Paul Lehmann schrieb:

Denkst du, Spammer interessieren sich für Antwortpostings?

Etwas interessiert außerdem nicht wer, sondern wen. ;)

Früher tummelte sich hier der eine oder andere Einfältige. Jetzt ist
alles besser.

Ich grüße wieder alle Fans !!!

* "Canaille von Dornfeld-Trollingen" weinte:

Schnauze!

Wegtreten!

So is rächd[tm]!

--

Dann geh aufs Klo und schlabber Dir die richtige raus, wenn Dir nicht
paßt, was ich sage.
Detlef Bosau in

MI5 Persecution: .net Magazine Applauds my Website

The March 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine reviews the MI5
Persecution website describing it as an "excellent site". The webpages
describe in detail the nature of my persecution since 1990 by what are
believed to be elements of the UK security service.

(snip image)

You are encouraged to read the web pages which include

o a FAQ section outlining the nature of the persecutors, their methods
of harassment through the media, people at work and among the general public
o an evidence section, which carries audio and video clips of media and
workplace harassment, rated according to how directly I think they refer to me
o factual descriptions of the state security agencies involved
o scanned texts of the complaints I have made to media and state security agencies involved
o posts which have been made to netnews over the last three years on this topic

12638

441712192872 nyyyyyYnnnnnYYYEYYYYYYYYYYYnyyynyynnynyynyyyyy
441712192873 yyyyyyYyyyyyyNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712192879 yyyyyyYnyyyyyYYYYYEYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynyny
441712192905 yyyyyyYyyyynnYYYYNNNNNYYNYEYynyyynyyyyyyynyyyyy
441712192912 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYEYYEEYYYYYYEYyyyyynyyyyyyyynyyyy
441712192921 nyyyyyYyynyynEYYYYYYYYYEEYNYynnnnnynnynynyyyyyy
441712192949 yyyyyyYyyynynYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynn
441712192957 yyyyyyYyyyyynYYYEYYYYYYYYYEYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712192965 ynyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYNYYYYYyynynyyynynyyyyyyyy
441712192969 ynnnnnYnnyyyyYNEEYYNYNEYEYNYnnnynyyyynNnyynnyny
441712192991 ynnyyyYyyyyynYYEEYYYYYYYEYYYynyyyynynnnEnnnnnnB
441712193000 nnynynNynnnnnNNNNYNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712193010 yyyyyyYyynynyNYYEYEYYYYEYYNYyyynnnnyynNnynnnyny
441712193047 yyyyyyYynyyyyYYYYYYEYYYYYYYEyyyynyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193085 yyyyyyNyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193373 yyyyyyEyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYEYyyyyynyyynnYnnnnnnB
441712193382 yyyyyyYyyyynyYYEYYYYYYYYEYEYnnnyynnyyyyyynnnyy
441712193398 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYEYYYEYYYYyyyyyyynyyyyyyynyyy
441712193434 nyyyyyYyynyyyYYYYYEYNYYYYYYYynyyynnnyyyyyyyynyy
441712193496 ynyyyyYnnnynnNYEYNYEYYYYYYYEyyyynnnnnnyynnyyyyy ...

Faxes Sent to British Parliament logs

During the 1998-2000 period my records indicate that I sent at least 14,480 faxes to the British Parliament
in Westminster, of which 9,138 went via TPC's email-to-fax service and 5,342 were sent via fax-modem direct from
my computer. The actual figure is obviously much higher since, for most of this period, whenever a recipient asked to
be deleted from my mailing list, I totally wiped all entries including that from the logfile.

In the records "Y" indicates successful transmission from fax-modem, "N" indicates failed transmission from fax-modem.
"E" indicates an error occurred while transmitting via fax-modem and a fax may have been only partly transmitted.
"y" and "n" indicate success or failure via TPC.

In April 2000 I changed the method of operation by recording "R" when a recipient requested removal, rather than
wiping their details from my mailing list and records; and keeping "B" records for when TPC actioned a ban on a
recipient's fax-number, but the recipient did not write to ask me to cease faxing. The purpose of these changes
was to keep more accurate and complete records, but the intention was thwarted by the police complaint.

441712190076 nnnnnynnEnnnnnnYYNNYYYYNENNNNNynynnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712190179 yyyynnyyyYnyyyyynYYYNYYYYYYEYEEEyyyyyyynyyyynyyyyy
441712190189 yyynyyyyyYyyyyyyyYYYEYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190243...

Faxes Sent to British Media logs

During the 1998-2000 period my records indicate that I sent at least 6,137 faxes to the British media,
of which 5,775 went via TPC's email-to-fax service and 362 were sent via fax-modem direct from my computer.
The actual figure is obviously higher since, for most of this period, whenever a recipient asked to be deleted
from my mailing list, I totally wiped all entries including that from the logfile.

In the records "Y" indicates successful transmission from fax-modem, "N" indicates failed transmission from fax-modem.
"E" indicates an error occurred while transmitting via fax-modem and a fax may have been only partly transmitted.
"y" and "n" indicate success or failure via TPC.

In April 2000 I changed the method of operation by recording "R" when a recipient requested removal, rather than
wiping their details from my mailing list and records; and keeping "B" records for when TPC actioned a ban on a
recipient's fax-number, but the recipient did not write to ask me to cease faxing. The purpose of these changes
was to keep more accurate and complete records, but the intention was thwarted by the police complaint.
Also in April 2000, I added some further fax numbers to my media mailing list and records, which is why some of the
faxnumbers below have only a single entry, and some indeed have none.

441132420652 yyyyyYyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441132439387 yyyyyYyyynyyyyyyyy
441132445107 yyyyyYyyyyyynyyyyyy
441132455139 n
441132460037 yyyyyYyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441132461105 yyyyyYyyynyyynnnnnn
441132836586 yyyyyYynyyyyyyyyyyy...

Faxes Sent to British Diplomatic/Legal logs

During the 1998-2000 period my records indicate that I sent at least 3,642 faxes to diplomatic and legal offices
located in the British isles, of which 3,345 went via TPC's email-to-fax service and 297 were sent via fax-modem
direct from my computer. The actual figure is somewhat higher since, for most of this period, whenever a recipient
asked to be deleted from my mailing list, I totally wiped all entries including that from the logfile.

In the records "Y" indicates successful transmission from fax-modem, "N" indicates failed transmission from fax-modem.
"E" indicates an error occurred while transmitting via fax-modem and a fax may have been only partly transmitted.
"y" and "n" indicate success or failure via TPC.

In April 2000 I changed the method of operation by recording "R" when a recipient requested removal, rather than
wiping their details from my mailing list and records; and keeping "B" records for when TPC actioned a ban on a
recipient's fax-number, but the recipient did not write to ask me to cease faxing. The purpose of these changes
was to keep more accurate and complete records, but the intention was thwarted by the police complaint.

441712011004 yyyyYyynyyyyyny
441712210448 yyynYnynyyyyy
441712212818 yyyyYyyyyyyyy
441712215685 yyyyYyyyyyyyy
441712250947 nynnYyynyyyyy
441712252130 nnnnYynnyyyyn
441712253024 ynyyYyyyyyyyy
441712253862...

Fanatic's Fare for the Common Man

Certainty level: 90%%

The article reproduced below was penned by Bernard Levin
for the Features section of the Times on 21 September 1991. To my mind, it
described the situation at the time and in particular a recent meeting with
a friend, during which I for the first time admitted to someone other than
my GP that I had been subjected to a conspiracy of harassment over the
previous year and a half.

There is a madman running loose about London, called David Campbell; I have
no reason to believe that he is violent, but he should certainly be
approached with caution. You may know him by the curious glitter in his
eyes and a persistent trembling of his hands; if that does not suffice, you
will find him attempting to thrust no fewer than 48 books into your arms,
all hardbacks, with a promise that, if you should return to the same
meeting-place next year, he will heave another 80 at you.

Balham Hill Post Office (14/Nov/2002)

Certainty level: 80%%

By mid-November 2002 the persecution had again dwindled, as happens sometimes, when along came this item.
I spent most of my time at home, going occasionally to the shops in Clapham South, or into town to meet people. On this particular
Thursday I only left the house once, for less than fifteen minutes to post a letter (special delivery, because my ordinary and
recorded delivery letters had been disappearing en route for some time - not that anyone would accuse MI5 of such petty harassment).
At the post office counter there was an Asian guy talking into his mobile phone and grinning away. There is a probability that
his comments were directed at me, as I will explain further. The second segment of audio closely follows the first segment.

"you'll do it today? let's meet about 3 o'clock and have some lunch. I got stuff to do and I'll go to the bank,
get this sh.. fucking moving yeah. Even just a little bit do something. He doesn't understand, you know what it is,
I don't want to tell him again cause then he might, he thinks we're having a go at him, I'm not having a go at him,
I'm explain to him"

Explanation: The guy is talking about some bloke who is unnamed, however it might be interpreted as being in code about me.
"I'll go to the bank"... variously interpretable, either literally, or as sounds-like "wank" which has been a consistent
theme in MI5's abuse. "get this shit fucking moving"... abuse... could be interpreted as MI5's criticism of my inertness.
The state spends hundreds of thousands of pounds a year - they want to see some result, not just neutrality and ordinariness.
"he doesn't understand"... MI5 claim I'm stupid... but the numbers and bits of paper prove otherwise, so perhaps what that
is really about is their agents' subconscious perception of themselves.