Re: Amy Weinhaus Allowed Politically Incorrect Rant
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
dk.politik only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Amy Weinhaus Allowed Politically Incorrect Rant         

Group: dk.politik · Group Profile
Author: pinknebulous
Date: Jun 12, 2008 15:22

"The Starmaker" ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:9mf154p39tb2n8ed6fofms5pslt8k47omd@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:48:43 GMT, "pinknebulous"
> yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"The Starmaker" ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
>>news:490154h1mnocpbhib98ri4g7r81airuqma@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:50:27 GMT, "pinknebulous"
>>> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"charley" aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:8bcde2c6-fb23-435b-8ca5-13e16a68bb1a@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>On Jun 10, 10:55 am, St Georges Day April 23rd
>>>>googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Amy Winehouse Allowed Politically Incorrect Rant
>>>>> by Ian Mosley
>>>>>
>>>>> What happens when a British pop singer gets stoned out of her mind and
>>>>> starts gibbering out a long string of racial epithets that would get
>>>>> anyone else a prison stretch under Britain's draconian Race Relations
>>>>> Act? Well, if you're a Jewish pop star like Amy Winehouse-not a bloody
>>>>> thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> According to the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz (and not reported much of
>>>>> anywhere else) "A video showing British singer Amy Winehouse singing a
>>>>> racist chant and apparently surrounded by drug paraphernalia has been
>>>>> released by the [London-based] News of The World tabloid. In the home
>>>>> footage, filmed by the Grammy Award-winning singer's husband Blake
>>>>> Fielder-Civic, Winehouse sings a racist football chant to the tune of
>>>>> the British children's song 'Heads, Shoulders, Knees and Toes'. In
>>>>> place of the conventional words, however, Winehouse sings with a
>>>>> friend: 'Blacks, pakis, gooks and nips.' The clip shows a coffee table
>>>>> in the background upon which six cigarette lighters are resting,
>>>>> alongside a substance which looks like heroin on a foil..According to
>>>>> the British tabloid, it received the video from a friend of the 24-
>>>>> year-old singer's, who also handed over a number of photographs in
>>>>> which Winehouse is seen apparently taking drugs with Fielder-Civic."
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have any illusion that these laws really aren't enforced or
>>>>> that they wouldn't punish a woman for a thought crime, consider what
>>>>> happened in France recently. World famous actress Bridgette Bardot was
>>>>> recently fined for offending Third World invaders in her native
>>>>> France. An article in the Augusta Chronicle reports "Facts are facts.
>>>>> Lies are lies. Mistakes are mistakes. But what is a 'wrong' opinion?
>>>>> Ask officials in France, who regularly punish people for thinking and
>>>>> saying the 'wrong' things. Former film star Brigitte Bardot is the
>>>>> latest victim of the Thought Police. She's been criminally convicted
>>>>> of saying the wrong things about Muslims in France.. She was fined
>>>>> $23,325, and ordered to pay an anti-racism group another $1,555 ...
>>>>> (for saying she is) 'tired of being led by the nose by this population
>>>>> (the Muslims in France) that is destroying us, destroying our country
>>>>> by imposing its acts.'"
>>>>>
>>>>> Do I really need to add that Scotland Yard and the London
>>>>> Metropolitian Police have shown a passionate disinterest in opening
>>>>> any kind of investigation either into Amy's politically incorrect and
>>>>> (in Britain) illegal speech or the on-camera drug use? The Jews seem
>>>>> to have stolen Harry Potter's cloak of invisibility and dropped it
>>>>> over Amy Winehouse a long time ago. At least the authorities don't
>>>>> seem to see her. Why hasn't she been pulled over and thrown in prison
>>>>> for drug use? If Mel Gibson could be booked for drunk driving, why not
>>>>> Amy Winehouse for illegal drugs?
>>>>>
>>>>> Britain is notorious for checkbook journalism, so I imagine those
>>>>> tapes set the News of the World back a few quid. With "friends" like
>>>>> that willing to sell her out, literally, Amy doesn't need any enemies.
>>>>> Winehouse recently released an album of Hanukkah songs. No, I'm not
>>>>> making that up. A recent song of hers was entitled "Rehab." Not joking
>>>>> about that either.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Ha'aretz article notes: "Fielder-Civic, 26, is currently in jail
>>>>> facing trial for Grievous Bodily Harm, in addition to conspiracy to
>>>>> pervert the course of justice. In another section of the video he asks
>>>>> Winehouse to perform a sex act on him in the public stairwell of a
>>>>> hotel." Ah, what reverence the Jewish people display for the
>>>>> institution of marriage!
>>>>>
>>>>> The Jews are some pretty filthy people. Why do we let them rule us?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/amy-winehouse-allowed-...
>>>>
>>>>Come on stop it with the anti Jew stuff. Jews aren't the problem,
>>>>radical Islam is. Jews want to live a free and non violent life.
>>>>Radical muslims want to chop off your head for wanting to go to a
>>>>movie. I listened to a podcast on Itunes about a town in Iraq and its
>>>>people were being held hostage by Al Qaeda. AQ wanted the women in
>>>>burkas, they weren't allowed to go to movies or drink(some of them
>>>>admitted to drinking) and if they didn't like you they'd kill you.
>>>>Well the Iraqi's and US went in and routed AQ. So they interviewed
>>>>both Shia and Sunni that lived in this town and the common theme was
>>>>they didn't want to be ruled by zealots. So tell me, what Jew is a
>>>>zealot? Turn your hatred to those who want to stifle your freedoms
>>>>nitwit.
>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>Well said. I really don't get the misguided hatred.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Misguided? I think the poster *knows*
>>
>>Shut up, Davila.
>>
>
> Dust in homes consists of human skin cells, plant pollen, human and
> animal hairs, textile fibers, paper fibers, minerals from outdoor soil
> and dust, and many other materials which may be found in the local
> environment.[1] The precise composition of domestic dust can vary
> widely:
> The quantity and composition of house dust varies greatly with
> seasonal and environmental factors such as the surroundings, exchange
> of outside air, age of the house, building materials and their
> condition, and the quantity of furniture and carpets, as well as their
> state of preservation. It varies further with ventilation and heating
> systems, cleaning habits, activities of the occupants or users of a
> room, etc. House dust consists of inorganic and organic matter, yet
> the relative proportions of these components may vary considerably. On
> the other hand, house dust from residences of animal owners with worn
> out carpets may consist nearly completely of organic material. The
> proportion of organic matter in 318 house dust samples was found to
> vary between <5%% and >95%% (Butte and Walker, 1994). Fergusson et al.
> (1986) reported the organic content of house dust from 11 homes in
> Christchurch, New Zealand, to be within the range from 25.7%% to 41.5%%.
> Floor dust from seven Danish offices had a mean organic fraction of
> 33%% (M
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!