> On Sat, 9 Aug 2008 08:26:15 -0700 (PDT), Chris X live.co.uk> wrote:

>>Why don’t we kick the filth out of parliament
>>and try some of them for fraud and being traitorous to this nation?

>
> Because in a monarchy you do as you are told! You have no influence on your rulers behaviour!
>

>
> ***********************************************************************
> Always remember when discussing british politics that british governments are only ever chosen by a minority of the electorate...

> Bazzer Smith wrote:

>> Nobody wanst this law, neither the buyer nor the seller
>> neither asked for it so why is itintroduced?
>>

> It was introduced as a means of slowing the housing boom.

>Jellore wrote:

>> On Jul 25, 6:33 pm, Blue there.com> wrote:

>>> Labour never got a mandate from the English.
>>> Now Labour have lost their celtic frindge support.
>>>
>>> Gordon Brown never had...

> abelard wrote:

>>
>> 1 in 100 homes are intruded in the uk on by 'social' 'services' every
>> year....
>>
>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/camilla_cavendish/article4346958...
>> "Intriguingly, only one person challenged our view that the system is
>> unaccountable. That was Sir Rodney Brooke, chair of the General Social
>> Care Council. I have seen no evidence that the GSCC has disciplined a
>> single social worker denounced by appeal court judges in the past few
>> years. But I hope to be corrected. Nor did any one of the eminent
>> bodies who wrote to us deny that miscarriages of justice occur. Some
>> of the glib references have made miscarriages of justice sound like a
>> standard occupational hazard. There are 550,000 referrals to social
>> services every year. It makes the Birmingham Six fade by comparison.
>>
>> Yesterday, Frank Lockyer wrote to point out that the authorities have
>> closed ranks in response to our campaign. "The agencies defend ...

>> Conservative support, at 45%%, is at a 20-year high. That would give
>> David Cameron a landslide victory as big as Labour's win in 1997,
>> with some 400 seats.

>
> Exactly how do you define a landslide victory.
> The term implies overwhelming support of the electorate but in
> reality that never actually happens,does it?

>>Conservative support, at 45%%, is at a 20-year high. That would give
>>David Cameron a landslide victory as big as Labour's win in 1997, with
>>some 400 seats.

>
>Exactly how do you define a landslide victory.
>The term implies overwhelming support of the electorate but in reality that never actually happens,does it?

> He overseas the british part of an illegal occupation of an arab oil producer which costs britain billions each year.
> Billions which could have been invested here in the uk.
> In effect he is asking the arabs to subsidise the financial shortfall arising from that illegality.
>