-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= harassment at. work -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Once I stopped watching television and. listening to the radio at the end of
1990,. "they" had to find other ways of committing abuses. So they took what
must be for them a tried and tested route; they get at you by. subversion of
those around you.. Since they wouldn't be able to do that with my family or
friends,. that meant getting at people in the workplace to be their
mouthpieces and. do their dirty work for them.

They supplied my employers in. Oxford with details from what was going on in
my private life, and what I and other people had said at my. home and
accommodation in Oxford. So. people at work repeated verbatim...

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= why the. security services? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

You may ask, why do I. think the "they" referred to are the security
services? Is there any evidence that there is a. single source, as opposed
to a loosely based "whispering campaign" amongst many. people? Even if there
is a single source, is there. any evidence that "they" are professional
"buggers" as opposed to amateurs, or perhaps people working. for a privately
funded. organization?

a) As to the question of. a single source versus something more fragmented;
it. is quite obvious that there is a single source from the way the campaign
has been carried out.. Since things have been repeated verbatim which were
said in. my home, there must be one group which does the watching and
listening. Since on several occasions (mainly. during travel) people have
been planted in close proximity and. rehearsed in what they were to say, it
follows that someone must have done the planning. for that, and again a
single source. is indicated.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= why the security services?. -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

You may ask, why do I think the "they". referred to are the security
services? Is. there any evidence that there is a single source, as opposed
to a loosely based "whispering campaign" amongst. many people? Even if there
is a single source, is there any evidence that "they". are professional
"buggers" as opposed to amateurs, or perhaps people working for a. privately
funded. organization?

a) As to the question of a single source versus something. more fragmented;
it is quite obvious that there. is a single source from the way the campaign
has been carried out.. Since things have been repeated verbatim which were
said in my home, there must be one. group which does the watching and
listening. Since on several. occasions (mainly during travel) people have
been planted in. close proximity and rehearsed in what they were to say, it
follows. that someone must have done the planning for that, and again a
single. source is indicated.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=. MI5: methods and tactics -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

They deliberately set out to harass in a way. that would resemble the
symptoms of schizophrenia,. so that any report of the harassment would be
taken as indicating mental illness. and "treated" accordingly. They never
show their own faces;. they only work through proxies, in the media, among
the public, and by manipulating people in the workplace.. Since they do not
declare their identity there is no evidence to initiate legal. action
against the security services or anyone else. The only people. you can
prosecute are the. proxies and they will deny knowledge of any conspiracy.

By repeatedly humiliating and abusing the victim,. they induced mental
illness. This is the worst form of human rights. violation: making any
statement of the harassment appear to be symptomatic of. the illness which
they cause through the harassment.. That this can happen, and people collude
by. silence, is absolutely horrifying.