And of my further 17 November 2004 [SUPER: #382 / #29 - Deeming/
Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 - Sinking Light; Tetra: #67 - Darkening /
EGO: #316 / #61 - Virtuosity at Using 'Beneath'/ Virtue of Humility;
I-Ching: H64 - Before Completion; Tetra: #78 - On the Verge]
correspondence again to Mike D’Argaville as Legal Counsel, thanking-you
for your advice dated 16 November 2004 [SUPER: #428 / #40 - Reversal/
Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 - Sinking Light; Tetra: #68 - Dimming /
EGO: #481 / #5 - Natural Guidance/ Function of Emptiness; I-Ching: H63 -
Completion & After; Tetra: #73 - Completion] concerning a finding by the
Panel Chair Mr. Michael Arnold:
“I noted that the Financial Industry Complaints Service regards the
complaint as being outside their jurisdiction because aspects of the
complaint were before [the] Victorian Civil Administrative Tribunal and
the Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission.
It is noted that there was a return of the material as CDROM containing
my preliminary [copy] of the vMeme / Moment Kabbalistic Year View of the
Grapple Calendar, which I conveyed with the 1 November 2004
correspondence.
This documentation was not only substantiation of my claim and is
returned herewith, but disproves the categorical assertion made [by] the
Financial Industry Complaints Service, on the basis of the history of
the complaint, being the previous direction of the complaint to the Life
Insurance Complaints Service, Equal Opportunity and Human Rights
Commission and the Victorian Civil Administrative Appeals Tribunal, that
I am a ‘vexatious litigant’.”
The enclosed document dated 4 August 2008 [SUPER: #431 / #75 -
Destructiveness of Envy/ Harmed Through Greed; I-Ching: H52 - Inaction;
Tetra: #72 - Hardness / EGO: #493 / #81 - Making the Essence Clear/
Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 - Peace; Tetra: #15 - Reach]
made to the Insurer and to which their return recommendation with the
‘entitlement being paid until my 65th year’.
With respect to the Insurer’s 20 June 2008 advice made in response to my
desire to obtain Doctor Keks medical report of the 4 April 2007
consultation “so that you may be ‘cognizant of the medical opportunity
which (you) have to undertake on his (sic) the Professor’s advice”.
That this refusal as determination not to release this report to me, is
made under the National Privacy Principles on the exceptional grounds:
“access to the personal information about that person, except where, in
the case of health information, providing access could pose a serious
threat to the life or health of any individual. We have determined that
Dr Keks report (at the doctor’s own request) falls within this category
and that we, therefore, cannot release the report to you.”
In my 4 August 2008 advice to the Insurer in relation to my due
diligence with respect to providing the Insurer with all such
information as evidence of my claim, I wrote: “I had provided the
additional advice from Dr Kate McConnon, the [Victoria] Police Medical
Officer and the appointed principal officer under the Act, by letter
dated 15 May 2007 [Super: #324 / #12 - Numbing Effect of the
Conventional/ Abstaining from Desire; I-Ching: H6 – Conflict; Tetra: #25
- Contention; Ego: #322 / #49 - Sage's Constancy/ Trust in Virtue;
I-Ching: H3 - Initial Difficulties; Tetra: #4 - Barrier] as
determination to release my Police Service Medical Files under the
provisions of the [Freedom of Information Act of 1982 (Victoria)]. This
medical history, as records of a 10-year service history commencing as
adolescent 17 year old with Cadet service anti-tetanus injections on 14
February 1978, graduation sworn member and registered number 21527 on 13
July 1979, a change of name on 9 July 1987 and a resignation from the
Victoria Police on 18 July 1988.
These medical records confirm my view of having as a consideration of
ethical conduct, voluntarily submitted blood specimens on 10 September
1986 following a motor vehicle accident (bicycle struck by car), made to
the Police Medical Officer and of their subsequent recommendations on
the confirmed original diagnosis of a HIV status acquired as conduct,
that may be considered symptomatic of post traumatic stress syndrome,
following my experience of the Russell Street bombing of 27 March 1986
as hyper-arousal of the sympathetic nervous system and increased
sensitivity of the startle reflex.
That no entry occurs in my medical records with respect to this
experience is due to the circumstance that I regarded my participation
in the bombing as a matter of duty. And I enjoyed a particular mutual
and professional respect with Doctor Allan Beech as the Police Medical
Officer, who was prepared to manage my HIV status, until I was legally
discharged from the Victoria Police on 18 July 1988.”
That Dr Kate McConnon, the Victoria Police Medical Officer and the
appointed principal officer under the Act, had by letter dated 15 May
2007 [Super: #324 / #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional/ Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 – Conflict; Tetra: #25 - Contention; Ego: #322
/ #49 - Sage's Constancy/ Trust in Virtue; I-Ching: H3 - Initial
Difficulties; Tetra: #4 - Barrier] did allow “access to the personal
information about that person” after similarly making a consideration
under the National Privacy Principles, and concluded otherwise. That
the exception: “in the case of health information, providing access
could pose a serious threat to the life or health of any
individual.”—The Victoria Police as my former employer have determined
me request does not fall within this category and that released my
Police Service Medical Files under the provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act of 1982 (Victoria) to me.
Furthermore, as paragraph 21 of my 30 September 2006 [SUPER: #366 / #58
- Political Reversal/ Adaptation to Change; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution;
Tetra: #29 - Decisiveness / EGO: #315 / #25 - What's behind it all?/
Imaging the Mysterious; I-Ching: H62 - Small Excess; Tetra: #10 -
Defectiveness/Distortion] correspondence delivered by Registered Post:
[Ref: RD 51092289] to the President – Novell Asia Pacific Pty Ltd and
delivered 6 October 2006 [SUPER: #307 / #42 - Generating Things/
Reason's Modifications; I-Ching: H60 - Restraint; Tetra: #52 - Measure /
EGO: #479 / #25 - What's behind it all?/ Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Small Excess; Tetra: #10 - Defectiveness/Distortion], I
said namely: “This letter shows an understanding of the idea of ‘total
and permanent disability’ being then further associated to ‘exclusions’
through an initiating administrative request on ‘terms and conditions of
employment’ made to the employer Novell Pty. Limited subsequent to their
takeover as acquisition of WordPerfect Corporation, in relation to
Insurances as Salary Continuance Group Name: Novell Pty. Limited policy
and MLC Life’s Novell Pty Limited Superannuation Plan.
The reason for this enquiry on the nature of ‘total and permanent
disability’ is that the Insured was personally and socially acquainted
with, and had a loyal sense of duty to his former employer Mr. Bruce
Bastian as co-inventor, co-founder and owner of WordPerfect Corporation
(WordPerfect Pacific).
Whilst the WordPerfect Corporation executive then knew the Insured’s
health and well-being, these was some apprehension by the Insured as to
whether the subsequent employer Novell would, as it metabolised the
organizational acquisition, continue to show any favourable regard
towards the Insured medical status.”
The letter was also confirmation that there was no ‘favourable regard’
shown by this subsequent employer Novell as singular lack of response to
my earlier correspondence dated 4 August 2006 [SUPER: #431 / #75 -
Destructiveness of Envy/ Harmed Through Greed; I-Ching: H52 - Inaction;
Tetra: #72 - Hardness / EGO: #493 / #81 - Making the Essence Clear/
Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 - Peace; Tetra: #15 - Reach] and
delivered by Registered Post item RD51089554 on 14 August 2006 [SUPER:
#433 / #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts/ Emptiness & Non-Existence;
I-Ching: H18 - Arresting Decay; Tetra: #26 - Endeavor / EGO: #346 / #50
- Fantasies of Avoiding Death/ Estimation of Life; I-Ching: H2 - Passive
Principle/Earth; Tetra: #77 - Compliance] wherein I stated: “I am
saddened, that Novell Asia Pacific, beyond a past bestowal of a 5 year
Employee Service Recognition Certificate in regard of past employment
with Novell Asia Pacific, should so disregard my humanity as to not
provide ‘a letter of advice to the Insurer and myself with specificity to:
a) The Employer and the Insurer’s responsibility to have properly
advised of an Insurance provision’s effect on ‘total and permanent
disability’ associated to ‘exclusions’ on HIV/AIDS;
b) Acknowledging this as the basis of the complaint to the New South
Wales Anti-Discrimination Board on 12 December 1995. For which, as
resolution, Novell Pty. Limited made a donation to an AIDS charity.
c) That I have in January 1996 voluntarily entered into Superannuation
Retirement and voluntarily ceased to actively perform the full time
duties of my occupation and ceased to be an eligible employee of the
Employer Novell.
d) A statement from Novell acknowledging my 5 year employee recognition
certificate as service to Novell Asia Pacific (WordPerfect Pacific) and
of the
a. Date the Insured Employee retires or voluntarily ceases to actively
perform the full time duties of his/her occupation or is dismissed from
employment;
b. Date the Insured Employee ceases to be an eligible employee of the
Employer;
I further advised within my correspondence, that in the continuing
absence of which, a view may be formed that Novell Pty Limited has
failed with regards to its duty of care in relation to Insurances as
Salary Continuance Group Name: Novell Pty Limited policy and MLC Life’s
Novell Pty Limited Superannuation Plan offered as ‘terms and conditions
of employment’ subsequent to Novell Corporation’s takeover as
acquisition of WordPerfect Corporation and their Australian subsidiary
WordPerfect Pacific, and responsibility to advise of a provisions effect
on ‘total and permanent disability’ associated to ‘exclusions’ that were
sought in July 1995 in accordance with Section 37 – ‘Notification of
Unusual Terms’ of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984: “An insurer may not
rely on a provision included in a contract of insurance (not being a
prescribed contract) of a kind that is not usually included in contracts
of insurance that provide similar insurance cover unless, before the
contract was entered into the insurer clearly informed the insured in
writing of the effect of the provision (whether by providing the insured
with a document containing the provisions, or the relevant provisions,
of the proposed contract or otherwise).”
And of my steadfast denial of the Insurer’s claimed interpretation as
right under the Salary Continuance Policy to establish HIV/AIDS as a
binding norm for the natural life of the contract against my autonomous
right as desire not to be subject to hymeneal religious values based
antagonism associated to a claim of compliance to Natural and Common Law
and Constitutional Rights and for which there are historical precedents.
As conveyed on page 8 of my 4 August 2008 correspondence to the Insurer,
this is of particular merit to my claim as there is a Natural and Common
Law contention by me, that in having to pre-qualify by medical
exclusions placed upon HIV persons before re-entering into an employment
based Contract of Insurance and for which there are further AIDS
exclusions on cessation of employment. And this relates to my autonomic
right under the Commonwealth as a former sworn member of the Police.
This has an impost as virtue, by not only a religious test under Section
116 of the Constitution as the duty towards the avoidance of violence
{ie. Keeping Her Majesty's Peace} undertaken by oath of office. But one
which has a transcendent precedence over marriage {ie. copulation as act
of nature v's autonomic transformative prototype} as obligating norm
within as Commonwealth as natural and common law autonomic hierarchy and
its governance by a transformative prototype imperative as the State’s
Religious / Imperial symbolic perspective of NUMBER as HETEROS (MARRIAGE).
In that this has previously been conveyed to the Insurer with respects
to marriage as enumerated by the policy within sub clause 1.10 as
conveying a natural and common law definition of spouse as meaning
‘husband or wife and defacto spouse’. A defacto spouse is defined
within 1.11 as meaning: ‘a person who living with another person of the
opposite sex as the spouse of that person on a bona fide domestic basis
although not legally married to that other person.’
In my view, there hasn’t been any real attempt by Mike D’Argaville as
Legal Counsel for FICS nor its then Panel Chair Mr. Michael Arnold, to
fully appreciate and empathise with the circumstance of my complaint and
that they have simply differed any decision to the euphoria of the
idealistic nihilism as the August 2004 passage of the Marriage
Legislation Amendment Bill as an Act to amend the Commonwealth Marriage
Act 1961 and Family Law Act 1975, with a formal monogamous definition of
gamogenesis as: “marriage means the union of a man and a woman to the
exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life.”
With regards to that Commonwealth political perspective on the ‘same
couples situation’, Prime Minister John Howard gave a response to such a
question posed to him during a State visit to Ireland, that was reported
on by Maria Hawthorne, a journalist for ‘The Australian Newspaper’ in a
22 May 2006 www-page edition of breaking news item titled “China no
closer to democracy”. He described the push for gay marriage as ‘a form
of minority fundamentalism’ and defended his Federal Government’s
decision to define marriage as the union of a man and a woman through
the Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill 2004 as an Act to amend the
Marriage Act 1961 and the Family Law Act 1975, effectively outlawing gay
marriage--that you don’t require “in every aspect of one’s institutions
and one’s arrangements in society, [to] have technical equivalence. … I
think it is discrimination against homosexuals to deny them employment
opportunities because they’re homosexual, I think it’s discrimination to
deny them property rights and we have sought to, as we see the need, we
have sought to remove that,” he said. “But to carry it to the lengths of
saying, well you’ve got to give an equivalence in relation to marriage -
I don’t support that view and I have absolutely no unease of any kind in
supporting the decision that’s been taken.”
In my 16 September 2008 [SUPER: #222 / #2 - Contrast of Terms/
Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 - Peace; Tetra: #16 - Contact / EGO: #352 /
#41 - Playing with Reversal/ Sameness in Difference; I-Ching: H26 -
Restraining Force; Tetra: #60 - Accumulation] Internet discussion with
an individual claiming to be
Mark Latham
only.idiots.vote.labor.com>
I said, “I'm currently writing this perfect cure for those who on the
Internet, use the term 'dolt' as meaning fooling—that the reason for
people using this term as an epithet which the story conveys, this is
that they suffer from Messiah complex associated to category of
understanding #435.
They suffered miserably and failed in their calling!”
Mark Latham asked: “What about #69?”
I replied, “Well as you recall, from my emailing directly to you the
mathematical model was the then work in progress on the #369 x 7 matrix
within the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON at the time of the consideration
of the August 2004 passage of the Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill as
an Act to amend the Commonwealth Marriage Act 1961 and Family Law Act
1975, with a formal monogamous definition of gamogenesis as: “marriage
means the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others,
voluntarily entered into for life.”
That #69 as a category of understanding is the mechanism of change
within the function of governance which the many call religion has a
default Kabbalistic mathematical & chronological prime directive (of
which you can do nothing (participation may be voluntary) because it is
part of the software function intrinsic to being a homosapien) and also
relates to the theory of number, language, psych and soul.
It is also specifically the contemplative focus of the chapter of the
Nabal (fool's) Chronicles entitled “Mission Accomplished: My Crown of
Thorns and God's Departure of Soul” [enclosed] and given my 0829 hours
Internet pre-decision political observation on 16 September 2008, that
“one of the consequences of the Liberal Party making a leadership
decision today between Brendan Nelson and Malcolm Turnbull in the
shadows of Peter Costello's wannabe-if-I-could aspirations--Is that it
puts closure on Howard's governance of 12 years over which time the
persecution to death of individuals through Contract of Insurance
associated with marriage, employment and superannuation as being a
'shit-stain' and stench on democracy occurred.”
It is likely, given the serendipity of those public events to my own
life circumstance, they will to be the basis for my next chapter
entitled: “-- anyone heard about Dolf?”-- That they comprise a
teleological statement of belief which is compliant with the sovereign
autonomic right of being a citizen of state and participant in its
function of governance as regulative free-will.
I then went on to say that when I'm talking about a technology as
function of governance {ie. dynamic natural associators made to temporal
categories of the understanding as reference to an underlying reality or
substance of the hypostasis}
That this is what is meant by the undertaking of an oath of office: “I
[name] swear by Almighty God” to “without favour or affection malice or
ill-will”, “see and cause her Majesty's peace to be kept and preserved;
and that I will prevent to the best of my power all offences against the
same” and “while I shall continue to be a member of the Police Force ...
I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all duties
legally imposed upon me faithfully and according to law.”
The 'gizmo.html' document was the actual mechanism I deployed to extract
these Categories of Understanding from an excellent and exceptional
gematric resource provided by Richard Amiel McGough's BibleWheel.com to
the Bible's Strongs based Hebrew and Greek Concordance:
http://www.biblewheel.com/Gr/GR_Database.asp?Gem_Number=435&SearchByNum=Go
In point of fact, if you go to this URL and save the [table] structure
beginning with:
'All the Words in the Bible with Sum ='
and concluding with:
'Record Count:'
And if you are on Apple's Safari browser for Macintosh, copy this
selected portion to TextEdit, and then save it as a WWW-page archive.
You'll find this 'gizmo.html' retrieval example will work very well.
And you'll find as I have, that with no exception of those #409
categories of understanding which were specific to my interest in their
capacity as:
a) Hierarchy elements
b) Non temporal elements
c) Temporal elements
That some 6 Mb of XML data conveying those temporal elements which
define the Grapple Homoiotic Noumenon and its function of governance,
have an extensive Hebrew and Greek linguistic correspondence and Bible
reference.
One immediate example and relevant to the technical definition and
notion of HETEROS (MARRIAGE) within the vMeme / Moment Kabbalistic Cube
as autonomic transformative prototype of the male / female ENNEAD, is
the category of understanding #435 as the element I particularly wish to
examine in relation to what the Apostle Paul calls: “alienated and
enemies in your mind by wicked works, [vCyan: #312 (#69 - Profound Use/
Function of the Mysterious) / #435 (#30 - Government without Coercion/
Be Chary of War)] yet now hath he reconciled in the body of his flesh
through death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in
his sight”
There are some elements:
6,40,300,80,9 = mishpat,judgment
6,80,10,30,3,300,6 = piylegesh,concubine
5,400,30 = hathal,mock
50,80,300,5 = nephesh,soul
400,30,5 = talah,hang
5,20,10,400 = nakah,smite
20,40,70,300,5 = ma`aseh,work
6,30,5,100,200,4,40,10,40 = qardom,axe
40,5,300,40,10,40 = shamayim,heaven
30,5,300,20,10,30,40 = sakal,understand
8,7,10,400,10 = chazah,see
30,100,300,5 = qasheh,stiffnecked
400,5,30 = halal,praise
10,300,9,50,6,50,10 = satan,adversary
20,300,5,60,20,30 = cakal,fool
300,10,30,30,5,10,50 = tillo,pluck
5,3,5,100,9,8,300,5 = egeiro,rise
4,10,1,20,70,50,70,10,200 = diakonos,minister
4,10,5,300,1,60,5,50 = diatasso,command
4,5,60,1,40,5,50,70,200 = dechomai,receive
5,9,5,1,200,1,200,9,5 = theaomai,see
200,20,70,80,5,10,50 = skopeo,mark
3,5,3,5,50,50,8,300,1,10 = gennao,begat
80,5,80,5,10,200,40,5,9,1 = peitho,persuade
I'm proposing that the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is the encyclical
architecture intrinsic to the BIBLE and commend the following in an
attempt to arrive at a common Gematric form that can be universally
adopted--I wish to use these literary fragments for computer based
decision making.
The GRAPPLE Homoiotic Noumenon as celestial hierarchy is a statement on
the hyponomic character of the hypostasis, where, the ternary number
logic and Hypostatic Theory: #LAMED (#30) #HE (#5) #TAU (#400) = #435
with gematric association to common dynamic natural associator as key
concepts found in the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Gospel crucifixion
narratives and to that Christian identity which is self contained in its
attribution and substance--including a chronological component:
#LAMED = DATE(2001,9,12) + 6 * 364 days = 2184 'OTH CYCLE of the
Everlasting Covenant
#HE = 5 September 2007 and
#TAU = vCyan transformative prototype as outer intellect (ego) has
categories of understanding assigned to #237 - 'Use of Force' and 3
August (#294 / #433) [Revelation 22:13-16; Exodus 22:28-31]
That central to defining a technical equivalence for marriage {ie. being
of necessity binary in apparatus} and its notional association to the
Christian passion of 31-40 CE and German fascism of 1933-1945 CE, is its
capacity to architecturally interfere with the sovereign autonomic right
enabled by the Letters Patent of 1900 to the Australian Constitution of
1901 as the MOTHER IMAGE and linguistic perspective shared in common and
naturally with the Religious Mysteries. When we talk of the Mother Image
and its shared religious perspective, this relates to the Letters Patent
to the Australian Constitution as hanging upon the 13th Letter (Mem) as
the 'tongue of decree' and 21st letter (Shin) which contains the
liability provision {ie. meta descriptor: #142 - #40, #6, #90, #1, #5 =
Out-goings, descents or lineages; privies or sewers} with respect to
perpetual bestowal upon the Sovereign, their heirs and successors.
The A-U-M {Aleph-Shin-Mem} mother letters by which it epitomizes the
religious / imperial architecture has an etymology involving the mother
goddess as festival of Opet (19 July = #400 / #361) and the Egyptian
Thebian triad of Amun (1933 German Reich Concordat 20 July = #363 /
#396), Mut and Khonsu (23 July = #306 / #408) and this is shown in
relation to the vMeme / Moment Kabbalistic Cube Autonomic Transformative
Prototype:
Ever wondered why it is, Christians are so happy to talk about the
institutional economy as binary logic of male and female copulation
idealised in marriage as 'the union of male and female to the exclusion
of all others voluntarily entered into for life'?
But that ternary logic requires something more than a discussion with
eunuchs and their understanding of a theoretical (TRINITARIAN:
dual-natured infinite potential manifested within the temporal as
instigated time) man and a coherent underlying philosophical reality or
substance, as opposed to attributes or that which lacks substance: "Who
is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: For
by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in
earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones [vRed: #365 (#41 -
Playing with Reversal/ Sameness in Difference) / #400 (#76 - Strength's
Warning Signs/ Revealers of Virtue)], or dominions [vBlue: #488 (#2 -
Contrast of Terms/ Self-Culture) / #396 (#72 - Self-Love/ Holding
Oneself Dear)], or principalities [vYellow: #364 (#40 - Reversal/
Avoiding Activity) / #380 (#56 - Abstruse Virtuosity/ Virtue of the
Mysterious)], or powers [vGreen: #361 (#37 - Non-Deeming Action/
Administration of Government) / #414 (#9 - Inconstancy of Achievement/
Practising Placidity)] all things were created by him, and for him:
And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. And he is
the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn
from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence. For it
pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell; And, having
made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all
things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or
things in heaven.
And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked
works, [vCyan: #312 (#69 - Profound Use/ Function of the Mysterious) /
#435 (#30 - Government without Coercion/ Be Chary of War)] yet now hath
he reconciled in the body of his flesh through death, to present you
holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight: If ye continue in
the faith grounded and settled, [vCoral: #381 (#57 - Laissez Faire
Politics/ Simplicity In Habits) / #442 (#37 - Non-Deeming Action/
Administration of Government)] and be not moved away from the hope of
the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every
creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister.
[vOrange: #407 (#2 - Contrast of Terms/ Self-Culture) / #260 (#17 -
Politics)]" [Colossians 1:15-23 (KJV)]
That this hypostatic mathematical and javascript semantical declaration
as function of governance which the many call religion has a default
Kabbalistic mathematical/chronological prime directive (of which you can
do nothing (participation may be voluntary) because it is part of the
software function intrinsic to being a homosapien) and also relates to
the theory of number, language, psych and soul.
GIZMO[zen][row][col] = {zone : {}, nous: [zone]}
var GIZMO = {
1 : {
1 : {
1 : {11 : {}, nous: [11]}, 2 : {18 : {}, nous: [18]}, 3 :
{13 : {}, nous: [13]},
4 : {74 : {}, nous: [74]}, 5 : {81 : {}, nous: [81]}, 6 :
{76 : {}, nous: [76]},
7 : {29 : {}, nous: [29]}, 8 : {36 : {}, nous: [36]}, 9 :
{31 : {}, nous: [31]}
},
2 : {
1 : {16 : {}, nous: [16]}, 2 : {14 : {}, nous: [14]}, 3 :
{12 : {}, nous: [12]},
4 : {79 : {}, nous: [79]}, 5 : {77 : {}, nous: [77]}, 6 :
{75 : {}, nous: [75]},
7 : {34 : {}, nous: [34]}, 8 : {32 : {}, nous: [32]}, 9 :
{30 : {}, nous: [30]}
},
…
}
}
Since this quote from [Colossians 1:15-23 (KJV)] was written in about 62
CE as 'Construing a Guide/ Practise Reason; I-Ching: H23 -
Disintegration; Tetra: #70 - Severence' relates to a preeminent Jewish
understanding of the celestial hierarchy as a function of Greco-Roman
Governance and to which the Magic Square of the time also corresponded.
We are talking about their claimed religious belief as Christian
identity being irrational, as a figment of their own self-delusion. That
is because one cannot get a rational explanation from them for that
belief. I say again, by your own admission: 'things based on faith which
cannot be explained rationally', any dialog with you on religious
values, identity and obligations by the Roman Catholic Church towards
any recognition of the autonomic right to regulative free-will is
irrational and incommensurate.
That in the absence of a teleological statement of belief which is
compliant with the sovereign autonomic right of being a citizen of state
and participant in its function of governance as regulative free-will,
the foolish seem to be so ready to agree:
Jeff (aka 1stCenturyApostolic@Traditionalist.com): “There used to be a
professing Sodomite encourager who went by the name of Dolf who was
heavily into Aids, anyone heard about him lately?”
“Take heed unto thyself, and the doctrines; continue in them: for in
doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.” [1
Timothy 4:16 (KJV)]
Guardian Snow (aka phoenixhasrisen@yahoo.com.au /
snowpheonix@eck.net.au): “He seems to have really taken an interest in
me. Should I be concerned?”
baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net): “Dolf lives in Australia, is a gay
activist, very much into kabbalah/gematria, probably a genius, difficult
to understand unless you have a background in kabbalah/gematria, looney.
Why should you be concerned? (LOL) He probably thinks you understand
him. If I were you I wouldn't worry about him.”
Super: #31 - Military Strategies as Guides/ Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Endurance; Tetra: #51 - Constancy, Ego: #37 - Non-Deeming Action/
Administration of Government; I-Ching: H40 - Deliverance; Tetra: #21 -
Release, Nuance: #21 - Guiding and the Physical/ Emptying the Heart;
I-Ching: H31 - Influence; Tetra: #42 - Going to Meet
.Understanding: Male Idea: #164 has 0 Categories.
--- pr.n. "Small".
--- outer; civil (profane).
--- dainty (of food).
--- knowledge, understanding
--- to cut or hew.
Female Idea: #102 has 0 Categories.
--- firmness; security; faithfulness.
--- to eat greedily, to swallow down; to destroy utterly.
--- the space between two hosts (armies); sons.
--- possession, control; property; Baal; Lord; to marry, to be
husband; master; to rule; to reject or despise.
--- pr.n. "Pleasantness".
--- pr.n. "Bright".
--- pr.n. "Flowing", "Melting"; "Lent Succor by God".
--- to shine, to be splendid.
--- to set, establish; to be set, firm, sure.
--- to sport or jest.
--- precious or costly things.
--- a circle (of persons sitting in company); round about.
--- servant or worshipper of Yahweh.
--- to swell, to rise up.
--- to prevail.
Guardian Snow: “I'm not, but it doesn't hurt to ask questions. Somebody
seemed interested enough to mention him.”
“Beliefs have the power to create and the power to destroy. Human beings
have the awesome ability to take any experience of their lives and
create a meaning that dis-empowers them or one that can literally save
their lives.” [Tony Robbins]
Guardian Snow: “I still don't understand. Sorry.”
"Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee?
But he held his peace, and answered nothing."
Guardian Snow: "Your entitled to your opinion and your judgments of me
do not define me, they define you. I do not feel I have wronged you, so
don't hold your breath waiting for me to apologize."
"Again the high priest asked him, and said unto him, Art thou the
Christ, the Son of the Blessed?"
Guardian Snow: "The Good News of (Hebrew: Jeshua) Messiah is about
righteous behaviour and not condemnation which you have already put
forward. I was honest with you and you've already labelled me a
'fa[s]cist' when I stated that I respect your point of view."
"And Jesus said, I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the
right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. Then the high
priest rent his clothes, and saith, What need we any further witnesses?
Ye have heard the blasphemy: what think ye?"
Guardian Snow: "You stated I was, 'sprouting nonsense' when I attempted
to point out scriptures. Your cut and paste rant makes no sense to me
still and maybe you should work on making it less about an accusation
and more clear. I really don't understand a single thing your talking
about."
"And they all condemned him to be guilty of death. And some began to
spit on him, and to cover his face, and to buffet him, and to say unto
him, Prophesy: and the servants did strike him with the palms of their
hands." [Mark 14:60-65]
“'Men have forgotten this truth,' said the fox. 'But you must not forget
it. You become responsible, forever, for what you have tamed.' And now
here is my secret, a very simple secret; it is only with the heart that
one can see rightly, what is essential is invisible to the eye.”
[Antoine de Saint-Exupery]
And is claimed piety and fascist conduct by Australians who's self
indulgent nationalism is hardly virtuous and representative of the
cultural reality that Australia is a Dutch possession colonised by the
British according to a Genesis Principle and Letters Patent of 1900 to
the Commonwealth of 1901.
Furthermore in substantiation of that claim, I enclose correspondence
dated 14 July 2008 [SUPER: #341 / #57 - Laissez Faire Politics/
Simplicity In Habits; I-Ching: H37 - Family; Tetra: #39 - Residence /
EGO: #357 / #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse/ Revealers of Virtue;
I-Ching: H61 - Inner Truth; Tetra: #1 - Centre] made to Telstra and the
Equal Opporunity and Human Rights Commissions with respect to matters
before them and the consideration that the Insurer has consistently used
obstruction, denial and nihilism as isolationism over the past 12 years
in its categorical refusal to administer a contract which is unlawful,
unconstitutional and fascist in character.
That a claim of racial, religious and sexual vilification can proceed
against the foreign Insurer and its employees for their disrespect of
responsibilities to State—That I have defined a hypostatic mathematical
and javascript semantical declaration as function of governance {ie.
dynamic natural associators made to temporal categories of the
understanding as reference to an underlying reality or substance of the
hypostasis} can be sustained by and have a trans-substantive basis
within Industrial, Religious and Political Activity as events preceding
my arrest of Saturday 21 August 1999 and also within Intellectual
Property known as the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON:--
And a meta descriptor [#174 / #209 - Good or #174 / #142 - Bad]
inclination and moral dichotomy associated with the allotment of Crown
Land title--deeds [#209 - #8 #200 #1 = To ease the bowels; excrements,
dung] under the colonies as nomarchy in 1852 and the liabilities of
Section 9 [#142 - #40, #6, #90, #1, #5 = Out-goings, descents or
lineages; privies or sewers] in the Letters Patent of 1900 to the
Australian Commonwealth of 1901, it may well be a case of the Lieutenant
Governor exercising the natural, regulative and metempirical principles
of good governance as ‘certain powers, functions, and authorities’
declared to be vested within ‘the office of Governor General and
Commander in chief over Our said Commonwealth of Australia’
As teleological circumscribing the Letters Patent associated to a
‘private’ status of a carriageway adjoining the North Melbourne exchange
as Crown Land allotment entry which subsequently enabled “Saint Andrews
Street to be one of the roads reserved as private in said sub-divisions
as a carriageway in favour of abutting owners.”
I’m of the view that I have been unnecessarily and systematically
subject to psychological distress by the Insurer for a protracted period
of time due to their not having adequately addressed the issues
repeatedly raised by in writing on 4 April 2004 as diary notes served on
Professor Nicholas Keks as the Independent Medical Assessor for the
Insured and by Registered Post on the Insurer.
From the original information and particulars of complaint lodged on 3
August 2000 with the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights
Commission, the Insurer was advised that “on 23 July 1996 following
continued allegations of mental health impairment asserted by associates
who were nominated as powers of attorney and enduring powers of attorney
(medical), I privately sought a medical examination and advice of Dr.
Bruce Brew, associate professor of medicine and consultant physician and
neurologist situated at Saint Vincent’s Hospital, Darlinghurst, Sydney.
He furnished me with the following statement, ‘This is to certify that I
examined Dolf Boek today. I find no evidence of cognitive impairment; in
particular there is absolutely no evidence of AIDS dementia.’”
That the grounds for ‘psychological issues’ that are having a ‘negative
influence’ upon your return to work pertains to the contrariwise
characterizations as information supplied with my 3 October 2005 Salary
Continuance, Total but Temporary Disability, Progress Claim Form
statement arising from an arrest on Saturday 21 August 1999 following a
determined and conspicious protest. This view was sustained by a letter
dated 11 March 2005 [Ref: 50219R1] from the Manager, Community
Investigations Unit, Ombudsman’s Office, who states:
“I have also considered the copy of letter you received from the
Director of Psychiatry, Alfred Hospital, dated 28 November 2003 and
believe that the procedures described therein do not suggest that there
remains a need for this office to further pursue your allegations as to
being admitted as an inpatient in August 1999. On the above basis I do
not intend recommending that you be provided with a formal written
apology as you requested and do not intend to take any further action in
relation to these matters at this time.” [Victorian State Ombudsman, 11
March 2005]
The letter dated 28 November 2003 from the Director of Psychiatry at the
Alfred Hospital reads in part:
“One issue which I would like to raise with you is your contention that
no diagnosis was made during your admission to The Alfred Inpatient Unit
in August 1999. I think that is incorrect. The circumstances are as
follows. Brian Griffin of the Inner West C.A.T. Team assessed you on 21
August and completed an Authority to Transport without Recommendation
form as is provided for under the Mental Health Act. In it he said,
‘Dolf is psychotic and expresses delusions re his role in the end of the
world. He was apparently catatonic earlier in the interview. He is
insightless re his situation.’
You were brought to The Alfred where you were recommended for inpatient
psychiatric care. Copies of those forms are attached and unfortunately
were not in your medical record and you probably didn’t have them
previously provided to you.
As you were brought into hospital on Sunday, 22 August you were examined
by our oncall psychiatrist, Dr. Kemp. She found that you met the
involuntary detention criteria under the Mental Health Act. She did not
come to a firm diagnosis and thought you were more likely than not to
have hypomania.
You were examined by Dr. Kym Jenkins the day after and she confirmed the
diagnosis of hypomania. On 25 August you were no longer in need of
involuntary hospitalization and Dr. Kym Jenkins discharged you off the
Act. During the course of your admission you were seen by Associate
Professor Judd who also confirmed a diagnosis of hypomania.
Thus there seemed little doubt in the mind of a number of psychiatrists
at The Alfred that you were hypomanic at the time of admission and you
settled quickly.” [Associate Professor Peter Doherty, Director of
Psychiatry, The Alfred Hospital]
Following discussions with the attendant medical staff on 6 February
2004, a letter of release addressed to Dr. Monica Slavin which proposed
being signed by myself and the Alfred Hospital’s Principle Officer as a
means to bringing resolution, closure and cessation to a continued and
present intrusion into HIV care made grievous by frequent public based
Internet vilification and casual circulation of my medical details
containing this errant medical information.
I have always been of the view that there was never sufficient medical
grounds to substantiate my involuntary admission as a psychiatric
patient on 21 August 1999 and this inconclusiveness is a medical view
expressed by a 9 September 1999 entry within the patient’s medical
records situated at the Melbourne Sexual Health Clinic and seemingly
made by Mr. Peter Hayes after my discharge on 25 August 1999, Namely:
“9/9/99 Call from A. Mijch. Dolf presently in the psychiatric unit at
Alfred. No diagnosis made yet. Request into family history to assist
with this.”
And this view is further sustained by the requirement to fully satisfy
the additional need to provide corroborating evidence concerning any
possible side effects of present pharmaceuticals usage and their
impairment to driving capability, expressed by VicRoads as their legal
responsibility under the Road Safety Act to ensure that drivers remain
safe to drive. I furnished ‘Medical Report for Drivers’ with the
following comments as indication of how my ‘driving may be affected by
the medical condition. Providing clinical data, final diagnosis and
current treatment, including medication and any likely side effects.’
Namely:
1. Doctor Darren Russell on 14 August, 2000 said that, “[Patient] has
HIV infection and is asymptomatic. CD4 count = 290 (13%%). Patient’s
driving ability is not affected by his condition.”
2. Dr. John Clifforth on 22 December, 2002 said that, “This patient has
HIV yet is intellectually and physically capable of driving with no
restriction.”
On 17 May 2003 the matter was referred to the Victorian Ombudsman for a
consideration as to whether VicRoads had any authority and were
unjustified in the action as driver’s licence suspension &
disqualification instigated by a regime of annual medical reporting as
‘Requirements, Conditions and Practices’ for Licence Retention. As
there then existed no medical grounds on which the ‘requirement,
condition and practice’ as driver licence suspension imposed by
VicRoads, a renewal was obtained for a 10 year period and without the
pre-requisite annual medical reporting imposed for perpetuity in August,
2000.
The lack of ‘psychological issues’ being sufficient or continuing
grounds for arrest and involuntary psychiatric admission was more
recently tested following my ANZAC day (25 April 2006) arrest in Avon
Street, Briagolong, my subsequent conveyance and detention at the
Briagolong Police Station.
The ‘psychological issues’ that are having a ‘negative influence’ upon
my return to work, manifestly relate to the consequence of the
psychiatric profile as entry within my medical records following an
arrest on Saturday 21 August 1999. That despite, recourse under Section
39 of the Freedom of Information Act No. 9859/1982 to ‘request the
correction or amendment of any part of that information where it is
inaccurate, incomplete, out of date, or where it would give a misleading
impression’. And the matter being referred to the Victorian State
Ombudsman, who ‘believe[s] that the procedures described therein do not
suggest that there remains a need for this office to further pursue your
allegations as to being admitted as an inpatient in August 1999.’
The simple observation is, that while the Insurer on 26 April 2006
states as a requirement under the Contract, that it may “reasonably
require during the pendency of a claim” and specifically “in order for
[the Insurer] to further assess [my] claim in relation to the
‘psychiatric issues’ indicated by Dr Lim, we consider that it is
appropriate that you be examined by a Psychiatrist.”
That as stated there are ‘psychiatric issues’ that are having a
‘negative influence’ upon your return to work which has manifested
between 23 July 1996 when there was “no evidence of cognitive
impairment; in particular there is absolutely no evidence of AIDS
dementia” and 11 December 2007 when I appear to be manifesting symptoms
of ‘hypermania’ in addition to the observation, that the immune function
remains depressed in comparison to its August 2000 empirical values.
That this is consequentially due to a direct and prolonged status of
administrative arbitrariness and pendency of the claim and the
administrative overbearing as euthanasia and an institutional practice
of appeasement, Denial & Recourse to Nihilism as Isolationism--I believe
that unauthorised access of erroneous information relating to my mental
health as allegations conveyed by their computer records to be the
source of rumours and the Equal Opportunity & Humans Rights Commission's
(EOHRC) lack of responsiveness regarding my previous complaints.
- dolf
http://www.grapple.id.au/
