Nachdem in einem anderen Thread der Versuch, eine Schwäche in den
Bemühungen der Vorratsdatenspeicherung aufzuzeigen, durch offenbar
paranoide Nebelkerzenwerfer massiv behindert wurde, soll hier ein anderer
Ansatz gewagt werden. Ein Gedankenexperiment soll die Problematik, Nutz-
und Verkehrsdaten zu trennen, aufzeigen, und wer kreativ genug ist, wird
ohnehin verstehen, wie damit anonymisierte Kommunikation möglich ist.

Man betrachte ein Netzwerk aus Servern, auf denen Daten freigegeben sind
und nach dem Peer-To-Peer-Prinzip ausgetauscht werden können. Hierfür gibt
es schon mächtige Ansätze, um Anonymität und Abstreitbarkeit...

Na bitte. Nach Schäuble nun die Vertreter des Bundesverbandes, die die
Datenzusammenführung loben.

http://www.bitkom.de/de/presse/8477_49780.aspx
- Erster Anstrich.

Um ein Auto zulassen zu dürfen, werden bereits die eigenen Kontodaten an
die Finanzbehörden übermittelt.
Nun darf man parken auch mit der Ãœbermittlung von Kontodaten, Adresse,
Kennzeichen, Namen, Rufnummern.

Und weil das Ganze auch noch ein abgespaltenes Uni-Projekt ist, macht es
umsomehr Spass jedem seine Daten zur Verfügung zu stellen.

Das die Mautbrücken der Rasterfahndung dienen soll(t)en, ist ja dann
nicht mehr notwendig.

Stimmt Handy-Besitzer nicht mit Fahrzeughalter überein, oder ist ein
zweites, auf den Handynutzer angemeldetes Handy an einem anderen
Standort, dann wird sein Konto gesperrt, das Auto sichergestellt und
seine Wohnung überwacht.

Was wollen wir noch mehr? Niemand braucht Angst zu haben, sein Handy
oder Auto würde geklaut werden! Wir finden es!

Na bitte!

Wenn ich eine überweisung auf ein anderes konto mache, dann erscheint
der name des kontoinhabers auf meinem kontoauszug. Das ist nicht der
name, den ich eingebe, sondern der name, unter dem das andere konto
geführt wird.
Das überascht mich, denn a) will ich vielleicht nicht, dass sichtbar
wird, an wen ich überweise und b) will der zahlungsempfänger
vielleicht nicht, dass der kontoinhaber sichtbar wird.

Ist das vorgehen der bank korrekt?

Jens Martin Schlatter

"Thorsten Weisert" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1i9l5kb.1jbug1q5kuzqN%%tw@domain.invalid...

ab 2012 würd ich sagen!

MI5 Persecution: Molestation during. Travel

MI5s persecution of me varies. in intensity. Since 1990 it has been steady
for perhaps 80%% of the time; there was a notable quiet period. in 1993, and
another quiet period in Jan-Feb 1995, as well as. a hiatus in the first two
months of. 1999. It puzzles me that they cease and restart, seemingly
without any logic or reason.. But one aspect of MI5s activities against me
which is relatively predictable is this weeks articles topic, which. is
Molestation during Travel.. Almost every time I cross the Atlantic, go to
the Continent or even try to enjoy a holiday in. this country, you can bet
that MI5 will be there doing their utmost to wreck. it all.

This aspect of the. harassment is particularly relevant as I will be
travelling to Europe again in a months time, with naturally. the Minidisc
recorder in tow; so it will be interesting to see if I. can record the
abuse which will almost certainly. take place, either on the Tube going to
the airport,. at the airport, on the flight, in the terminal building - MI5
have previously instituted instances of abuse at. each of these locations,
so well. see how much taxpayers money they waste this time, and whether it
will prove possible to capture. their abuse on minidisc.

Read about the MI5. Persecution on the Web

MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters Lie & Deny They're. Watching Me

Central to the persecution campaign waged. against me for some nine years
now by the Security Service is their use. of the media, and in particular
the broadcast media, to. make clear to me that I am under surveillance and
being watched within. my own home, even by BBC newscasters while they read
the news.. This is really an act of arrogance; MI5 and their tools in the
television and. radio are so sure that they can never be caught, that they
have many times made explicity clear on broadcast programmes. that they are
as capable of. seeing me as I am of seeing the broadcast pictures. Even
when they have known I am taping the. programmes they still carry on this
practice;. for examples of TVand radio presenters caught "in action", see
the Evidence area. of my website.

If. you wish to reply to this article......
then please include your name and fax number! I provide the means. for
recipients to send me their thoughts on the topics. discussed, but ask that
you provide me with. your fax number or email address if you require a
response. Also would you please send not. more than one or two pages, if by
fax.. Thank-you!

It started with a Newscaster, and it continues with. Newscasters today

Four Years of. "MI5 Persecution" Posts on Internet Newsgroups

For approximately the first three years of the MI5. persecution, from June
1990 until late 1992,. I kept as quiet as possible, in the hope that by not
reacting, MI5s interest in me would decrease and they would. simply go away
of their own. accord. This is the sort of behaviour some people employ
against. bullies; if the bullies arent getting a reaction, then they might
simply go away. and victimize someone else.

Unfortunately, this tactic didnt work. The. quieter I became, the more
shrill. and hysterical the noise from the Security Service operatives. For
about two years I didnt watch TV news at. all. Yet this only heightened
their obsessed fixation;. they continued to follow me wherever I went, they
continued. to induce harassment at work by managers and fellow workers, and
they continued to encourage me to commit. suicide. They seemed to regard my
refusal to react as a crime. which they would have to "put right" by ever
more. extreme forms of abuse.

MI5 Persecution Update:. Friday 30 April, 1999

If You Intend To. Reply, Please Read This
Please.... keep your response to. one page!. Faxes over a page or two will
be deleted. without being read.

Somewhere between 0. and 100%%

The last few days there have been no clear recordable instances. of
abuse. However, while travelling on the Underground,. while walking around
near my home and going to friends homes, I am. constantly troubled by
thoughts that those people over there might be about to get at. me; that
the couple sitting in the opposite seats laughing are in fact laughing. at
me;. et cetera, et cetera.

A comment. by a scientist to the BSE inquiry sticks in my mind. He
described the possible scale of the epidemic. as "between 0%% and 100%%". It
might not be happening, it might not happen. at all, to any discernable
degree.... or it. might be total. Without clear recording, which seems to
have become. impossible the last couple of weeks, there is no way of
knowing whether the harassment really. is continuing, whether we have
entered a temporary hiatus, or whether perhaps it. has perhaps stopped for
now.

MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 16. April, 1999

If You Intend To Reply, Please. Read This
Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a page. or two will
be deleted without being. read.

BBC newscaster Nicholas Witchell cant stop. himself laughing

During 1990-91. there were very many instances of "interactive
television" where newscasters and other TV presenters. saw on a screen
before them. what was happening in my home, and reacted, frequently by
laughing at. me. During this period I unfortunately did not record these
programmes. For. the last year or two, I have been recording everything I
watch, and there has been a drastic decrease in. such incidents.

However, on occasion, television. presenters do still engage in
"interactive watching" and react to what they. see. This has been evident
with Jon Snow of Channel Four. News recently - a particularly interesting
case, since it has been established that he cannot be corrupted. by money
(it is well-documented that MI5 offered him a. tax-free salary and he
turned them down). I wonder what device MI5 are using to. encourage him to
do the. "interactive watching"?

"Das FBI arbeitet nach einem Zeitungsbericht am Aufbau der weltgrößten Datenbank
für biometrische Informationen. Das eine Milliarde Dollar teure Projekt gebe der
US-Regierung beispiellose Möglichkeiten, Personen in den USA und im Ausland zu
identifizieren, berichtete die "Washington Post". Neben Fotos und
Fingerabdrücken zählten dann auch Augenscans oder Sprachmuster zu den
gesammelten Informationen. Bürgerrechtler sehen den Trend kritisch und
befürchten eine Gesellschaft, in der ständig überwacht wird." (dpa)

Was die heutigen "Demokratien" so anstellen, hat nie zuvor ein diktatorisches
System geschafft. Weder Nazis noch Kommunisten haben eine solch umfangreiche
Totalüberwachung der gesamten Bevölkerung hinbekommen. Darum: Glückwunsch an
unsere "Demokraten". Der Orwell-Roman "1984" war mitnichten auf die Sowjetunion
gemünzt, sondern auf den Westen im Jahre 2008.

tw