fa.freebsd.stable
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
fa.freebsd.stable only
 
Advanced search
August 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
    123 31
45678910 32
11121314151617 33
18192021222324 34
25262728293031 35
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
fa.freebsd.stable Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  How reliable is make delete-old and make delete-old-libs on 7.1-PRERELEASE?         


Author: Dan Langille
Date: Aug 29, 2008 21:07

How reliable is make delete-old and make delete-old-libs on 7.1-PRERELEASE?

I ask because I just upgraded a remote system from 6.3-stable to
7.1-PRERELEASE. All seems well so far. Apps are running fine. I just
figure I should do this final bit.

FYI, I've written up how I did this migration:

http//www.freebsddiary.org/upgrade-6.3-to-7.0.php

At the end, I've included the output of make check-old. Does it look
good to you?

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
no comments
  HEADSUP: 7-stable considered to be OK again         


Author: John Birrell
Date: Aug 29, 2008 17:45

The feedback I've been getting indicates that it's safe to go back in the
water again.

--
John Birrell
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
no comments
  Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade / Should be OK now         


Author: Dan Allen
Date: Aug 29, 2008 16:33

Dan Allen wrote previously:
> well I got bit by this and am dead in the water.

I got the tools and built everything okay once again. Thanks to
everyone for the help!

Dan

_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
no comments
  stable/6 make and build errors         


Author: Sean Bruno
Date: Aug 29, 2008 14:22

I've run into a variance in behavior between my SVN updated tree and my
CVSUP'd tree that is befuddling me.

Running a make depend on two freshly updated trees seems to generate
errors with my SVN tree but not my CVSUP tree. Here is the output of
the SVN tree. This is freshly checked out from stable/6 not updated.
Show full article (1.57Kb)
3 Comments
  Detangling the ppbus/ppc interrupt stuff..         


Author: John Baldwin
Date: Aug 29, 2008 12:14

So I have a patch to try and straighten out the ppbus/ppc interrupt stuff a
bit. Rather than passing IRQ numbers around as ivars, etc., ppc is smart
enough to let child devices ask for SYS_RES_IRQ rid 0 and let them use its
assigned IRQ resource. It then uses an interrupt event to mange the list of
child interrupt handlers which it invokes from its own interrupt handler. I
don't currently have any boxes running HEAD that have anything hooked up to
their ppc0 port, so I'd appreciate folks testing this if possible.

http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/ppc_intr.patch

--
John Baldwin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
no comments
  Re: Recent breakage due to the DTrace merge         


Author: Steve Bertrand
Date: Aug 29, 2008 11:09

John Birrell wrote:
> I know that there are issues with upgrading from 6.X (where .X isn't the
> most recent on RELENG6). I'll need help from someone with an old 6.2
> box (say) to test out the builds. I have no hardware to run an old version
> of 6 on.

This is most likely not exactly what you are after, but:

Earlier in the week I put a message to -stable asking how to upgrade a
minimal install of a system that runs entirely from USB key. This key
was running 6.2.

Using a host build machine running 7.0, setting DESTDIR accordingly, and
configuring numerous NO_* in /etc/make.conf, I was not only able to
achieve my minimal install using buildworld etc process, I was able to
upgrade it to stable sources from this morning successfully.

I'm now off to upgrade a box that is actually _running_ 6.2, and I'll
report back with any details.
Show full article (1.08Kb)
no comments
  WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade / Should be OK now         


Author: Dan Allen
Date: Aug 29, 2008 09:45

Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing builds. I
tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=-g trick but to no avail.

I get this:

cc: Internal error: segmentation fault: 11 (program ld)

I do not have a backup ld. (My bad.)

Where can I get a good one? I cannot find any servers with built
individual tools.

Thanks,

Dan Allen

_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
12 Comments
  Re: Recent breakage due to the DTrace merge         


Author: John Baldwin
Date: Aug 29, 2008 08:25

On Thursday 28 August 2008 06:36:30 pm John Birrell wrote:
> It goes without saying that this didn't go anywhere near as smoothly as
> I hoped it would. My attention to detail was less than perfect. Sorry
> for the pain I've caused.
>
> A big thanks to those who've put work into fixing the mistakes, particularly
> jhb, kib and csjp.
>
> What I'd like right now is for anybody with unresolved problems to write
> a summry and email it to me so I can see what needs to be addressed.
>
> I know that there are issues with upgrading from 6.X (where .X isn't the
> most recent on RELENG6). I'll need help from someone with an old 6.2
> box (say) to test out the builds. I have no hardware to run an old version
> of 6 on.
Show full article (1.29Kb)
no comments
  Re: Recent breakage due to the DTrace merge         


Author: Steve Bertrand
Date: Aug 29, 2008 05:16

John Birrell wrote:
> I know that there are issues with upgrading from 6.X (where .X isn't the
> most recent on RELENG6). I'll need help from someone with an old 6.2
> box (say) to test out the builds. I have no hardware to run an old version
> of 6 on.

I've got a 6.2 box that needs upgrading anyway, so I'll bite. The
install was from an ISO image and has never been upgraded, so I know
it's not most recent.

Do you simply want an upgrade to RELENG_7 and then a report of any breakage?

Steve
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
no comments
  [releng_7 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64         


Author: FreeBSD Tinderbox
Date: Aug 29, 2008 03:08

TB --- 2008-08-29 08:40:50 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-08-29 08:40:50 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2008-08-29 08:40:50 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-08-29 08:41:03 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-08-29 08:41:03 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_7/ia64/ia64/supfile
TB --- 2008-08-29 08:41:09 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe)
TB --- 2008-08-29 08:41:09 - cd /src
TB --- 2008-08-29 08:41:09 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld
>>> World build started on Fri Aug 29 08:41:10 UTC 2008
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
>>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims
>>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools
>>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree
>>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree
>>> stage 2.3: build tools
>>> stage 3: cross tools
>>> stage 4.1: building includes
>>> stage 4.2: building libraries
>>> stage 4.3: make dependencies
>>> stage 4.4: building everything ...
Show full article (2.53Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9