|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Drew D. SaurDrew D. Saur Date: Feb 11, 2008 03:32
I have been disappointed with the relative performance of Firefox 3 beta
on the Mac, so I am running a poll on The Mac Orchard that asks the
question:
"Despite all of the hoopla stating otherwise, Firefox 3 beta for seems
to be a big step backward in rendering performance when compared to
Firefox 2, which could be a bad thing for the Mac. What has your
experience been?"
Guests are invited to vote.
Please see:
< http://www.macorchard.com/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/themaco/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1202
725660>
Drew
|
| |
|
| | 33 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Mr. StratMr. Strat Date: Feb 11, 2008 07:18
In article news-server.rochester.rr.com>,
Drew D. Saur macorchard.com> wrote:
> I have been disappointed with the relative performance of Firefox 3 beta
> on the Mac, so I am running a poll on The Mac Orchard that asks the
> question:
>
> "Despite all of the hoopla stating otherwise, Firefox 3 beta for seems
> to be a big step backward in rendering performance when compared to
> Firefox 2, which could be a bad thing for the Mac. What has your
> experience been?"
That's a great idea - compare a beta product to one that already
shipping.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Jolly RogerJolly Roger Date: Feb 11, 2008 10:33
In article news-server.rochester.rr.com>,
"Drew D. Saur" macorchard.com> wrote:
> I have been disappointed with the relative performance of Firefox 3 beta
> on the Mac
I guess nobody ever informed you that software developers often leave
debugging code that can have a detrimental effect on speed enabled in
beta releases?
--
Note: Please send all responses to the relevant news group. If you
must contact me through e-mail, let me know when you send email to
this address so that your email doesn't get eaten by my SPAM filter.
JR
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Drew D. SaurDrew D. Saur Date: Feb 11, 2008 14:18
In article <110220080718572377%%rag@ nospam.techline.com>,
"Mr. Strat" nospam.techline.com> wrote:
> In article news-server.rochester.rr.com>,
> Drew D. Saur macorchard.com> wrote:
>
>> I have been disappointed with the relative performance of Firefox 3 beta
>> on the Mac, so I am running a poll on The Mac Orchard that asks the
>> question:
>>
>> "Despite all of the hoopla stating otherwise, Firefox 3 beta for seems
>> to be a big step backward in rendering performance when compared to
>> Firefox 2, which could be a bad thing for the Mac. What has your
>> experience been?"
>
> That's a great idea - compare a beta product to one that already
> shipping.
|
| Show full article (1.15Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: VirtualGuyVirtualGuy Date: Feb 11, 2008 17:32
Jolly Roger wrote:
> In article news-server.rochester.rr.com>,
> "Drew D. Saur" macorchard.com> wrote:
>
>> I have been disappointed with the relative performance of Firefox 3 beta
>> on the Mac
>
> I guess nobody ever informed you that software developers often leave
> debugging code that can have a detrimental effect on speed enabled in
> beta releases?
>
It may also depend on the computer system itself,i.e., processor type,
OS, etc.
VG
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: doraymedorayme Date: Feb 11, 2008 18:59
In article ,
VirtualGuy wrote:
> [ .. ]
I really don't think anyone should be speed testing FF. It is
absurd. It would be like testing a turtle for swiftness; turtles
are simply not about *swift* anything in spite of their many
other admirable qualities. It is rude and demeaning to turtles to
even suggest it. Please stop now.
--
dorayme
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Drew D. SaurDrew D. Saur Date: Feb 13, 2008 16:55
In article <110220080718572377%%rag@ nospam.techline.com>,
"Mr. Strat" nospam.techline.com> wrote:
> In article news-server.rochester.rr.com>,
> Drew D. Saur macorchard.com> wrote:
>
>> I have been disappointed with the relative performance of Firefox 3 beta
>> on the Mac, so I am running a poll on The Mac Orchard that asks the
>> question:
>>
>> "Despite all of the hoopla stating otherwise, Firefox 3 beta for seems
>> to be a big step backward in rendering performance when compared to
>> Firefox 2, which could be a bad thing for the Mac. What has your
>> experience been?"
>
> That's a great idea - compare a beta product to one that already
> shipping.
Upon further experimentation, I found relief by going to about:config
and changing "network.dns.disableIPv6" to "true".
It seems that IPv6 DNS lookups are what is slowing Firefox 3 down!
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: doraymedorayme Date: Feb 13, 2008 17:28
In article
news-server.rochester.rr.com>,
"Drew D. Saur" macorchard.com> wrote:
> Now Firefox 3 is much faster. Maybe even faster than Firefox 2...
What are you measuring exactly? My Safari opens like a bolt of
lightening whereas FF (which I need and use too) comes on like it
is doing me a favour, it seems to have this idea that it is some
sort of Prima donna. When it does come on, I slap it about. It
remembers and is even more mule like next time. But it reaches a
limit of slowness and then I know I have won, I can ill treat it
as much as I like with no further consequences. With Safari, I
have respect. It just does things quick smart and it would not
occur to me to ill treat it, it has a sort of aura that precludes
this.
--
dorayme
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: jeffjeff Date: Feb 13, 2008 17:55
Unable to vote without going thru a long process of registering
with user name, password, etc, etc.
Why do you have to make it so hard to just make an opinion.
I will pass.
jeff
|
| Show full article (0.75Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: jeffjeff Date: Feb 13, 2008 17:56
I rarely use FF 2 as is is much slower (imho) than Safari 3
jeff
Mr. Strat wrote:
> In article news-server.rochester.rr.com>,
> Drew D. Saur macorchard.com> wrote:
>
>
>>I have been disappointed with the relative performance of Firefox 3 beta
>>on the Mac, so I am running a poll on The Mac Orchard that asks the
>>question:
>>
>>"Despite all of the hoopla stating otherwise, Firefox 3 beta for seems
>>to be a big step backward in rendering performance when compared to
>>Firefox 2, which could be a bad thing for the Mac. What has your
>>experience been?"
>
>
> That's a great idea - compare a beta product to one that already
> shipping.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|
|
|