|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: jackojacko Date: Jul 11, 2006 16:25
so when one task executes
Q' DOTHIS ( returns a que identifier and forks)
it places the execution semantics for transfer to the free "allocation
pool"
so a processor which executes
Q, (executes the fork and has a que identifier on stack)
recalls a process to execute from the allocation pool
implicitly a dual way communications channel is set up
accessed via
Q@ Q! ( que identifier argument required)
que protection from bad use would be optional, but would involve
checking fork parentage
maybe Q@! could be used to join two ques up so the parent need not be
the switch gate. but only a one way join so that rings can be made.
does that cover it or did i miss anything?
|
| |
|
| | 27 Comments |
|
|
Author: Ilgaz ÖcalIlgaz Öcal Date: Aug 18, 2006 18:10
On 2006-08-19 04:00:33 +0300, Michelle Steiner michelle.org> said:
> Hello All -
>
> Thought I'd finally come out and let everyone know in comp.sys.mac.system and
This post is completely fake, you can easily see from usenet host
Michelle Steiner and this fake poster uses.
NNTP-Posting-Host: 6d2c3f72.news.qwest.net -->This post (abuse@ qwest.net)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@ cox.net --> Real Michelle Steiner post
I'd sue the fake poster or at least contact some civil organisations
about this.
Ilgaz
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
|
Author: G.T.G.T. Date: Aug 18, 2006 18:31
|
| |
| 5 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Jeffrey GoldbergJeffrey Goldberg Date: Aug 18, 2006 20:18
Michelle Steiner wrote:
> Hello All -
>
> Thought I'd finally come out and let everyone know [...]
I find it interesting that this announcement (as if it were news, she's
not exactly tried to keep this a secret) coincides with a change in the
bit of network Michelle usually posts from.
Maybe it is just a coincidence that the new Michelle is posting from the
same bit of network that Ted Landry posts from.
At first I thought that Landry was a kook instead of a troll. (I'd made
the same mistake about Ernie). But once I saw M-ID
<44e1fdf9$0$494$815e3792@ news.qwest.net> in which Landry writes
> michelle seems to be the only women in basically a man's group, she
> seems quite angry for some reason.
I knew that he was a troll.
We seem to have attracted some interesting trolls in the past few months.
Anyway, seeing that I'm responding to a troll, I'll try to make this my
last posting in this thread.
-j
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: TaliesinSoftTaliesinSoft Date: Aug 18, 2006 20:59
I could care less about Michelle Steiner's background. I do care that the
person posting as Michelle Steiner has posted informative and helpful
suggestions in these newsgroups.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ura DippschitUra Dippschit Date: Aug 18, 2006 21:00
In article <44e662b2$0$3578$815e3792@ news.qwest.net>,
Michelle Steiner michelle.org> wrote:
> Thought I'd finally come out and let everyone know in
> comp.sys.mac.system and comp.sys.mac.comm that I'm actually a guy
Nice try, Ted. Dickwad.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Aug 18, 2006 23:41
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:54:57 -0600, Michelle Steiner wrote
(in article news.west.cox.net>):
> In article <0001HW.C10BD01100030D4EF0407530@ news.sasktel.net>,
> Ruddell canada.com> wrote:
> >> Kinda confuses me because I figured that Michelle had to be some
>> real, drop dead gorgeous woman and had no reason to question that
>> idea. Ok, I still don't but anyone got a pic?
>
> Well, at age 63, I'm not exactly drop dead gorgeous, but I am a real
> woman.
I'm a young 50 and still drive a Mac. Besides, beauty is in the eye of the
beholder which of course I'm not one of.
> And Landry is a psychopath.
Yeah, I'm nuts too but that's ok. Life is short so why not enjoy it.
Thanks for your help and keep up the good work...
--
Cheers!
Dennis
|
| Show full article (0.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
