong list.

I've since reposted my message to the appropriate bug case.
no comments
  bug#1469: patch for term.el regression when dealing with long lines under bash         


Author: Nicholas Maniscalco
Date: Dec 26, 2008 13:12

(I sent this to the wrong list earlier. Resending to, hopefully, the
right place this time.)

Here's a patch for bug#1469 (term.el regression when dealing with long
lines under bash).

* term.el (term-emulate-terminal): Decode substring just prior to
inserting it. (Bug#1469)

bug#1469 was introduced while fixing bug#1006. I verified this patch
against the repro steps in bug#1006 to make sure I haven't made a
regression.

Can someone please review? I'd appreciate any feedback.

-- Nicholas

Index: lisp/term.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/emacs/emacs/lisp/term.el,v
retrieving revision 1.107
diff -c -p -r1.107 term.el
*** lisp/term...
Show full article (1.53Kb)
no comments
  bug#1655: marked as done (23.0.60; visiting tarball marks the buffer as modified)         


Author: Emacs bug Tracking System
Date: Dec 26, 2008 12:45

> From: Emacs bug Tracking System owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
> Subject: fixed in tar-mode.el 1.131
> Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:36:40 +0100
> Andreas Schwab's recent changes to tar-mode.el fixed this issue.
>
>
> From: Emacs bug Tracking System owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
> Subject: 23.0.60; visiting tarball marks the buffer as modified
> Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:13:16 +0100
>
> Visiting a tar archive...
Show full article (3.08Kb)
no comments
  bug#1589: git's "--relative" option is relatively new :)         


Author: Eric Hanchrow
Date: Dec 26, 2008 11:13

The above fix relies on the
--relative" option to the 'git
diff-index' command. That option came into being in git 1.5.5, which
was released in April 2008.
no comments
  bug#1589: Possible fix         


Author: Eric Hanchrow
Date: Dec 26, 2008 10:28

The fix might be as simple as this. I'll use this for a while and see
how it goes.
Show full article (0.80Kb)
no comments
  bug#1701: problem computing image dimension of huge jpeg file         


Author: Andreas Schwab
Date: Dec 26, 2008 09:04

xah lee xahlee.org> writes:
> When using the following code full-size-img-linkify (see code below) on a
> large image that is 4248x544, but emacs report it as 30x30.

You should report that to the author of the get-image-dimensions
function.

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
no comments
  bug#1701: problem computing image dimension of huge jpeg file         


Author: Andreas Schwab
Date: Dec 26, 2008 09:04

xah lee xahlee.org> writes:
> When using the following code full-size-img-linkify (see code below) on a
> large image that is 4248x544, but emacs report it as 30x30.

You should report that to the author of the get-image-dimensions
function.

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
no comments
  bug#1708: 23.0.60; g_main_context_prepare() called recursively         


Author: Markus Triska
Date: Dec 26, 2008 04:00

From OSX 10.4, I log in via ssh to a remote machine R running Ubuntu
jaunty, and there do:

$ emacs -nw -Q -f server-start

In another terminal in OSX, I again ssh to R, and there do:

$ emacsclient -c

As expected, I get an X frame on the local machine (OSX). Now I close
the terminal in which I started the remote emacsclient, thus killing
the client. The remote server at this point shows the message:

server: Connection lost to X server `localhost:11.0'

Now I again ssh to R, and again do there:

$ emacsclient -c

Now, only a blank frame shows up, and the remote server repeatedly
shows the following message:

(emacs:11624): GLib-WARNING **: g_main_context_prepare() called
recursively from within a source's check() or prepare() member.

Information about Emacs on the remote machine R:
Show full article (2.02Kb)
no comments
  bug#1662: marked as done (23.0.60; Interactive not using minibuffer prompt face)         


Author: Emacs bug Tracking System
Date: Dec 26, 2008 02:05

> From: Emacs bug Tracking System owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
> Subject: Re: bug#1662: 23.0.60; Interactive not using minibuffer prompt face
> Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:55:35 +0100
> Fixed as
>
> * callint.c (Fcall_interactively): For `c', `k', and `K' prompt
> in minibuffer-prompt face. (Bug#1662)
>
> Thanks for the report, martin.
>
>
>
> From: Emacs bug Tracking System owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
> Subject: 23.0.60; Interactive not using minibuffer prompt face
> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:43:24 +0900
>
> The minibuffer prompt displayed...
Show full article (4.42Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9