MI5 Persecution:. Molestation during Travel

MI5s persecution of me varies in intensity. Since 1990 it has. been steady
for perhaps 80%% of the time; there was a notable. quiet period in 1993, and
another quiet period in Jan-Feb 1995, as well as. a hiatus in the first two
months of 1999. It. puzzles me that they cease and restart, seemingly
without any logic. or reason. But one aspect of MI5s activities against me
which is relatively predictable is this weeks articles. topic, which is
Molestation. during Travel. Almost every time I cross the Atlantic, go to
the Continent or even try to enjoy a. holiday in this country, you can bet
that MI5 will be there doing their utmost to wreck it. all.

This aspect of the harassment is particularly relevant as I. will be
travelling to Europe again in a months time, with naturally the. Minidisc
recorder in tow; so it will be interesting. to see if I can record the
abuse which will almost certainly take place,. either on the Tube going to
the airport, at the airport, on the flight, in. the terminal building - MI5
have previously instituted instances of abuse at. each of these locations,
so well see how much taxpayers money they waste this time, and whether. it
will prove possible. to capture their abuse on minidisc.

Read about. the MI5 Persecution on the Web

MI5 Persecution:. BBC Newscasters Lie & Deny They're Watching Me

Central to the persecution campaign waged against me for some. nine years
now by the. Security Service is their use of the media, and in particular
the broadcast media, to make clear to me that I am. under surveillance and
being watched within my own home,. even by BBC newscasters while they read
the news. This. is really an act of arrogance; MI5 and their tools in the
television and radio are so sure that they can never be caught,. that they
have many times made. explicity clear on broadcast programmes that they are
as capable. of seeing me as I am of seeing the broadcast pictures. Even
when they. have known I am taping the programmes they still carry on this
practice; for examples of TVand radio presenters caught "in action",. see
the Evidence area. of my website.

If you. wish to reply to this article......
then please include your name and fax. number! I provide the means for
recipients to send me. their thoughts on the topics discussed, but ask that
you provide me with your fax number or email address if you require. a
response. Also would you please send not more than one or two pages, if. by
fax.. Thank-you!

It started with a Newscaster, and it continues. with Newscasters today

Four Years. of "MI5 Persecution" Posts on Internet Newsgroups

For approximately the first three years of the MI5 persecution,. from June
1990 until late 1992, I kept as quiet. as possible, in the hope that by not
reacting, MI5s interest in me. would decrease and they would simply go away
of their. own accord. This is the sort of behaviour some people employ
against. bullies; if the bullies arent getting a reaction, then they might
simply go. away and victimize someone else.

Unfortunately,. this tactic didnt work. The quieter I became, the more
shrill and hysterical the noise from the Security Service operatives.. For
about two. years I didnt watch TV news at all. Yet this only heightened
their obsessed fixation;. they continued to follow me wherever I went, they
continued to induce harassment at work by. managers and fellow workers, and
they continued to encourage me to. commit suicide. They seemed to regard my
refusal to react as a crime which they would have to. "put right" by ever
more extreme forms of. abuse.

MI5 Persecution Update: Friday. 30 April, 1999

If You. Intend To Reply, Please Read This
Please.... keep your response to one page!.. Faxes over a page or two will
be. deleted without being read.

Somewhere between. 0 and 100%%

The last. few days there have been no clear recordable instances of
abuse. However, while travelling on. the Underground, while walking around
near my home and going. to friends homes, I am constantly troubled by
thoughts that those people over there might be. about to get at me; that
the couple sitting. in the opposite seats laughing are in fact laughing at
me; et cetera, et. cetera.

A comment by. a scientist to the BSE inquiry sticks in my mind. He
described the. possible scale of the epidemic as "between 0%% and 100%%". It
might not be happening, it might not. happen at all, to any discernable
degree.... or it might be total.. Without clear recording, which seems to
have become impossible the last couple of weeks, there. is no way of
knowing whether the harassment really. is continuing, whether we have
entered a temporary hiatus, or whether perhaps. it has perhaps stopped for
now.

MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 16 April,. 1999

If You Intend To. Reply, Please Read This
Please..... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a page or two will
be. deleted without being read.

BBC newscaster. Nicholas Witchell cant stop himself laughing

During 1990-91 there were very many instances. of "interactive
television" where newscasters and. other TV presenters saw on a screen
before them what was. happening in my home, and reacted, frequently by
laughing at me. During this period I unfortunately did not record. these
programmes. For the last year or two,. I have been recording everything I
watch, and there has been a drastic decrease in such. incidents.

However,. on occasion, television presenters do still engage in
"interactive watching" and react to what they see. This has. been evident
with Jon Snow of Channel Four News. recently - a particularly interesting
case, since it has been established that he cannot be corrupted by. money
(it is well-documented. that MI5 offered him a tax-free salary and he
turned them down). I wonder what device. MI5 are using to encourage him to
do the. "interactive watching"?

(Martin Trautmann) 18.12.07 in /de/comm/provider/mail:

Es wird auch nicht "blind" überschrieben.

Schau Dir mal die Seiten zu SPF an.

Dort ist beschrieben, das ein Server, der eMails weiterleitet,
gefälligst den originalen Absender in seine Domain einzuwickeln hat.
Der Empfangs-Server "wickelt" das wieder aus, so das i.d.R.
weder Absender noch Empfänger diese Christo-Orgie mitbekommen.

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework#Probleme_bei_Mail-Umleitung
Und speziell:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Rewriting_Scheme
http://www.libsrs2.org/srs/srs.pdf

"Ralf Döblitz" doeblitz.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:fk97rc$p5s$6@msgid.netzverwaltung.net...

Davon abgesehen, daß "remove-this" nahelegt, daß ein Teil der
Adresse remove-d werden muß, um die Adresse gültig zu machen:

Manche Leute sind so kleinkariert und beißen sich an Regeln
fest, die schon längst überholt sind. Und selbst wenn der
Nachtrag zum RFC ein Entwurf ist, wird das kommen. Technisch
stellt sich mir die Frage nicht, was wohl sinnvoller ist: Traffic
für eine nicht gelesene Mailbox oder eine .invalid-Adresse, bei
der erst gar kein Traffic entsteht.
Und nochmal: wo steht im RFC, daß ein Usenetposting keine
"online construction" ist, wo eine Testadresse verwendet
werden kann? Oder ignorierst du Argumente aus Prinzip?

Wenn die offizielle Regelung ist, daß du an einer grünen Ampel
5 Minuten warten sollst, tust du das wohl, auch wenn die
Empfehlung lautet, daß nicht gewartet werden müsse.

Martin Trautmann schrieb:

Klar. Stichwort SRS.

Das ist ein bereits einige Jahre alter Hut. :)

-thh

Martin Trautmann in :

Wenn Du ein anderes Bild bekommen hast, als es Thomas Hochstein
ausführlicher und weniger emotionell als ich geschildert hat,
lägest Du aber so zeimlich falsch.

CU!
Ulrich

Hi,

Martin Trautmann schrieb:

Klar geht auch das senden über einen Smarthost oder andere
Zwischenstationen. Aber wer SPF verwendet (also der Empfänger, der die
weitergeleitete E-Mail nicht bekommen hat) verlangt von jedem
anliefernden Server, dass dieser ehrlich ist und eine Adresse als
Absender angibt, für dessen Domainpart er zuständig ist, also in diesem
Sinne nicht die Absenderadresse fälscht.

Wer zuständig ist entscheidet der Domain-Inhaber über den SPF-Eintrag.
abc.de gibt als Absender eine Adresse von GMX an, laut SPF-Eintrag für
gmx.de ist er aber nicht zuständig.