<? xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <atom:link rel="search"
                   href="http://www.nnseek.com/nnseek_com_os_descr.xml"
                   type="application/opensearchdescription+xml"
                   title="Search in newsgroups" />
        <title>Search result for hiatus,public</title>
        <link>http://www.nnseek.com/fr.soc.politique/hiatus,public_s.html</link>
        <description>Search results for hiatus,public</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:12:32 CEST</lastBuildDate>
        

                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Re: Dave Moore's recent hiatus]]></title>
            <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.support.childprotectiveservices/dave_moore_s_recent_hiatus_88837001m.html</guid>
            <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.support.childprotectiveservices/dave_moore_s_recent_hiatus_88837001m.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[... female child.    Now there is, it's just not you.    I've always stated that it wasn't me....again, with ample evidence to back  up my claim.    If it is NOT you, why would they send YOU a copy?    Because it's a <b>public</b> record, which ANYONE can get?    Keep playing dumb....Greg will still believe you.  Your fat ass has long  been nailed to the wall with everyone else, I think :)    <a href="http://www" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">http://www</a>....<br><br>
                <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
                    <tr>
                        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.support.childprotectiveservices/">alt.support.childprotectiveservices</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.support.childprotectiveservices/david_moore_supermoron_82306697t.html">no comments</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.support.childprotectiveservices/dave_moore_s_recent_hiatus_88837001m.html">Reply</a></td>
                    </tr></table>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:12:32 CEST</pubDate>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Re: Dave Moore's recent hiatus]]></title>
            <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.men/dave_moore_s_recent_hiatus_123481229m.html</guid>
            <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.men/dave_moore_s_recent_hiatus_123481229m.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[... female child.    Now there is, it's just not you.    I've always stated that it wasn't me....again, with ample evidence to back  up my claim.    If it is NOT you, why would they send YOU a copy?    Because it's a <b>public</b> record, which ANYONE can get?    Keep playing dumb....Greg will still believe you.  Your fat ass has long  been nailed to the wall with everyone else, I think :)    <a href="http://www" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">http://www</a>....<br><br>
                <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
                    <tr>
                        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.men/">soc.men</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.men/david_moore_supermoron_113670797t.html">no comments</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.men/dave_moore_s_recent_hiatus_123481229m.html">Reply</a></td>
                    </tr></table>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:12:32 CEST</pubDate>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Re: Purging after hiatus]]></title>
            <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.usenet.offlinereader.forteagent/purging_after_hiatus_43329755m.html</guid>
            <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.usenet.offlinereader.forteagent/purging_after_hiatus_43329755m.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[... to see it?  I am only interested in recent (i.e. < 1 day messages).  Again - thanks!    Doesn't "Sample Recent Headers" (as I told you) work?  --   Mark Lloyd  <a href="http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com</a>    "Unlike biological evolution. 'intelligent design' is  not a genuine scientific theory and, therefore, has  no place in the curriculum of our nation's <b>public</b>  school classes." -- Ted Kennedy<br><br>
                <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
                    <tr>
                        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.usenet.offlinereader.forteagent/">alt.usenet.offlinereader.forteagent</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.usenet.offlinereader.forteagent/purging_after_hiatus_43280091t.html">no comments</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.usenet.offlinereader.forteagent/purging_after_hiatus_43329755m.html">Reply</a></td>
                    </tr></table>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:26:33 CEST</pubDate>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Re: Purging after hiatus]]></title>
            <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.usenet.offlinereader.forteagent/purging_after_hiatus_43285211m.html</guid>
            <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.usenet.offlinereader.forteagent/purging_after_hiatus_43285211m.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[... seen to want the most recent day's messages only. Instead of  getting new headers, you could get the last day's headers (use "Sample  Recent Headers").  --   Mark Lloyd  <a href="http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com</a>    "Unlike biological evolution. 'intelligent design' is  not a genuine scientific theory and, therefore, has  no place in the curriculum of our nation's <b>public</b>  school classes." -- Ted Kennedy<br><br>
                <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
                    <tr>
                        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.usenet.offlinereader.forteagent/">alt.usenet.offlinereader.forteagent</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.usenet.offlinereader.forteagent/purging_after_hiatus_43280091t.html">no comments</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.usenet.offlinereader.forteagent/purging_after_hiatus_43285211m.html">Reply</a></td>
                    </tr></table>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:51:12 CEST</pubDate>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[BUSH ADMITS HE APPROVED TORTURE - hiatus in my unlikely suspect posts.]]></title>
            <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/misc.activism.progressive/bush_admits_he_approved_torture_hiatus_in_my_unlikely_119897049m.html</guid>
            <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/misc.activism.progressive/bush_admits_he_approved_torture_hiatus_in_my_unlikely_119897049m.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[... outrage about one   news item after another.      Today some folk wondered about a <b>hiatus</b> in my postings --- and YES there   has been a <b>hiatus</b> connected with my having hip resurfacing on the 24th    I didn'...Abu   Ghraib.  It's  understood that many of the photos are too sadistically   graphic to be made <b>public</b>.    Still,  the  official  U.S. denials of torture continued until earlier   this  month...<br><br>
                <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
                    <tr>
                        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/misc.activism.progressive/">misc.activism.progressive</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/misc.activism.progressive/bush_admits_he_approved_torture_hiatus_in_my_unlikely_119897049t.html">no comments</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/misc.activism.progressive/bush_admits_he_approved_torture_hiatus_in_my_unlikely_119897049m.html">Reply</a></td>
                    </tr></table>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:56:25 CEST</pubDate>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Re: Maybe Elizabeth Edwards and Jessica Alba should go on hiatus together.  After all, they DO share the same problem!]]></title>
            <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_41079440m.html</guid>
            <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_41079440m.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[... that she is  getting WAYYYYY too much play, but she keeps going on photo ops,  interviews, etc.  These "celebs" who think they are getting too much play know what they  need to be doin'.  Just get out of the <b>public</b> limelight.  Hey, some of  youse, we don't wanna be seein' anyway!  Shouldn't you be watching the Paris Hilton Channel?   Nah. All summer re-runs.<br><br>
                <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
                    <tr>
                        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/">alt.politics.usa</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_41079440t.html">no comments</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_41079440m.html">Reply</a></td>
                    </tr></table>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:14:22 CEST</pubDate>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Re: Maybe Elizabeth Edwards and Jessica Alba should go on hiatus together.  After all, they DO share the same problem!]]></title>
            <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.republican/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_56962968m.html</guid>
            <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.republican/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_56962968m.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[... that she is  getting WAYYYYY too much play, but she keeps going on photo ops,  interviews, etc.  These "celebs" who think they are getting too much play know what they  need to be doin'.  Just get out of the <b>public</b> limelight.  Hey, some of  youse, we don't wanna be seein' anyway!  Shouldn't you be watching the Paris Hilton Channel?   Nah. All summer re-runs.<br><br>
                <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
                    <tr>
                        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.republican/">alt.politics.republican</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.republican/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_56962968t.html">no comments</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.republican/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_56962968m.html">Reply</a></td>
                    </tr></table>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:14:22 CEST</pubDate>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Re: Maybe Elizabeth Edwards and Jessica Alba should go on hiatus together.  After all, they DO share the same problem!]]></title>
            <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_40503696m.html</guid>
            <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_40503696m.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[...She keeps protesting that she is  getting WAYYYYY too much play, but she keeps going on photo ops,  interviews, etc.      Pick on cancer victims much?  lol    These "celebs" who think they are getting too much play know what they  need to be doin'.  Just get out of the <b>public</b> limelight.  Hey, some of  youse, we don't wanna be seein' anyway!      More made-up crazyass republicrap.     <br><br>
                <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
                    <tr>
                        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/">alt.politics.usa</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_40491920t.html">no comments</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_40503696m.html">Reply</a></td>
                    </tr></table>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:05:36 CEST</pubDate>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Re: Maybe Elizabeth Edwards and Jessica Alba should go on hiatus together.  After all, they DO share the same problem!]]></title>
            <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.republican/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_56138648m.html</guid>
            <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.republican/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_56138648m.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[...She keeps protesting that she is  getting WAYYYYY too much play, but she keeps going on photo ops,  interviews, etc.      Pick on cancer victims much?  lol    These "celebs" who think they are getting too much play know what they  need to be doin'.  Just get out of the <b>public</b> limelight.  Hey, some of  youse, we don't wanna be seein' anyway!      More made-up crazyass republicrap.     <br><br>
                <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
                    <tr>
                        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.republican/">alt.politics.republican</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.republican/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_56122264t.html">no comments</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.republican/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_56138648m.html">Reply</a></td>
                    </tr></table>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:05:36 CEST</pubDate>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Re: Maybe Elizabeth Edwards and Jessica Alba should go on hiatus together.  After all, they DO share the same problem!]]></title>
            <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_40644496m.html</guid>
            <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_40644496m.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[... WAYYYYY too much play, but she keeps going on photo ops,  interviews, etc.  These "celebs" who think they are getting too much play know what they  need to be doin'.  Just get out of the <b>public</b> limelight.  Hey, some of  youse, we don't wanna be seein' anyway!    Shouldn't you be watching the Paris Hilton Channel?         --   Posted via a free Usenet account from <a href="http://www.teranews" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">http://www.teranews</a>....<br><br>
                <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
                    <tr>
                        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/">alt.politics.usa</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_40491920t.html">no comments</a></td>
                        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
                        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.politics.usa/maybe_elizabeth_edwards_and_jessica_alba_should_go_40644496m.html">Reply</a></td>
                    </tr></table>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 20:28:37 CEST</pubDate>
        </item>
            </channel>
</rss>